31.7. THE SPACE M pT (E) 857

Proof: First it is good to observe that supt∈[0,T ] ∥M (t)∥p is measurable. This followsbecause of the continuity of t →M (t) . Let D be a dense countable set in [0,T ] . Then bycontinuity,

supt∈[0,T ]

∥M (t)∥p = supt∈D∥M (t)∥p

and the expression on the right is measurable because D is countable.Next it is necessary to show this is a norm. It is clear that ∥M∥M p

T (E) ≥ 0 and equals

0 only if 0 = E(

supt∈[0,T ] ∥M (t)∥p)

which requires M (t) = 0 for all t for ω off a set ofmeasure zero so that M = 0. It is also clear that ∥αM∥M p

T (E) = |α|∥M∥M pT (E) . It remains

to check the triangle inequality. Let M,N ∈M pT (E) .

∥M+N∥M pT (E) ≡ E

(sup

t∈[0,T ]∥M (t)+N (t)∥p

)1/p

≤ E

(sup

t∈[0,T ](∥M (t)∥+∥N (t)∥)p

)1/p

≤ E

((sup

t∈[0,T ]∥M (t)∥+ sup

t∈[0,T ]∥N (t)∥

)p)1/p

(∫Ω

(sup

t∈[0,T ]∥M (t)∥+ sup

t∈[0,T ]∥N (t)∥

)p

dP

)1/p

(∫Ω

(sup

t∈[0,T ]∥M (t)∥

)p

dP

)1/p

+

(∫Ω

(sup

t∈[0,T ]∥N (t)∥

)p

dP

)1/p

≡ ∥M∥M pT (E)+∥N∥M p

T (E)

Next consider the claim that M pT (E) is a Banach space. Let {Mn} be a Cauchy se-

quence. Then

E

(sup

t∈[0,T ]∥Mn (t)−Mm (t)∥p

)→ 0 (31.19)

as m,n→ ∞. Now

P

(sup

t∈[0,T ]∥Mn (t)−Mm (t)∥> λ

)≤ 1

λp E

(sup

t∈[0,T ]∥Mn (t)−Mm (t)∥

)p

Therefore, one can extract a subsequence{

Mnk

}such that

E

(sup

t∈[0,T ]

∥∥Mnk (t)−Mnk+1 (t)∥∥p

)≤ 4−k.

31.7. THE SPACE 4 (E) 857Proof: First it is good to observe that sup,<(9,7j || (t)||’ is measurable. This followsbecause of the continuity of t + M(t). Let D be a dense countable set in [0,7]. Then bycontinuity,sup ||M(r)||’ = sup ||M (1)|”te[0,7] teDand the expression on the right is measurable because D is countable.Next it is necessary to show this is a norm. It is clear that IM ||_ve(e) > 0 and equals0 only ifO=E (sup.cjo.r ||M (t) I’) which requires M (t) = 0 for all t for @ off a set ofmeasure zero so that M = 0. It is also clear that |@M||_ “e(r) = |a| IM||_2e(e) . It remainsto check the triangle inequality. Let M,N € .@f (E).1/pIM+N|l vee) =F ( sup ||M (t) a)te[0,T]1/pe sup (costco)<te [0,7]P\ 1/p< e(( sup ||M(¢)||-+ sup woot )te [0,7] te[0,7]Pp 1/p= ( | [se |M()||+ sup wen ir)Q \tE[0,7] te[0,T]Dp 1/p Pp \/p< ( | [xe imo) ir) +( / [xe weal] ir)Q \tE[0,7] Q \tE[0,7]Mee) + INL ace)Next consider the claim that #7 (E) is a Banach space. Let {M,} be a Cauchy se-quence. Thene( sup ||M, (t)- Min oi) 0 (31.19)te[0,T]as m,n — oo. NowPr( sup ||Mn(t) —Mm (¢)]| >2) < te ( sup (Mate(0,7]Therefore, one can extract a subsequence {Mn, such thatte[0,7]e| sup ||Mn, (0) —Maz ol) <4%,