32.3. THE QUADRATIC VARIATION 869

and so from Proposition 32.1.4 applied to ξ k ≡M(τ

n+1′k

)−M

n+1k

),

E(∥Pn (t)−Pn+1 (t)∥2

)≤(

2−2nE(∥M (t)∥2

)). (32.9)

Now t→ Pn (t) is continuous because it is a finite sum of continuous functions. It is alsothe case that {Pn (t)} is a martingale. To see this use Lemma 32.1.1. Let σ be a stoppingtime having two values. Then using Corollary 32.1.3 and the Doob optional samplingtheorem, Theorem 31.3.16

E

(q

∑k=0

(M (τn

k) ,(M(σ ∧ τ

nk+1)−M (σ ∧ τ

nk))))

=q

∑k=0

E((

M (τnk) ,(M(σ ∧ τ

nk+1)−M (σ ∧ τ

nk))))

=q

∑k=0

E((

E(M (τn

k) ,(M(σ ∧ τ

nk+1)−M (σ ∧ τ

nk)))|Fτn

k

))=

q

∑k=0

E((

M (τnk) ,E

(M(σ ∧ τ

nk+1)−M (σ ∧ τ

nk))|Fτn

k

))=

q

∑k=0

E((

M (τnk) ,E

(M(σ ∧ τ

nk+1∧ τ

nk)−M (σ ∧ τ

nk))))

= 0

Note the Doob theorem applies because σ ∧τnk+1 is a bounded stopping time due to the fact

σ has only two values. Similarly

E

(q

∑k=0

(M (τn

k) ,(M(t ∧ τ

nk+1)−M (t ∧ τ

nk))))

=q

∑k=0

E((

M (τnk) ,(M(t ∧ τ

nk+1)−M (t ∧ τ

nk))))

=q

∑k=0

E((

E(M (τn

k) ,(M(t ∧ τ

nk+1)−M (t ∧ τ

nk)))|Fτn

k

))=

q

∑k=0

E((

M (τnk) ,E

(M(t ∧ τ

nk+1)−M (t ∧ τ

nk))|Fτn

k

))=

q

∑k=0

E((

M (τnk) ,E

(M(t ∧ τ

nk+1∧ τ

nk)−M (t ∧ τ

nk))))

= 0

It follows each partial sum for Pn (t) is a martingale. As shown above, these partial sumsconverge in L2 (Ω) and so it follows that Pn (t) is also a martingale. Note the Doob theoremapplies because t ∧ τn

k+1 is a bounded stopping time.I want to argue that Pn is a Cauchy sequence in M 2

T (R). By Theorem 31.4.3 andcontinuity of Pn which yields appropriate measurability in supt≤T |Pn (t)−Pn+1 (t)| ,

E

((supt≤T|Pn (t)−Pn+1 (t)|

)2)1/2

≤ 2E(|Pn (T )−Pn+1 (T )|2

)1/2

32.3. THE QUADRATIC VARIATION 869and so from Proposition 32.1.4 applied to §, = M (tit!) —M (ti"'),E(IIP()—Pasi ll’) < (2% (MM IP)) (32.9)Now t — P,, (t) is continuous because it is a finite sum of continuous functions. It is alsothe case that {P, (t)} is a martingale. To see this use Lemma 32.1.1. Let o be a stoppingtime having two values. Then using Corollary 32.1.3 and the Doob optional samplingtheorem, Theorem 31.3.16E (x (M(t). (M(OAt%41) -M(ons)))k=0((M (ti), (M (OA t,,) —M(OATt))))TMsbs>lloE((E(M (zh), (M(oA thy.) —M(oAzh))) |Fet))IMsiroOIMs& ((M (af) 6 (M (oA th.) -M(oA 2) |Fa))ioOE((M(z}).E(M (6 At}, Ath) —M(oAth)))) =0l|MsirOoNote the Doob theorem applies because o / T, , is a bounded stopping time due to the facto has only two values. SimilarlyE (x (M (ct), (M (th) -mune))k=0((M (ti) (MA th) — M(t %2))))l|IMsbry8) (M(t th,1) —M (ch) Fer) )>llo(M(x) E(M (tA th) —M (tA th) \Fxt))II lIMs iMses] es]a.es]=airoE((M(ti),E(M (tA ti, At) —M (tA t%)))) =0IMsioIt follows each partial sum for P, (t) is a martingale. As shown above, these partial sumsconverge in L? (Q) and so it follows that P, (t) is also a martingale. Note the Doob theoremapplies because ¢ \ Tj, , is a bounded stopping time.I want to argue that P, is a Cauchy sequence in M; (R). By Theorem 31.4.3 andcontinuity of P, which yields appropriate measurability in sup,_r |P, (t) — Pai (t)|,1/23\ 1/2E [(wpi (t) — Prva ol) <2E ((P (7) — Past (7)")t<T