5.3. CONSERVATIVE VECTOR FIELDS 125

Proof: Consider the first claim about the intervals. It is obvious if m = 1. Supposethen that it holds for m−1 and you have m intervals and curves. By induction, there exists[ĉ, d̂]

and γ̂ such that γ̂([

ĉ, d̂])

= ∪m−1k=1 γk ([ak,bk]) with γ̂ (ĉ) = γ1 (a1) , γ̂

(d̂)= γ (bm−1) ,

and by assumption, γk (bk) = γk+1 (ak) for k ≤ m− 1. I will describe an extension of γ̂ to[ĉ, d̂ +bm−am

]which will be defined as [c,d]. Thus the new interval coming after

[ĉ, d̂]

will be[d̂, d̂ +bm−am

]γ (t)≡

{γ̂ (t) if t ∈

[ĉ, d̂]

γm(t− d̂ +am

)if t ∈

[d̂, d̂ +bm−am

]Now consider the claim in 5.20. In writing the Riemann sums, it can always be assumed

that the end points of the intervals γ−1 (γk ([ak,bk])) are in the partition since includingthese points makes ∥P∥ no larger and the integral is defined in terms of smallness of ∥P∥.Therefore, 5.20 follows from Theorem 5.1.3 applied to two different parametrizations ofγ∗k , the one coming from γ and the one coming from γk.

Finally consider the last claim. Say γ : [a,b]→ Rn. Then −γ (t) ≡ γ (a+b− t) and soa typical Riemann sum for −γ would be

n

∑i=1

f(γ (a+b− τ i)) · (γ (a+b− ti)− γ (a+b− ti−1)) , τ i ∈ [ti−1, ti]

=−n

∑i=1

f(γ (a+b− τ i)) · (γ (a+b− ti−1)− γ (a+b− ti))

Now a + b− τ i ∈ [a+b− ti,a+b− ti−1] and so the above is just a Riemann sum for−∫

γf·dγ . Thus, in the limit as ∥P∥→ 0, one obtains −

∫γ

f·dγ . ■

5.3 Conservative Vector FieldsRecall the gradient of a scalar function x→ F (x) ,

(Fx1 · · · Fxp

)T ≡ DFT the trans-pose of the matrix of the derivative of F . (It is best not to worry too much about thisdistinction between the gradient and the derivative at this point.)

Theorem 5.3.1 Let γ : [a,b]→ Rp be continuous and of bounded variation. Alsosuppose ∇F = f on Ω, an open set containing γ∗ and f is continuous on Ω. Then

∫γ

f ·dγ =

F (γ (b))−F (γ (a)) .

Proof: By Theorem 5.2.3 there exists η ∈C1 ([a,b]) such that γ (a)=η (a) , and γ (b)=

η (b) such that∣∣∣∫γ

f ·dγ−∫

ηf ·dη

∣∣∣< ε . Then from Theorem 5.2.5, since η is in C1 ([a,b]) ,it follows from the chain rule and the fundamental theorem of calculus that∫

η

f ·dη =∫ b

af(η (t))η

′ (t)dt =∫ b

a

ddt

F (η (t))dt

= F (η (b))−F (η (a)) = F (γ (b))−F (γ (a)) .

Therefore,∣∣∣(F (γ (b))−F (γ (a)))−

∫γ

f ·dγ

∣∣∣ < ε and since ε > 0 is arbitrary, this provesthe theorem. ■

5.3. CONSERVATIVE VECTOR FIELDS 125Proof: Consider the first claim about the intervals. It is obvious if m= 1. Supposethen that it holds for m— 1 and you have m intervals and curves. By induction, there exists[é,d] and ¥ such that ¥([@,d]) =U? % ([ax, bel) with 7(2) = y, (a1), ¥(d) = (bm-1),and by assumption, ¥; (bx) = Yy4.1 (ax) for k <m-— 1. I will describe an extension of ¥ to[ed +bm— Am| which will be defined as [c,d]. Thus the new interval coming after [2,d]will be [d,d +m —4am|y(t) = 7(t) ifr € [2,d] _.mn (t-d +m) ift € [d,d + bm —am|Now consider the claim in 5.20. In writing the Riemann sums, it can always be assumedthat the end points of the intervals y~! (¥; ([ax,,])) are in the partition since includingthese points makes ||P|| no larger and the integral is defined in terms of smallness of ||P].Therefore, 5.20 follows from Theorem 5.1.3 applied to two different parametrizations ofY;, the one coming from ¥ and the one coming from ¥;,.Finally consider the last claim. Say y: [a,b] + R”. Then —y(t) = y(a+b-—t) and soa typical Riemann sum for —Y would beMs:f(y(a+b—%))-(y(a+b—-ti) —y(a+b—t-1)), Ti © [t-1,6i]i=1n= —) f(y(a+b—-1t)):(y(a+b-t-1)—y(a+b-t))i=lNow a+b—17; € [a+b-—t;,a+b—t;_1| and so the above is just a Riemann sum for— J, f-dy. Thus, in the limit as ||P|| + 0, one obtains — f,f-dy. i5.3. Conservative Vector Fields. . TRecall the gradient of a scalar function x > F (x) , ( Fy OK, ) = DF’ the trans-pose of the matrix of the derivative of F. (It is best not to worry too much about thisdistinction between the gradient and the derivative at this point.)Theorem 5.3.1 Let y: [a,b] — R? be continuous and of bounded variation. Alsosuppose VF =f on Q, an open set containing Y* and f is continuous on Q. Then Jf: dy=F (y(b))—F (y(a)).Proof: By Theorem 5.2.3 there exists 1 € C! ([a,b]) such that y(a) = n (a), and y(b) =71 (b) such that | [,f-dy— J, f-an | <€. Then from Theorem 5.2.5, since 7 is in C! ((a,b]),it follows from the chain rule and the fundamental theorem of calculus that[tan1Therefore, \(F (y(b)) — F (y(a))) - [,f-ay| < € and since € > 0 is arbitrary, this provesthe theorem. Hib bd[tana [Sr a@arF (n(b)) ~F (n(a)) =F (1(0)) -F (r(a)).