11.5. THE METHOD OF RESIDUES 267

= limz→ 1

2√

2+ 12 i√

2

(ln |z|+ iarg1 (z))+(

z−(

12

√2+ 1

2 i√

2))

(1/z)

4z3

=

ln(√

12 +

12

)+ i π

4

4(

12

√2+ 1

2 i√

2)3 =

(1

32− 1

32i)√

Similarly

res(

f ,−12

√2+

12

i√

2)=

ln(√

12 +

12

)+ i 3π

4

4(− 1

2

√2+ 1

2 i√

2)3 =

332

√2π +

332

i√

2π.

Of course it is necessary to consider the integral along the small semicircle of radius r. Thisreduces to ∫ 0

π

ln |r|+ it

1+(reit)4

(rieit)dt

which clearly converges to zero as r→ 0 because r lnr→ 0. Therefore, taking the limit asr→ 0, ∫

large semicircle

L(z)1+ z4 dz+ lim

r→0+

∫ −r

−R

ln(−t)+ iπ1+ t4 dt+

limr→0+

∫ R

r

ln t1+ t4 dt = 2πi

(332

√2π +

332

i√

2π +1

32

√2π− 1

32i√

).

Observing that∫

large semicircleL(z)1+z4 dz→ 0 as R→ ∞,

e(R)+2 limr→0+

∫ R

r

ln t1+ t4 dt + iπ

∫ 0

−∞

11+ t4 dt =

(−1

8+

14

i)

π2√

2

where e(R)→ 0 as R→ ∞. This becomes

e(R)+2 limr→0+

∫ R

r

ln t1+ t4 dt + iπ

(√2

)=

(−1

8+

14

i)

π2√

2.

Now letting r→ 0+ and R→ ∞,

2∫

0

ln t1+ t4 dt =

(−1

8+

14

i)

π2√

2− iπ

(√2

)=−1

8

√2π

2,

and so∫

0ln t

1+t4 dt = − 116

√2π2, which is probably not the first thing you would thing of.

You might try to imagine how this could be obtained using only real analysis. I don’t haveany idea how to get this one from standard methods of calculus. Perhaps some sort ofpartial fractions might do the job but even if so, it would be very involved.

11.5. THE METHOD OF RESIDUES 267fag Miele (2) + (2— ($v2+ 4iv2)) (1/2)~ ad V34hiv3 423in( brh)+a 14fo (L hi) vieSimilarlynerd) +E3=~ Ving si 20.4(—$v2+ 4iv2), 32 32res (1, v2+ 502) =Of course it is necessary to consider the integral along the small semicircle of radius 7. Thisreduces to[ In|rl+it z (rie) dtxl + ( reit)4which clearly converges to zero as r — O because rlnr — 0. Therefore, taking the limit asr—>0,L TT In(—t) +i| ©) act lim m | inc) + i aylarge semicircle 1 +24 r>0+ J—R 1+tlim “Int Tate= Qui 3 n+ : i/ 20 + u V2n u i/ 20El a5 a5! az — An! .r0+ 1+ 32 32 32 32Observing that fiarge semicircle dz— 0 as R- »,R)+2 lim Masia [| a 14h m/20+ i: -ol+t# \ 8 4where e(R) + 0. as R + o. This becomes_ (v2 1 1) 5R)+2 limNow letting r > 0+ and R > ©»,°° Int 1 2 v2 lp 52 _ = _- _ _ = 2[ att (- gta ii) v2 a( rn *) gV2n",and so fy a dt = ~4V 20°", which is probably not the first thing you would thing of.You might try to imagine how this could be obtained using only real analysis. I don’t haveany idea how to get this one from standard methods of calculus. Perhaps some sort ofpartial fractions might do the job but even if so, it would be very involved.