228 CHAPTER 9. THE LEBESGUE INTEGRAL

Proof: By the Weierstrass approximation theorem, Corollary 5.7.8, or Theorem 5.9.5,there exists a polynomial ĝ such that ∥ĝ−h∥K < δ

3 . Then define for y ∈K g (y)≡ ĝ (y)+h(z)− ĝ (z) Then g (z) = ĝ (z)+h(z)− ĝ (z) = h(z). Also

|g (y)−h(y)| ≤ |(ĝ (y)+h(z)− ĝ (z))−h(y)|

≤ |ĝ (y)−h(y)|+ |h(z)− ĝ (z)|< 2δ

3

and so since y was arbitrary, ∥g−h∥K ≤ 2δ

3 < δ . If Dg (z)−1 exists, then this is what iswanted. If not, use Lemma 9.14.1 and note that for all η small enough, you could replaceg with y→ g (y)+η (y−z) and it will still be the case that ∥g−h∥K < δ along withg (z) = h(z) but now Dg (z)−1 exists. Simply use the modified g. ■

The main result is essentially the following lemma which combines the conclusions ofthe above.

Lemma 9.14.3 Let f : B(p,r)→Rn where the ball is also inRn. Let f be one to one, f

continuous. Then there exists δ > 0 such that f(

B(p,r))⊇ B(f (p) ,δ ) . In other words,

f (p) is an interior point of f(

B(p,r))

.

Proof: Since f(

B(p,r))

is compact, it follows that f−1 : f(

B(p,r))→ B(p,r) is

continuous. By Lemma 9.14.2, there exists a polynomial g : f(

B(p,r))→ Rn such that∥∥g−f−1∥∥

f(B(p,r)) < εr, ε < 1, Dg (f (p))−1

exists, and g (f (p)) = f−1 (f (p)) = p

From the first inequality in the above,

|g (f (x))−x|=∣∣g (f (x))−f−1 (f (x))

∣∣≤ ∥∥g−f−1∥∥f(B(p,r)) < εr

By Lemma 9.13.10,

g ◦f(

B(p,r))⊇ B(p,(1− ε)r) = B(g (f (p)) ,(1− ε)r)

Since Dg (f (p))−1 exists, it follows from the inverse function theorem that g−1 also existsand that g,g−1 are open maps on small open sets containing f (p) and p respectively. Thusthere exists η < (1− ε)r such that g−1 is an open map on B(p,η)⊆ B(p,(1− ε)r). Thus

g ◦f(

B(p,r))⊇ B(p,(1− ε)r)⊇ B(p,η)

So do g−1‘ to both ends. Then you have g−1 (p) = f (p) is in the open set g−1 (B(p,η)) .Thus

f(

B(p,r))⊇ g−1 (B(p,η))⊇ B

(g−1 (p) ,δ

)= B(f (p) ,δ ) ■

pq ◦f

(B(p,r)

)B(p,(1− ε)r))

p= q(f(p))

228 CHAPTER 9. THE LEBESGUE INTEGRALProof: By the Weierstrass approximation theorem, Corollary 5.7.8, or Theorem 5.9.5,there exists a polynomial g such that ||g — All x < o. Then define for y € K g(y)=g(y)+h(z)—@(z) Then g(z) = G(z)+h(z)—G(z) =h(z). Alsolgy)-h(@w| < l(G(w)+h(z)-G(z))-h(y)|26lg (y) —h(y)|+|h(z)-G(z)| < >and so since y was arbitrary, ||g —Al|l, < 20 < &. If Dg(z)' exists, then this is what iswanted. If not, use Lemma 9.14.1 and note that for all 7 small enough, you could replaceg with y > g(y) +n (y—2Z) and it will still be the case that ||g —Al|, < 6 along withg(z) =h(z) but now Dg (z)' exists. Simply use the modified g. llThe main result is essentially the following lemma which combines the conclusions ofthe above.IALemma 9.14.3 Let f : B(p,r) > R" where the ball is also in R". Let f be one to one, fcontinuous. Then there exists 6 > 0 such that f G (p,r)) > B(f (p),5). In other words,f (p) is an interior point of f (3 (p,r)).Proof: Since f G (p,r)) is compact, it follows that f-!: f (B (p,r)) — B(p,r) iscontinuous. By Lemma 9.14.2, there exists a polynomial g: f (3 (p,r)) — R” such thatll9-F-'llse@m) < er,€<1, Dg(f(p))!exists, and g(f(p)) = f '(f(p))=pFrom the first inequality in the above,lg (F (@)) —2|=|9(F (@) - FF @)| < lo-F Mpa <rBy Lemma 9.13.10,90 f (B(p,r)) 2 B(p,(1—£)r) =B(g(F (p)) (1 e))Since Dg (f (p))~' exists, it follows from the inverse function theorem that g~! also existsand that g,g~! are open maps on small open sets containing f (p) and p respectively. Thusthere exists 71 < (1—€)r such that g~! is an open map on B(p,7) C B(p,(1—€)r). Thus9° f (B(p,r)) 2 B(p, (1~e)r) 2B(p,n)So do g~! to both ends. Then you have g~! (p) = f (p) is in the open set g~! (B(p,n)).Thusf (Br) 29°' (B(p,n)) 2B(g"' (p).8) =B(F(p).8)B(p, (1 —€)r))p=4q(f(p))