31.5. CONTINUOUS SUB-MARTINGALE CONVERGENCE 849

31.5 Continuous Sub-martingale ConvergenceHere, {Y (t)} will be a continuous sub-martingale and a < b. Let X (t) ≡ (Y (t)−a)++aso X (0)≥ a. Then X is also a sub-martingale. It is an increasing convex function of one. IfY (t) has an upcrossing of [a,b] , then X (t) starts off at a and ends up at least as large as b.If X (t) has an upcrossing of [a,b] then it must start off at a since it cannot be smaller andit ends up at least as large as b. Thus we can count the upcrossings of Y (t) by consideringthe upcrossings of X (t) and X (t) is always at least as large as a.

The next task is to consider an upcrossing estimate as was done before for discretesub-martingales.

τ0 ≡ min(inf{t > 0 : X (t) = a} ,M) ,

τ1 ≡ min(inf{

t > 0 : (X (t ∨ τ0)−X (τ0))+ = b−a},M),

τ2 ≡ min(inf{

t > 0 : (X (τ1)−X (t ∨ τ1))+ = b−a},M),

τ3 ≡ min(inf{

t > 0 : (X (t ∨ τ2)−X (τ2))+ = b−a},M),

τ4 ≡ min(inf{

t > 0 : (X (τ3)−X (t ∨ τ3))+ = b−a},M),

...

If X (t) is never a, then τ0 ≡M where we assume t ∈ [0,M] and there are no upcrossings.It is obvious τ1 ≥ τ0 since otherwise, the inequality could not hold. Thus the evens haveX (τ2k) = a and X (τ2k+1) = b. The following lemma follows from Corollary 31.3.14.

Lemma 31.5.1 The above τ i are stopping times for t ∈ [0,M].

Note that in the above, if η = M, then σ = M also. Thus in the definition of the τ i, ifany τ i = M, it follows that also τ i+1 = M and so there is no change in the stopping times.Also note that these stopping times τ i are increasing as i increases.

Let

UnM[a,b] ≡ lim

ε→0

n

∑k=0

X (τ2k+1)−X (τ2k)

ε +X (τ2k+1)−X (τ2k)

Note that if an upcrossing occurs after τ2k on [0,M], then τ2k+1 > τ2k because there existst such that

(X (t ∨ τ2k)−X (τ2k))+ = b−a

However, you could have τ2k+1 > τ2k without an upcrossing occuring. This happens whenτ2k < M and τ2k+1 = M which may mean that X (t) never again climbs to b. You break thesum into those terms where X (τ2k+1)−X (τ2k) = b− a and those where this is less thanb− a. Suppose for a fixed ω, the terms where the difference is b− a are for k ≤ m. Thenthere might be a last term for which X (τ2k+1)−X (τ2k)< b−a because it fails to completethe up crossing. There is only one of these at k = m+1. Then the above sum is

≤ 1b−a

m

∑k=0

X (τ2k+1)−X (τ2k)+X (M)−a

ε +X (M)−a

≤ 1b−a

n

∑k=0

X (τ2k+1)−X (τ2k)+X (M)−a

ε +X (M)−a

≤ 1b−a

n

∑k=0

X (τ2k+1)−X (τ2k)+1

31.5. CONTINUOUS SUB-MARTINGALE CONVERGENCE 84931.5 Continuous Sub-martingale ConvergenceHere, {Y (t)} will be a continuous sub-martingale and a < b. Let X (t) = (Y (t)—a), +aso X (0) >a. Then X is also a sub-martingale. It is an increasing convex function of one. IfY (t) has an upcrossing of [a,b], then X (+) starts off at a and ends up at least as large as b.If X (t) has an upcrossing of [a,b] then it must start off at a since it cannot be smaller andit ends up at least as large as b. Thus we can count the upcrossings of Y (t) by consideringthe upcrossings of X (t) and X (t) is always at least as large as a.The next task is to consider an upcrossing estimate as was done before for discretesub-martingales.T = min(inf{t>0:X(t)=a},M),tT = min(inf{t>0:(X(tV t%) —X(t0)), =b—a},M),m1 = nine ae eee a\,M),73 = min (inf {1 > 0: (X(tVt X (t2)), =b—a},M),4 = min int {> 0: (X (73 \_ even =b—a},M),If X (t) is never a, then To = M where we assume tf € [0, M] and there are no upcrossings.It is obvious 7; > To since otherwise, the inequality could not hold. Thus the evens haveX (72%) =a and X (T2441) = b. The following lemma follows from Corollary 31.3.14.Lemma 31.5.1 The above 1; are stopping times for t € {0,M].Note that in the above, if 7 = M, then o = M also. Thus in the definition of the 7;, ifany T; = M, it follows that also t;,; = M and so there is no change in the stopping times.Also note that these stopping times T; are increasing as i increases.Lety™ = ji X (Toxe+1) —X (Tx)[a,b] = hm xX _X£90 Ah E+-X (T2K41) (Tx)Note that if an upcrossing occurs after T2, on [0,M], then T2,41 > T2x because there existst such that(X (t V Tx) —X (Tx)) 4 =b-aHowever, you could have 72,41 > 72, without an upcrossing occuring. This happens whenTx <M and 24; =M which may mean that X (rt) never again climbs to b. You break thesum into those terms where X (2441) — X (T2,) = b—a and those where this is less thanb—a. Suppose for a fixed @, the terms where the difference is b—a are for k < m. Thenthere might be a last term for which X (T2441) —X (Tox) < b—a because it fails to completethe up crossing. There is only one of these at k = m+ 1. Then the above sum isa X (M)—a< X ( ——S 52 — (Tae+1) — X (Tox) + €+X(M)—an X(M)—a< _s 4S 5 “adh (Tax41) ~X (TK) + Sy (My —n< —_ yx (Tox41) —X (Tx) +14 5=0