236 CHAPTER 10. IMPROPER INTEGRALS

+2π

∫∞

δ

sin(ru)u

f (u)du− 2π

∫∞

δ

sin(ru)u

f (0)du (10.7)

Now f (u)u ∈ L1 (δ ,∞) because

∣∣∣ f (u)u

∣∣∣≤ 1δ| f (u)| and so, by the Riemann Lebesgue lemma,

the first integral of 10.7 converges to 0 as r→ ∞. The second integral of 10.7 convergesto 0 as r→ ∞ because of the second part of Theorem 10.2.1. Now consider the integralin 10.6. s→ f (u)− f (0)

u is in L1 ([0,δ ]) because∣∣∣ f (u)− f (0)

u

∣∣∣ ≤ uγ−1 which has finite integral

since γ > 0. Therefore, limr→∞2π

∫δ

0sin(ru)

u ( f (u)− f (0))du = 0 by the Riemann Lebesguelemma.

Theorem 10.2.5 Suppose that g ∈ L1 (R) and that at some x, g is locally Holdercontinuous from the right and from the left. This means there exist constants K,δ > 0 andr ∈ (0,1] such that for |x− y|< δ ,

|g(x+)−g(y)|< K |x− y|r (10.8)

for y > x and|g(x−)−g(y)|< K |x− y|r (10.9)

for y < x. Then

limr→∞

∫∞

0

sin(ur)u

(g(x−u)+g(x+u)

2

)du =

g(x+)+g(x−)2

.

Proof: The function u→ g(x−u)+g(x+u)2 ≡ f (u) is in L1 (0,∞) as noted earlier. Also for

f (0) defined as g(x+)+g(x−)2 , the conditions of Lemma 10.2.4 are obtained. Therefore, from

that lemma,

limr→∞

∫∞

0

sin(ur)u

f (u)du = limr→∞

∫∞

0

sin(ur)u

(g(x−u)+g(x+u)

2

)du

=g(x+)+g(x−)

2as claimed.

There is an other condition which will allow the same conclusion as the above condi-tion. It is that g is of bounded variation on [x−δ ,x+δ ] for some δ > 0. This is calledthe Jordan condition whereas the more common assumption used above is the Dini condi-tion. This Jordan condition implies that u→ (g(x−u)−g(x−)+g(x+u)−g(x+)) is ofbounded variation on [0,δ ].

First, here is a little review. If H is continuous, Theorem 9.9.1, the mean value theoremfor integrals, implies that if g is monotone, (either increasing or decreasing) then∫ b

aH (x)dg = H (c)(g(b)−g(a))

for some c ∈ [a,b]. Suppose then that H (x) ≡∫ x

a h(t)dt where h is continuous and g ismonotone on [a,b] .

Suppose H (x)≡∫ x

a h(t)dt where h is continuous and g is monotone on [a,b] . Then byintegration by parts, Theorem 9.4.1,

∫ ba gdH +

∫ ba Hdg = g(b)H (b). From the first mean

value theorem for integrals, there is c∈ [a,b] such that∫ b

a Hdg=H (c)(g(b)−g(a)) . Then∫ b

aghdt =

∫ b

agdH =−

∫ b

aHdg+g(b)H (b) =−H (c)(g(b)−g(a))+g(b)H (b)

236 CHAPTER 10. IMPROPER INTEGRALSsin(ru) » 2 f@ sin(ru)+2 [° 1 f(u)du~= | —— f (0) du (10.7)TT uNow fe) ) € 1! (5,00) because fu)the first integral of 10.7 converges to 0 as r— co. The second integral of 10.7 convergesto 0 as r — © because of the second part of nents 10.2.1. Now consider the integralin 10.6. s ff) is in L' ([0,6]) because AoZo | <u’! which has finite integralsince y> 0. Therefore, lim,_;.. 2 °C sin(ru) (f (u) _ f (0)) du=0 by the Riemann Lebesguelemma.Theorem 10.2.5 Suppose that g € L'(R) and that at some x, g is locally Holdercontinuous from the right and from the left. This means there exist constants K,6 > 0 andr € (0,1] such that for |x—y| <6,lg (x+) —g(y)|<K|x—y|' (10.8)<5 1 | f(u)| and so, by the Riemann Lebesgue lemma,for y >x andIg(x-) —g(y)| <K|x—y| (10.9)for y <x. Thenkm 2 [Sin (8@-w)+srtu)) 7 _ gat) +a(r)re Jo u 2 2Proof: The function u > seu) tate) = f (u) is in L! (0,) as noted earlier. Also forf (0) defined as att) te) the conditions of Lemma 10.2.4 are obtained. Therefore, fromthat lemma,lim 2 /@ sin (ur) Fludu = tim 2 f@ sin (ur) (§ (x—u)+g(x+u) ) iuroo TT Jo Uu roo TT Jo u 2grt) +80)2as claimed. IJThere is an other condition which will allow the same conclusion as the above condi-tion. It is that g is of bounded variation on [x — 6,x+ 6] for some 6 > 0. This is calledthe Jordan condition whereas the more common assumption used above is the Dini condi-tion. This Jordan condition implies that u > (g(x —u) — g(x—) +g (x+u) — g(x+)) is ofbounded variation on (0, 5].First, here is a little review. If H is continuous, Theorem 9.9.1, the mean value theoremfor integrals, implies that if g is monotone, (either increasing or decreasing) then[2 0)a¢=4(@(e)-8(@)for some c € [a,b]. Suppose then that H (x) = [*h(t)dt where h is continuous and g ismonotone on [a, 5].Suppose H (x) = J? h(t) dt where h is continuous and g is monotone on [a,b]. Then byintegration by parts, Theorem 9.4.1, ? gdH + [? Hdg = g(b)H(b). From the first meanvalue theorem for integrals, there is c € [a,b] such that [? Hdg = H (c) (g(b) —g(a)). Thenb b b[ enar= [gat =— [ Hag+g(b)H(b) = -H(c)(g(b)—8(@)) +8(0) A)a a