9.12. ITERATED INTEGRALS 221

Definition 9.12.1 A measure space (Ω,F ,µ) is called σ finite if there are mea-surable subsets Ωn such that µ (Ωn)< ∞ and Ω = ∪∞

n=1Ωn.

Next is a σ algebra which comes from two σ algebras.

Definition 9.12.2 Let (X ,E ) ,(Y,F ) be measurable spaces. That is, a set with aσ algebra of subsets. Then E ×F will be the smallest σ algebra which contains themeasurable rectangles, sets of the form E×F where E ∈ E , F ∈F . The sets in this newσ algebra are called product measurable sets.

Definition 9.12.3 Given two finite measure spaces, (X ,E ,µ) and (Y,F ,ν) ,onecan define a new measure µ×ν defined on E ×F by specifying what it does to measurablerectangles as follows:

(µ×ν)(A×B) = µ (A)ν (B)

whenever A ∈ E and B ∈F .

We also have the following important proposition which holds in every context inde-pendent of any measure.

Proposition 9.12.4 Let E ⊆ E ×F be product measurable E ×F where E is a σ

algebra of sets of X and F is a σ algebra of sets of Y . then if Ex ≡ {y ∈ Y : (x,y) ∈ E} andEy ≡ {x ∈ X : (x,y) ∈ E} , then Ex ∈ E and Ey ∈F .

Proof: It is obvious that if K is the measurable rectangles, then the conclusion of theproposition holds. If G consists of the sets of E ×F for which the proposition holds,then it is clearly closed with respect to countable disjoint unions and complements. This isobvious in the case of a countable disjoint union since

(∪iE i

)x = ∪iE i

x, similar for y. Asto complement, if E ∈ G , then Ex ∈F and so

(EC)

x = (Ex)C ∈F . It is similar for y. By

Lemma 8.3.2, Dynkin’s lemma, G ⊇ E ×F . However G was defined as a subset of E ×Fso these are equal. ■

Let (X ,E ,µ) and (Y,F ,ν) be two finite measure spaces. Define K to be the set ofmeasurable rectangles, A×B, A ∈ E and B ∈F . Let

G ≡{

E ⊆ X×Y :∫

Y

∫X

XEdµdν =∫

X

∫Y

XEdνdµ

}(9.15)

where in the above, part of the requirement is for all integrals to make sense.Then K ⊆ G . This is obvious.Next I want to show that if E ∈ G then EC ∈ G . Observe XEC = 1−XE and so∫

Y

∫X

XEC dµdν =∫

Y

∫X(1−XE)dµdν =

∫X

∫Y(1−XE)dνdµ

=∫

X

∫Y

XEC dνdµ

which shows that if E ∈ G , then EC ∈ G .Next is to show G is closed under countable unions of disjoint sets of G . Let {Ai}

be a sequence of disjoint sets from G . Then, using the monotone convergence theorem asneeded, ∫

Y

∫X

X∪∞i=1Aidµdν =

∫Y

∫X

∑i=1

XAidµdν =∫

Y

∑i=1

∫X

XAidµdν

9.12. ITERATED INTEGRALS 221Definition 9.12.1 A measure space (Q,.¥,p) is called o finite if there are mea-surable subsets Q,, such that f (Qn) < e% and Q = U?_;Qn.Next is a o algebra which comes from two o algebras.Definition 9.12.2 Let (x,2),(Y,F ) be measurable spaces. That is, a set with ao algebra of subsets. Then & x ¥ will be the smallest 6 algebra which contains themeasurable rectangles, sets of the form E x F where E € &, F € ¥. The sets in this new0 algebra are called product measurable sets.Definition 9.12.3 Given two finite measure spaces, (X,&,W) and (Y,F,V) ,onecan define a new measure LL x V defined on & x # by specifying what it does to measurablerectangles as follows:(ux v)(AxB) = H(A) Vv(B)wheneverA € & and Bc F.We also have the following important proposition which holds in every context inde-pendent of any measure.Proposition 9.12.4 Let E C & x F be product measurable € x F where & is aoalgebra of sets of X and F is ao algebra of sets of Y. then if Ex ={y € Y : (x,y) € E} andEy = {x €X: (x,y) € E}, then E, € & and Ey € F.Proof: It is obvious that if ~ is the measurable rectangles, then the conclusion of theproposition holds. If Y consists of the sets of & x ¥ for which the proposition holds,then it is clearly closed with respect to countable disjoint unions and complements. This isobvious in the case of a countable disjoint union since (U;E') = U;Ei, similar for y. Asto complement, if E € Y, then E, € F and so (EC) = (E,)© € ¥. It is similar for y. ByLemma 8.3.2, Dynkin’s lemma, Y D> & x ¥. However Y was defined as a subset of & x Fso these are equal.Let (X,&,) and (Y, ¥,v) be two finite measure spaces. Define .% to be the set ofmeasurable rectangles, A x B, A € & and B € F. Letg={ecxxy: | [ %eauav= | [ 2eavay} (9.15)Y JX XJSYwhere in the above, part of the requirement is for all integrals to make sense.Then #% CG. This is obvious.Next I want to show that if E € Y then E© € Y. Observe 2c = 1— 2% and so[ | Gecauav = [ [0-2 )anav= [ [a 2%)avan| | %ecavduxX JYwhich shows that if E € Y, then EC € Y.Next is to show Y is closed under countable unions of disjoint sets of Y. Let {A;}be a sequence of disjoint sets from ¥. Then, using the monotone convergence theorem asneeded,Kye duav = [| %s,dudv = | [ Faauav[I ue, A;@H V Do Aja LL Ld hy Aja