21.3. UNIFORM CONVEXITY OF Lp 549

I want to find the maximum value of this function of θ for θ ∈ [0,2π] . By calculus, thiswill be when the derivative is 0 or at an endpoint. The derivative with respect to θ is 1

2p

times

p2

((1+ r2 +2r cosθ

) p−22 (−2r sinθ)+(2r sinθ)

(1+ r2−2r cosθ

) p−22

)=

p2(2r sinθ)

((1+ r2−2r cosθ

) p−22 −

(1+ r2 +2r cosθ

) p−22

)This equals 0 when θ = 0,π,2π or when θ = π

2 ,3π

2 . At the last two values, the value of thefunction in 21.8 is

12p−1

(1+ r2)p/2 ≤ 1

2(rp +1) .

This follows from convexity of y = xp/2 for p≥ 2. Here is why:

12p−1

(1+ r2)p/2

=2p/2

2p−1

(1+ r2

2

)p/2

≤ 2p/2

2p−112(1+ rp)

At 0 or π, the value of the function in 21.8 is((1+ r2−2r

)p/2+(1+ r2 +2r

)p/2) 1

2p =

(1+ r

2

)p

+

(1− r

2

)p

and from the above lemma, this is no larger than 12 (r

p +1). ■With this corollary, here is the easy Clarkson inequality.

Theorem 21.3.6 Let p≥ 2. Then∥∥∥∥ f +g2

∥∥∥∥p

Lp+

∥∥∥∥ f −g2

∥∥∥∥p

Lp≤ 1

2(∥ f∥p

Lp +∥g∥pLp)

Proof: This follows right away from the above corollary.∫Ω

∣∣∣∣ f +g2

∣∣∣∣p dµ +∫

∣∣∣∣ f −g2

∣∣∣∣p dµ ≤ 12

∫Ω

(| f |p + |g|p)dµ ■

Now it remains to consider the hard Clarkson inequalities. These pertain to p < 2. Firstis the following elementary inequality.

Lemma 21.3.7 For 1 < p < 2, the following inequality holds for all t ∈ [0,1] .(1+ t

2

)q

+

(1− t

2

)q

≤(

12+

12

t p)q/p

where here 1/p+1/q = 1 so q > 2.

Proof: First note that if t = 0 or 1, the inequality holds. Next observe that the maps→ 1−s

1+s maps (0,1) onto (0,1). Replace t with (1− s)/(1+ s). Then the desired inequalityis equivalent to the following for s ∈ (0,1) .(

1s+1

)q

+

(s

s+1

)q

≤(

12+

12

(1− ss+1

)p)q/p

21.3. UNIFORM CONVEXITY OF L? 549I want to find the maximum value of this function of 6 for 6 € [0,27]. By calculus, thiswill be when the derivative is 0 or at an endpoint. The derivative with respect to 0 is +times—2 p-2pre pre§ ( (1+? +2re086) 7 (—2rsin@) + (2rsin@) (1+r? —2rcos@) 7 )p-2 p=2= £ (2rsind) ( (1-47? 27086) 7 —(1+r?+2rcos@) ? )This equals 0 when 6 = 0, 7,27 or when 6 = 5, az At the last two values, the value of thefunction in 21.8 is2) p/2(1+r’) (r? +1).he2-1This follows from convexity of y = x?/? for p > 2. Here is why:p/2 2\ p/2 p/22/2 _ 2 (5°) els wyQp-1 (1 ~ Qp-l 2 — Qp-19At 0 or 7, the value of the function in 21.8 is2 p/2 2 pi2\ 1 (1+r\? 1—r\?(+r —2r)P? + (14? +2r) )e-( : ) +( 5 )and from the above lemma, this is no larger than 5 (7? +1). iWith this corollary, here is the easy Clarkson inequality.Theorem 21.3.6 Let p > 2. ThenI), + |] 8] <5 (lFlle> + llelzy)<3Proof: This follows right away from the above corollary.ealNow it remains to consider the hard Clarkson inequalities. These pertain to p < 2. Firstis the following elementary inequality.f=s|’ I p pd+ 5 dus 5 (\f\/’ +|g\’)du @Q QLemma 21.3.7 For 1 < p < 2, the following inequality holds for allt € {0,1].L+1\4 (1=1)\4_ (1 1,\ 4”—_—_ _ tP(S) Ca) <2")where here 1/p+1/q=1soq>2.Proof: First note that if tf = 0 or 1, the inequality holds. Next observe that the map5 i maps (0, 1) onto (0,1). Replace ¢ with (1 — s) /(1+). Then the desired inequalityis equivalent to the following for s € (0,1).1 q s \@ 1 1/1—s\? q/P— <{—-4+—[{——(5) (5) <(5+3 (Sa) |