25.1. PARTITIONS OF UNITY AND STONE’S THEOREM 709

Proof: By Stone’s theorem, there exists a locally finite open refinement F of S coveringS. For F ∈ F

gF (x)≡ dist(x,FC)

Letφ F (x)≡ (∑{gF (x) : F ∈ F})−1gF (x) .

Now∑{gF (x) : F ∈ F}

is a continuous function because if x ∈ S, then there exists an open set W with x ∈W andW has nonempty intersection with only finitely many sets of F ∈ F. Then for y ∈W,

∑{gF (y) : F ∈ F}=n

∑i=1

gFi (y).

Since F is a cover of S,∑{gF (x) : F ∈ F} ̸= 0

for any x ∈ S. Hence φ F is continuous. This also shows φ F (x) = 0 for all but finitely manyF ∈ F. It is obvious that

∑{φ F (x) : F ∈ F}= 1

from the definition.Let z ∈ S. Then there is an open set W containing z such that W has nonempty intersec-

tion with only finitely many F ∈F . Thus for y,x ∈W,∣∣∣φ Fj(x)−φ Fj

(y)∣∣∣≤ ∣∣∣∣gFj (x)∑

ni=1 gFi (y)−gFj (y)∑

ni=1 gFi (x)

∑ni=1 gFi (x)∑

ni=1 gFi (y)

∣∣∣∣If F is not one of these Fi, then gF (x) = φ F (x) = φ F (y) = gF (y) = 0. Thus there is nothingto show for these. It suffices to consider the ones above. Restricting W if necessary, we canassume that for x ∈W,

∑F

gF (x) =n

∑i=1

gFi (x)> δ > 0, gFj (x)< ∆ < ∞, j ≤ n

Then, simplifying the above, and letting x,y ∈W, for each j ≤ n,∣∣∣φ Fj(x)−φ Fj

(y)∣∣∣≤ 1

δ2

∣∣∣∣ gFj (x)∑F gF (y)−gFj (y)∑F gF (y)+gFj (y)∑F gF (y)−gFj (y)∑F gF (x)

∣∣∣∣≤ 1

δ2 ∆∣∣gFj (x)−gFj (y)

∣∣+ 1

δ2 ∆

n

∑i=1|gFi (y)−gFi (x)|

≤ ∆

δ2 d (x,y)+

δ2 nd (x,y) = (n+1)

δ2 d (x,y)

Thus on this set W containing z, all φ F are Lipschitz continuous with Lipschitz constant(n+1) ∆

δ2 . ■

The functions described above are called a partition of unity subordinate to the opencover S. A useful observation is contained in the following corollary.

25.1. PARTITIONS OF UNITY AND STONE’S THEOREM 709Proof: By Stone’s theorem, there exists a locally finite open refinement § of G coveringS. For F € ¥8r (x) = dist (x, F°)LetOp (x) = (Viger (x): F © S}) ‘gr (x).NowViger (*): F € 5}is a continuous function because if x € S, then there exists an open set W with x € W andW has nonempty intersection with only finitely many sets of F € §. Then for y € W,Viger (y):F €3}= ¥ gr (y).i=lSince § is a cover of S,Vise (x): F € 5} 40for any x € S. Hence @; is continuous. This also shows @; (x) = 0 for all but finitely manyF €§. It is obvious thatVier): Fes}=1from the definition.Let z € S. Then there is an open set W containing z such that W has nonempty intersec-tion with only finitely many F € ¥. Thus for y,x € W,8F; (x) LiL 8m (Y) — BF; (Y) Li 8m; (2)V1 8h (*) Li 8A (y)If F is not one of these Fj, then gr (x) = $; (x) = op (y) = gr (y) =0. Thus there is nothingto show for these. It suffices to consider the ones above. Restricting W if necessary, we canassume that for x € W,Or, ()-O,()| <nYer (x) = Vi ge (x) > 6 >0, F(x) <A<, j<nF i=lThen, simplifying the above, and letting x, y € W, for each j <n,6,06, 0] S558F; (x) Ur 8F (Y) — 88; (Y) Lr Be (Y)+88; (Y) Lr BF (Y) — 85; (Y) Le Be (x)1 a.< sz Alen @) — 8m) 0) + 54 Ven) 8, 0)i=]A A A< 52d oy) + and (ay) = (n+ 1) 52d)Thus on this set W containing z, all @, are Lipschitz continuous with Lipschitz constant(n+1) 3.0The functions described above are called a partition of unity subordinate to the opencover G. A useful observation is contained in the following corollary.