10.4. LAPLACE TRANSFORMS 239

Now it is defined that 0! = 1 and so Γ(1) = 0!. Suppose that Γ(n+1) = n!, what ofΓ(n+2)? Is it (n+1)!? if so, then by induction, the proposition is established. From whatwas just shown, Γ(n+2) = Γ(n+1)(n+1) = n!(n+1) = (n+1)! and so this proves theproposition.

The properties of the gamma function also allow for a fairly easy proof about differen-tiating under the integral in a Laplace transform. First is a definition.

Definition 10.3.4 A function φ has exponential growth on [0,∞) if there are posi-tive constants λ ,C such that |φ (t)| ≤Ceλ t for all t ≥ 0.

Theorem 10.3.5 Let f (s) =∫

0 e−stφ (t)dt where t → φ (t)e−st is improper Rie-mann integrable for all s large enough and φ has exponential growth, |φ (t)| ≤Ceλ t . Thenfor s large enough, f (k) (s) exists and equals

∫∞

0 (−t)k e−stφ (t)dt.

Proof: Suppose true for some k ≥ 0. By definition it is so for k = 0. Then alwaysassuming s > λ , |h|< s−λ , where |φ (t)| ≤Ceλ t ,λ ≥ 0,

f (k) (s+h)− f (k) (s)h

=∫

0(−t)k e−(s+h)t − e−st

hφ (t)dt

=∫

0(−t)k e−st

(e−ht −1

h

)φ (t)dt =

∫∞

0(−t)k e−st

((−t)eθ(h,t)

)φ (t)dt

where θ (h, t) is between −ht and 0, this by the mean value theorem. Thus by mean valuetheorem again, ∣∣∣∣∣ f (k) (s+h)− f (k) (s)

h−∫

0(−t)k+1 e−st

φ (t)dt

∣∣∣∣∣≤∫

0|t|k+1 Ceλ te−st

∣∣∣eθ(h,t)−1∣∣∣dt ≤

∫∞

0tk+1Ceλ te−steα(h,t) |ht|dt

≤∫

0tk+2Ceλ te−st |h|et|h|dt =C |h|

∫∞

0tk+2e−(s−(λ+|h|))tdt

Let u = (s− (λ + |h|)) t,du = (s− (λ + |h|))dt and changing the variable, you see thatthe right side converges to 0 as h→ 0 so f (k+1) (t) has the correct form. This proves thetheorem.

The function f (s) just defined is called the Laplace transform of φ .Incidentally, f (k) (s) exists for each k and s ∈C with Re(s)> λ by the same argument.

This will be used later when the computation of inverse Laplace transforms is considered.

10.4 Laplace TransformsIt will be assumed here that t→ f (t)e−st is in L1 (0,∞) for all s large enough.

Definition 10.4.1 We say that a function defined on [0,∞) has exponential growthif for some λ ≥ 0, and C > 0, | f (t)| ≤Ceλ t .

Note that this condition is satisfied if | f (t)| ≤ a+beλ t . You simply pick C > max(a,b)and observe that a+beλ t ≤ 2Ceλ t .

10.4. LAPLACE TRANSFORMS 239Now it is defined that 0! = 1 and so (1) = 0!. Suppose that (n+ 1) = n!, what ofT'(n+2)? Is it (n+ 1)!? if so, then by induction, the proposition is established. From whatwas just shown, (n+ 2) =T'(n+1)(n4+1) =n! (n+ 1) = (n+ 1)! and so this proves theproposition. ffThe properties of the gamma function also allow for a fairly easy proof about differen-tiating under the integral in a Laplace transform. First is a definition.Definition 10.3.4 4 function @ has exponential growth on |0,°°) if there are posi-tive constants 4,C such that |@ (t)| < Ce for all t > 0.Theorem 10.3.5 Let f(s) = Joe "@ (t) dt where t + (t)e™ is improper Rie-@ (t)| <Ce*". Thenmann integrable for all s large enough and @ has exponential growth,for s large enough, f (s) exists and equals {5° (—t)«e~@ (t) dt.Proof: Suppose true for some k > 0. By definition it is so for k = 0. Then alwaysassuming s > A, |h| <s—A, where |@ (t)| < Ce*",A > 0,f (sth) — f (s) in pe thy — est; = | oo ar= [tes ( *)o(ar= [ake (ne) oawhere 0 (h,t) is between —ht and 0, this by the mean value theorem. Thus by mean valuetheorem again,AG) sens (s) — [neo (at< I bane Ce ew0eO(ht) iar < [te icetenentin \at|dt0< [eco en Mar = Cn [Pe OH a0 0Let u = (s—(A+|h|))t,du = (s—(A+|hA|))dt and changing the variable, you see thatthe right side converges to 0 as h + 0 so f (k+1) (t) has the correct form. This proves thetheorem. ffThe function f (s) just defined is called the Laplace transform of @.Incidentally, f (s) exists for each k and s € C with Re(s) > A by the same argument.This will be used later when the computation of inverse Laplace transforms is considered.10.4 Laplace TransformsIt will be assumed here that t + f(t) e~ is in L' (0,0) for all s large enough.Definition 10.4.1 we say that a function defined on [0,°°) has exponential growthif for some A > 0, and C > 0,|f (t)| < Ce.Note that this condition is satisfied if | f (t)| <a+be*. You simply pick C > max (a,b)and observe that a+be* < 2Ce™.