822 CHAPTER 30. CONTINUOUS STOCHASTIC PROCESSES

Proof: By Lemma 30.1.1 X is uniformly stochastically continuous and so there existsa sequence of positive numbers, {ρn} such that if |s− t|< ρn, then

P([∥X (t)−X (s)∥ ≥ 1

2n

])≤ 1

2n . (30.18)

Then let{

tn0 , t

n1 , · · · , tn

mn

}be a partition of [0,T ] in which

∣∣tni − tn

i−1

∣∣< ρn. Now define Xn asfollows:

Xn (t)(ω) ≡mn

∑i=1

X(tni−1)(ω)X[tn

i−1,tni )(t)

Xn (T ) ≡ X (T ) .

Then (s,ω)→ Xn (s,ω) for (s,ω) ∈ [0, t]×Ω is obviously B([0, t])×Ft measurable. Con-sider the set, A on which {Xn (t,ω)} is a Cauchy sequence. This set is of the form

A = ∩∞n=1∪∞

m=1∩p,q≥m

[∥∥Xp−Xq∥∥< 1

n

]and so it is a B(I)×F measurable set and A∩ [0, t]×Ω is B([0, t])×Ft measurable foreach t ≤ T because each Xq in the above has the property that its restriction to [0, t]×Ω isB([0, t])×Ft measurable. Now define

Y (t,ω)≡{

limn→∞ Xn (t,ω) if (t,ω) ∈ A0 if (t,ω) /∈ A

I claim that for each t, Y (t,ω) = X (t,ω) for a.e. ω. To see this, consider 30.18. Fromthe construction of Xn, it follows that for each t,

P([∥Xn (t)−X (t)∥ ≥ 1

2n

])≤ 1

2n

Also, for a fixed t, if Xn (t,ω) fails to converge to X (t,ω) , then ω must be in infinitelymany of the sets,

Bn ≡[∥Xn (t)−X (t)∥ ≥ 1

2n

]which is a set of measure zero by the Borel Cantelli lemma. Recall why this is so.

P(∩∞k=1∪∞

n=k Bn)≤∞

∑n=k

P(Bn)<1

2k−1

Therefore, for each t,(t,ω)∈A for a.e. ω. Hence X (t) =Y (t) a.e. and so Y is a measurableversion of X . Y is adapted because the filtration is normal and hence Ft contains all sets ofmeasure zero. Therefore, Y (t) differs from X (t) on a set which is Ft measurable. ■

There is a more specialized situation in which the measurability of a stochastic processautomatically implies it is adapted. Furthermore, this can be defined easily in terms of a π

system of sets.

Definition 30.3.11 Let Ft be a filtration on (Ω,F ,P) and denote by P∞ thesmallest σ algebra of sets of [0,∞)×Ω containing the sets

(s, t]×F,F ∈Fs {0}×F, F ∈F0.

822 CHAPTER 30. CONTINUOUS STOCHASTIC PROCESSESProof: By Lemma 30.1.1 X is uniformly stochastically continuous and so there existsa sequence of positive numbers, {p,,} such that if |s—t| < p,,, thenp([ix@-xolez]) <> (20.18)Then let {1 ,77,-+- 27, } be a partition of [0,7] in which |r? — 1? ,| < p,,. Now define X,, asfollows:myLx (17.1) (@) Zi, (0)X,(T) = X(T).Xn (t) (@)Then (s,@) + X,(s,@) for (s, @) € [0,¢] x Q is obviously B ([0,t]) x FA; measurable. Con-sider the set, A on which {X,, (t, @)} is a Cauchy sequence. This set is of the formwo co 1A= Ona1 Um=1 Op,gem IX —X,|| < |and so it is a B() x ¥ measurable set and AM [0,1] x Q is B((0,t]) x F, measurable foreach t < T because each Xj in the above has the property that its restriction to [0,1] x Q isB([0,t]) x ¥; measurable. Now definelimy—yooXn (t,@) if (t,@) EArino)={ Oif (t,0) ¢AI claim that for each t, Y (t,@) = X (t,@) for a.e. @. To see this, consider 30.18. Fromthe construction of X;,,, it follows that for each f,(ia -xinl= 5]) <5Also, for a fixed r, if X, (t,@) fails to converge to X (t,@), then @ must be in infinitelymany of the sets,1Br= [Id -X Ol 55 |which is a set of measure zero by the Borel Cantelli lemma. Recall why this is so._ 1P(Oya1 Un Bn) S Ld PBn) < FETn=Therefore, for each t, (t,@) € A for a.e. w. Hence X (t) = Y (t) a.e. and so Y is a measurableversion of X. Y is adapted because the filtration is normal and hence .¥; contains all sets ofmeasure zero. Therefore, Y (t) differs from X (t) on a set which is -¥; measurable. llThere is a more specialized situation in which the measurability of a stochastic processautomatically implies it is adapted. Furthermore, this can be defined easily in terms of a 7system of sets.Definition 30.3.11 Let %, be a filtration on (Q,.F,P) and denote by F.. thesmallest o algebra of sets of [(0,°¢) x Q containing the sets(s,t] xX F,F EF, {O}xF, Fe Fo.