5.9. AN APPROACH TO THE INTEGRAL 139
= |(Pn (b)−Pm (b))− (Pn (a)−Pm (a))|=∣∣∣∣∫ b
a(pn− pm)dx
∣∣∣∣≤ ∥pn− pm∥|b−a|
Thus the limit exists because{∫ b
a pndx}
nis a Cauchy sequence and R is complete.
From 5.3, 1. holds for a polynomial p(x). Let ∥pn− f∥→ 0. Then by definition,∫ b
af dx≡ lim
n→∞
∫ b
apndx = pn (xn)(b−a) (5.4)
for some xn in the open interval determined by (a,b) . By compactness, there is a fur-ther subsequence, still denoted with n such that xn → x ∈ [a,b] . Then fixing m such that∥ f − pn∥< ε whenever n≥ m, assume n > m. Then ∥pm− pn∥ ≤ ∥pm− f∥+∥ f − pn∥<2ε and so
| f (x)− pn (xn)| ≤ | f (x)− f (xn)|+ | f (xn)− pm (xn)|+ |pm (xn)− pn (xn)|
≤ | f (x)− f (xn)|+∥ f − pm∥+∥pm− pn∥< | f (x)− f (xn)|+3ε
Now if n is still larger, continuity of f shows that | f (x)− pn (xn)|< 4ε. Since ε is arbitrary,pn (xn)→ f (x) and so, passing to the limit with this subsequence in 5.4 yields 1.
Now consider 2. It holds for polynomials p(x) obviously. So let ∥pn− f∥→ 0. Then∫ c
apndx+
∫ b
cpndx =
∫ b
apndx
Pass to a limit as n→ ∞ and use the definition to get 2. Also note that∫ b
b f (x)dx = 0follows from the definition.
Next consider 3. Let h ̸= 0 and let x be in the open interval determined by a and b. Thenfor small h,
F (x+h)−F (x)h
=1h
∫ x+h
xf (t)dt = f (xh)
where xh is between x and x+h. Let h→ 0. By continuity of f , it follows that the limit ofthe right side exists and so
limh→0
F (x+h)−F (x)h
= limh→0
f (xh) = f (x)
If x is either end point, the argument is the same except you have to pay attention to thesign of h so that both x and x+h are in [a,b]. Thus F is continuous on [a,b] and F ′ existson (a,b) so if G is an antiderivative,∫ b
af (t)dt ≡ F (b) = F (b)−F (a) = G(b)−G(a)
The claim that the integral is linear is obvious from this. Indeed, if F ′ = f ,G′ = g,∫ b
a(α f (t)+βg(t))dt = αF (b)+βG(b)− (αF (a)+βG(a))
= α (F (b)−F (a))+β (G(b)−G(a))
= α
∫ b
af (t)dt +β
∫ b
ag(t)dt
5.9. AN APPROACH TO THE INTEGRAL 139= (Px (0) ~ Po (8) ~ (Pua) ~ Po (@))|=| (Pn = Pm) 5] < Pn Pm [PalThus the limit exists because { Ji - is a Cauchy sequence and R is complete.nFrom 5.3, 1. holds for a polynomial p (x). Let ||p, — f|| > 0. Then by definition,b| fdx= tim [ Pndx = Pn (Xn) (b—a) (5.4)for some x, in the open interval determined by (a,b). By compactness, there is a fur-ther subsequence, still denoted with n such that x, — x € [a,b]. Then fixing m such that| f — Pall < € whenever n > m, assume n > m. Then || pm — Pnl| < ||Pm — fl + || f — Pall <2¢€ and soIf (x) — Pn (%n)| SF) — F n)| + LF Gn) — Pm An)| + [Pm (%n) = Pn (Xn)|SF (a) — Fn) + IF P|] + [Pm = Pall < |f) — fn) + 3€Now if 7 is still larger, continuity of f shows that | f (x) — pp (%n)| < 4e. Since é is arbitrary,Pn (Xn) > f (x) and so, passing to the limit with this subsequence in 5.4 yields 1.Now consider 2. It holds for polynomials p (x) obviously. So let ||p, — f|| + 0. Thenc b b| pndx+ [ Pndx =| Pnadxa c aPass to a limit as n + co and use the definition to get 2. Also note that fP f (x)dx =0follows from the definition.Next consider 3. Let # 4 0 and let x be in the open interval determined by a and b. Thenfor small h,x+h)ee TP pioar=sen)where x; is between x and x +h. Let h — 0. By continuity of f, it follows that the limit ofthe right side exists and solim F (x+h) —F (x)h>0 h= lim f (xn) = f (x)h-0If x is either end point, the argument is the same except you have to pay attention to thesign of hf so that both x and x+/ are in [a,b]. Thus F is continuous on [a,b] and F’ existson (a,b) so if G is an antiderivative,[rouse ~ F (b) —F (a) =G(b)—G(a)The claim that the integral is linear is obvious from this. Indeed, if F’ = f,G' = g,[ast +Bel)ar = aF 6) +B6(0)~(aF (a) +BG(@)a(F (b) ~ F (a)) +B (G(b) ~G(a))a | rar+B | gtrar