192 CHAPTER 8. POSITIVE LINEAR FUNCTIONALS

≤n

∑i=1

(|t0|+ ti + ε)(µ(Ei)+ ε/n)−|t0|µ(spt( f ))

≤ |t0|

µ(spt( f ))︷ ︸︸ ︷n

∑i=1

µ(Ei)+ε

nn |t0|+∑

itiµ (Ei)

+∑i

tiε

n+∑

iεµ (Ei)+

ε2

n−|t0|µ(spt( f ))

≤ ε |t0|+ ε (|t0|+ |b|)+ εµ(spt( f ))+ ε2 +∑

itiµ (Ei)

≤ ε |t0|+ ε (|t0|+ |b|)+2εµ(spt( f ))+ ε2 +

n

∑i=1

ti−1µ(Ei)

≤ ε (2 |t0|+ |b|+2µ(spt( f ))+ ε)+∫

f dµ

Since ε > 0 is arbitrary, L f ≤∫

f dµ for all f ∈Cc(X), f real. Hence equality holds because

−L( f ) = L(− f )≤∫

(− f )dµ =−∫

f dµ

so L( f ) ≥∫

f dµ . Thus L f =∫

f dµ for all f ∈Cc(X). Just apply the result for real func-tions to the real and imaginary parts of f . ■

In fact the two outer measures are equal on all sets. Thus the measurable sets are exactlythe same and so they have the same σ algebra of measurable sets and are equal on this σ

algebra. Of course, if you were willing to consider σ algebras for which the measuresare not complete, then you might have different σ algebras, but note that if you define themeasurable sets in terms of Caratheodory as done above, the σ algebras are also unique.

As a special case of the above,

Corollary 8.2.8 Let µ be a Borel measure. Also let µ (B) < ∞ for every ball B con-tained in a metric space X which has closed balls compact. Then µ must be regular.

Proof: This follows right away from using the Riesz representation theorem above onthe functional

L f ≡∫

f dµ

for all f ∈Cc (X). ■Here is another interesting result.

Corollary 8.2.9 Let X be a random variable with values in Rp. Then λ X is an innerand outer regular measure defined on B (Rp).

This is obvious when you recall the definition of the distribution measure for the randomvector X. λ X (E) ≡ P(ω : X(ω) ∈ E) where this means the probability that X is in E aBorel set of Rp. It is a finite Borel measure and so it is regular.

There is an interesting application of regularity to approximation of a measurable func-tion with one that is continuous.

192 CHAPTER 8. POSITIVE LINEAR FUNCTIONALSn<P) (\to| +4 +€) (u(E,) + €/n) — |to|u(spt(f))i=lL(spt(f))—_—_——u €< |tol|)’ (Ei) + mu \to| + )° tim (Ei)i=l i2+ ya +)reu (E;) + — — |to| u(spt(f))lA€ |to| + € (|to| + |b|) + €n(spt(f)) +e? + ti (Ei)lA€ to) +e (tol + |b|) +2en (spt(f)) +e? + tam (E:)i=l< €(2|t0| + || +2m(spt(f)) +e) + f FawSince € > Ois arbitrary, Lf < f fd for all f €C.(X), f real. Hence equality holds because-L(f)=L(-f) < | (-fau =~ | fayso L(f) > f fdu. Thus Lf = f fd for all f € C.(X). Just apply the result for real func-tions to the real and imaginary parts of f.In fact the two outer measures are equal on all sets. Thus the measurable sets are exactlythe same and so they have the same o algebra of measurable sets and are equal on this oalgebra. Of course, if you were willing to consider o algebras for which the measuresare not complete, then you might have different o algebras, but note that if you define themeasurable sets in terms of Caratheodory as done above, the o algebras are also unique.As a special case of the above,Corollary 8.2.8 Let u be a Borel measure. Also let u(B) < % for every ball B con-tained in a metric space X which has closed balls compact. Then bt must be regular.Proof: This follows right away from using the Riesz representation theorem above onthe functionalLf = | fafor all f €C,(X). iHere is another interesting result.Corollary 8.2.9 Let X be a random variable with values in R?. Then Ax is an innerand outer regular measure defined on B(R?).This is obvious when you recall the definition of the distribution measure for the randomvector X. Ax (E) = P(@: X(@) € E) where this means the probability that X is in EF aBorel set of R?. It is a finite Borel measure and so it is regular.There is an interesting application of regularity to approximation of a measurable func-tion with one that is continuous.