10.1. STIRLING’S FORMULA 229

so the formula holds in this case. Suppose it holds for m. Then from the above reductionidentity and induction,∫

π/2

0sin2m+2 (x)dx =

2m+12(m+1)

∫π/2

0sin2m (x)dx

=2m+1

2(m+1)(2m−1) · · ·1

2m(2m−2) · · ·2π

2.

The second claim is proved similarly.Then using the reduction identity and the above,

2m+12m

≥∫ π/2

0 sin2m (x)dx2m

2m+1∫ π/2

0 sin2m−1 (x)dx=

∫ π/20 sin2m (x)dx∫ π/2

0 sin2m+1 (x)dx=

2(2m+1)

(2m−1)2 (2m−3)2 · · ·122m (m!)2 ≥ 1

It follows from the squeezing theorem that

limm→∞

12m+1

22m (m!)2

(2m−1)2 (2m−3)2 · · ·1=

π

2

This exceedingly interesting formula is Wallis’ formula.Now multiply both the top and the bottom of the expression on the left by

(2m)2 (2(m−1))2 · · ·22

which is 22m (m!)2 . This is another version of the Wallis formula.

π

2= lim

m→∞

22m

2m+122m (m!)2 (m!)2

((2m)!)2

It follows that √π

2= lim

m→∞

22m√

2m+1(m!)2

(2m)!= lim

m→∞

22m√

2m(m!)2

(2m)!(10.2)

Now with this result, it is possible to find c in Stirling’s formula. Recall

limm→∞

m!mm+(1/2)e−mc

= 1 = limm→∞

mm+(1/2)e−mcm!

In particular, replacing m with 2m,

limm→∞

(2m)!

(2m)2m+(1/2) e−2mc= lim

m→∞

(2m)2m+(1/2) e−2mc(2m)!

= 1

Therefore, from 10.2,√

π

2 =

limm→∞

22m√

2m

(mm+(1/2)e−mc

m!

)2(m!)2(

(2m)2m+(1/2)e−2mc2m!

)(2m)!

= limm→∞

22m√

2m

(mm+(1/2)e−mc

)2((2m)2m+(1/2) e−2mc

)

10.1. STIRLING’S FORMULA 229so the formula holds in this case. Suppose it holds for m. Then from the above reductionidentity and induction,n/2 Q2m+1 2/2- 2m+2 «2msin x)dx = ——— [ sin®” (x) dxi (x) 2(m+1) Jo ©)2m+1 (2m—1)---1 22(m+1) 2m(2m—2)---2 2°The second claim is proved similarly. JThen using the reduction identity and the above,2m+1 s Ie ° sin?” (x)dx ml ° sin?” (x) dx2m ty ai * sin?! (x) dx ha * sin? (x) dx1 (2m—1)? (2m—3)*-++1= = (2m+1) : >12 22” (m!)It follows from the squeezing theorem thati 1 22" (m!)? baim = =mo 2m+1 (2m—1)?(2m—3)?---1 2This exceedingly interesting formula is Wallis’ formula.Now multiply both the top and the bottom of the expression on the left by(2m)? (2(m—1))°---2?which is 27” (m!)* . This is another version of the Wallis formula.It follows that7 227 (mi)? 2 (mt)?—= lim = lim2 m—oo J2m+1 (2m)! m0 4/Im (2m)!Now with this result, it is possible to find c in Stirling’s formula. Recall(10.2)ml m@t(1/2) e-melim ———Y——_ = 1= limmo yint+(1/2) e—me m—yoo m!In particular, replacing m with 2m,2m)! dy \27H(1/2) o—2mlim (2m) = tim CM) am—so0 (2m)? (1/2) e-2me M300 (2m)!Therefore, from 10.2, JF =m(1/2) ome \* 2 m+(1/2),-m,.\Q2m ee) (m!) 22m (m +(1/ Je c)lim ; = lim2m!mo \/Im (er) (2m)! me \/2m (2m?) e?mc)