Chapter 10

The Abstract Lebesgue IntegralThe general Lebesgue integral requires a measure space, (Ω,F ,µ) and, to begin with, anonnegative measurable function. I will use Lemma 2.5.3 about interchanging two supre-mums frequently. Also, I will use the observation that if {an} is an increasing sequence ofpoints of [0,∞] , then supn an = limn→∞ an which is obvious from the definition of sup.

10.1 Nonnegative Measurable Functions10.1.1 Riemann Integrals for Decreasing FunctionsFirst of all, the notation [g < f ] means {ω ∈Ω : g(ω)< f (ω)} with other variants of thisnotation being similar. Also, the convention, 0 ·∞ = 0 will be used to simplify the presen-tation whenever it is convenient to do so. The notation a∧b means the minimum of a andb.

Definition 10.1.1 Let f : [a,b]→ [0,∞] be decreasing. Note that ∞ is a possiblevalue. Define ∫ b

af (λ )dλ ≡ lim

M→∞

∫ b

aM∧ f (λ )dλ = sup

M

∫ b

aM∧ f (λ )dλ

where a∧b means the minimum of a and b. Note that for f bounded,

supM

∫ b

aM∧ f (λ )dλ =

∫ b

af (λ )dλ

where the integral on the right is the usual Riemann integral because eventually M > f .For f a nonnegative decreasing function defined on [0,∞),∫

0f dλ ≡ lim

R→∞

∫ R

0f dλ = sup

R>1

∫ R

0f dλ = sup

RsupM>0

∫ R

0f ∧Mdλ

Since decreasing bounded functions are Riemann integrable, the above definition iswell defined. For a discussion of this, see Calculus of One and Many Variables on the website or any elementary Calculus text. Now here is an obvious property.

Lemma 10.1.2 Let f be a decreasing nonnegative function defined on an interval [a,b] .Then if [a,b] =∪m

k=1Ik where Ik ≡ [ak,bk] and the intervals Ik are non overlapping, it follows∫ b

af dλ =

m

∑k=1

∫ bk

ak

f dλ .

Proof: This follows from the computation,∫ b

af dλ ≡ lim

M→∞

∫ b

af ∧Mdλ = lim

M→∞

m

∑k=1

∫ bk

ak

f ∧Mdλ =m

∑k=1

∫ bk

ak

f dλ

Note both sides could equal +∞. ■In all considerations below, we assume h is fairly small, certainly much smaller than R.

Thus R−h > 0.

279

Chapter 10The Abstract Lebesgue IntegralThe general Lebesgue integral requires a measure space, (Q,.¥,) and, to begin with, anonnegative measurable function. I will use Lemma 2.5.3 about interchanging two supre-mums frequently. Also, I will use the observation that if {a,} is an increasing sequence ofpoints of [0,c°] , then sup, dn = lim, 50d, which is obvious from the definition of sup.10.1 Nonnegative Measurable Functions10.1.1 Riemann Integrals for Decreasing FunctionsFirst of all, the notation [g < f] means {@ € Q: g(@) < f(@)} with other variants of thisnotation being similar. Also, the convention, 0 -°o = 0 will be used to simplify the presen-tation whenever it is convenient to do so. The notation aA b means the minimum of a andb.Definition 10.1.1 Lez f : [a,b] — [0,0] be decreasing. Note that ~ is a possiblevalue. Defineb eb b[ faar= lim MAS (A)dA = sup | MA f(A)daJa Mx Jaq M Jawhere a/b means the minimum of a and b. Note that for f bounded,b bA)da= A) drsup [ Mas(ajaa = | sayawhere the integral on the right is the usual Riemann integral because eventually M > f.For f anonnegative decreasing function defined on |0,°),co R R R| fda = lim | fdr’ =sup | fdA=supsup | fAMddA0 Roe JOR>1/40 R M>0/0Since decreasing bounded functions are Riemann integrable, the above definition iswell defined. For a discussion of this, see Calculus of One and Many Variables on the website or any elementary Calculus text. Now here is an obvious property.Lemma 10.1.2 Let f be a decreasing nonnegative function defined on an interval [a,b] .Then if [a,b] = UL Ik where I, = |ax, bk| and the intervals I, are non overlapping, it followsb m by/ fdA=\) |] fda.a k=1 74kProof: This follows from the computation,” faa ” PAMdR yf pamaa=¥ [pandA = lim | AMda = lim | A\Mdi = d[ f M2 Jaq f M-+oo py a f d ak fNote both sides could equal +-co. llIn all considerations below, we assume / is fairly small, certainly much smaller than R.Thus R—h>0O.279