524 CHAPTER 20. PRODUCT MEASURES

Finally consider finite unions of sets of E . Let E1 and E2 be sets of E . Then

E1∪E2 = (E1 \E2)∪E2 ∈ E

because E1\E2 consists of a finite disjoint union of sets of R and these sets must be disjointfrom the sets of R whose union yields E2 because (E1 \E2)∩E2 = /0. ■

The following corollary is particularly helpful in verifying the conditions of the abovelemma.

Corollary 20.1.3 Let (Z1,R1,E1) and (Z2,R2,E2) be as described in Lemma 20.1.2.Then (Z1×Z2,R,E ) also satisfies the conditions of Lemma 20.1.2 if R is defined as

R ≡{R1×R2 : Ri ∈Ri}

andE ≡{ finite disjoint unions of sets of R}.

Consequently, E is an algebra of sets.

Proof: It is clear /0,Z1×Z2 ∈R. Let A×B and C×D be two elements of R.

A×B∩C×D = (A∩C)× (B∩D) ∈R

by assumption.

(A×B)\ (C×D) = A×

∈E2︷ ︸︸ ︷(B\D)∪

∈E1︷ ︸︸ ︷(A\C)×

∈R2︷ ︸︸ ︷(D∩B) = (A×Q)∪ (P×R)

where Q ∈ E2, P ∈ E1, and R ∈R2.

A

B

C

D

Since A×Q and P×R do not intersect, it follows that the above expression is in Ebecause each of these terms are. ■

20.2 Caratheodory Extension TheoremThe Caratheodory extension theorem is a fundamental result which makes possible theconsideration of measures on infinite products among other things. The idea is that if afinite measure defined only on an algebra is trying to be a measure, then in fact it can beextended to a measure.

Definition 20.2.1 Let E be an algebra of sets of Ω. Thus E contains /0,Ω, andis closed with respect to differences and finite unions. Then µ0 is a finite measure on Emeans µ0 is finitely additive: If Ei,E are sets of E with the Ei disjoint and E = ∪∞

i=1Ei,then µ (E) = ∑

∞i=1 µ (Ei)

524 CHAPTER 20. PRODUCT MEASURESFinally consider finite unions of sets of &. Let E, and Ez be sets of &. ThenE,;\UEn= (Ey \ E2) UE Eebecause EF; \ E> consists of a finite disjoint union of sets of & and these sets must be disjointfrom the sets of whose union yields E because (FE \ E2) VE. = 0.The following corollary is particularly helpful in verifying the conditions of the abovelemma.Corollary 20.1.3 Let (Z,,%,6) and (Z),%2,&) be as described in Lemma 20.1.2.Then (Z, x Zz, %,€) also satisfies the conditions of Lemma 20.1.2 if & is defined asK={Ri x Ry: Ri € Bi}and& ={ finite disjoint unions of sets of &}.Consequently, & is an algebra of sets.Proof: It is clear @,Z, x Z, € Z. Let A x B and C x D be two elements of &.AXBNCxD=(ANC)x(BND)E&by assumption.Eby €é| ER,(A x B)\ (C x D) =A x (B\ D)U(A\C) x (DNB) = (A x Q)U(PX R)where O € &, P€ &, and RE &p.rallillASince A x Q and P x R do not intersect, it follows that the above expression is in &because each of these terms are.20.2 Caratheodory Extension TheoremThe Caratheodory extension theorem is a fundamental result which makes possible theconsideration of measures on infinite products among other things. The idea is that if afinite measure defined only on an algebra is trying to be a measure, then in fact it can beextended to a measure.Definition 20.2.1 Ler € be an algebra of sets of Q. Thus € contains 0,Q, andis closed with respect to differences and finite unions. Then [Up is a finite measure on &means [Uy is finitely additive: If E;,E are sets of € with the E; disjoint and E = Uz, Ej,then u(E) =¥2 W(Ei)