22.6. ROOTS OF POSITIVE LINEAR MAPS 597

Now, since An ≤ I, I + · · ·+Am−1n ≤ mI, it follows that

= (I−Am)

(I− 1

m

(I + · · ·+Am−1

n))≥ (I−Am)(I− I) = 0

so by induction, An ≤ I.Claim 2: An ≤ An+1.Proof of Claim 2: From the definition of An, this is true if n = 0 because

A1 = T ≥ 0 = A0.

Suppose true for n. Then from Claim 1,

An+2−An+1 = An+1 +1m

(T −Am

n+1)−[

An +1m(T −Am

n )

]= An+1−An +

1m

(Am

n −Amn+1)

= (An+1−An)− (An+1−An)1m

(Am−1

n+1 +Am−2n+1 An + · · ·+Am−1

n)

≥ (An+1−An)− (An+1−An) I = 0

since each An,An+1 ≤ I, so this proves the claim.Claim 3: An ≥ 0Proof of Claim 3: This is true if n = 0. Suppose it is true for n.

(An+1x,x) = (Anx,x)+1m(T x,x)− 1

m(Am

n x,x)

≥ (Anx,x)+1m(T x,x)− 1

m(Anx,x)≥ 0

because by Proposition 22.6.2, An−Amn = An

(I−Am−1

n)≥ 0 because An ≤ I.

Thus (Anx,x) is increasing and bounded above so it converges. Now let n > k. UsingProposition 22.6.2 AnAk ≥ A2

k and also

(An−Ak)(An +Ak)≤ 2(An−Ak) .

Thus the following holds.

∥Anx−Akx∥2 =((An−Ak)

2 x,x)=(A2

nx,x)−2(AnAkx,x)+

(A2

kx,x)

≤(A2

nx,x)−2(A2

kx,x)+(A2

kx,x)= ((An−Ak)(An +Ak)x,x)

≤ 2 [(Anx,x)− (Akx,x)]

which converges to 0 as k,n→ ∞. Therefore, limn→∞ Anx exists since {Anx} is a Cauchysequence. Let this limit be Ax. Then clearly A is linear. Also, since each An ≥ 0 and selfadjoint, the Cauchy Schwarz inequality implies

|(Ax,y)|= limn→∞|(Anx,y)| ≤ lim sup

n→∞

∣∣∣(Anx,x)1/2 (Any,y)1/2∣∣∣≤ ∥x∥∥y∥

22.6. ROOTS OF POSITIVE LINEAR MAPS 597Now, since Ay <J,J+---+A”~! < ml, it follows that= (Ay) (1-2 (re ba)) > ay) I=) = 9J——mso by induction, A, < /.Claim 2: A, < Ay+1-Proof of Claim 2: From the definition of A,, this is true if n = 0 becauseA, =T >0=Apo.Suppose true for n. Then from Claim 1,1 m 1 mAn+2 —An+1 = Anvit = (T Ani) = Ant = (T—An)1= Anti —An+ = (An — me)1 _ _ _= (An+1 An) = (Anti An) = (Ayn F An T An FF An")= (An+1 —An) _ (An+1 —An)I =0since each A,,An+1 < J, so this proves the claim.Claim 3: A, > 0Proof of Claim 3: This is true if n = 0. Suppose it is true for n.1 1(Angix,x) = (Apx,x)+ on (Tx,x) — n (At’x,x)1 1> (Anx,x)+ - (Tx,x) — - (Anx,x) > 0because by Proposition 22.6.2, Ay —A” =A, (I—A”~') > 0 because A, <I.Thus (A,.x,x) is increasing and bounded above so it converges. Now let n > k. UsingProposition 22.6.2 A,Ax > Az and also(An — Ax) (An +Ax) <2 (An — Ax) .Thus the following holds.\|Anx — Agx||? = ((An — Ay)? x,2) = (Anx,.) —2(A,Agx,x) + (Apx,x)< (Apx,) —2 (Apx,x) + (Azx,x) = ((An — Ag) (An + Ag) X,x)< 2 [(Anx, x) _ (Axx, x)]which converges to 0 as k,n — oo, Therefore, limy_;..Ayx exists since {A,x} is a Cauchysequence. Let this limit be Ax. Then clearly A is linear. Also, since each A, > 0 and selfadjoint, the Cauchy Schwarz inequality implies\(Ax,y)| = lim |(Anx,y)| <lim sup |(Anx,x)"/? (Any.y)"/?| < [lan-eoo