226 CHAPTER 9. BASIC FUNCTION SPACES

Theorem 9.3.3 Let f ,g be measurable and nonnegative functions. Then

∫Ω

f gdµ ≤(∫

f pdµ

)1/p(∫Ω

gqdµ

)1/q

Proof: If either (∫

Ωf pdµ)1/p or (

∫Ω

gqdµ)1/q is 0, then there is nothing to show be-cause if (

∫Ω

f pdµ)1/p = 0, then∫

Ωf pdµ = 0 and you could let An ≡ {ω : f p (ω)≥ 1/n} .

Then0 =

∫Ω

f pdµ ≥∫

An

f pdµ ≥ (1/n)µ (An)

and so µ (An) = 0. Therefore, {ω : f (ω) ̸= 0}=∪∞n=1An and each of these sets in the union

has measure zero. It follows that {ω : f (ω) ̸= 0} has measure zero. Therefore,∫

Ωf gdµ =

0 and so indeed, there is nothing left to show. The situation is the same if (∫

Ωgqdµ)1/q = 0.

Thus assume both of the factors on the right in the inequality are nonzero. Then let A ≡(∫

Ωf pdµ)1/p ,B≡ (

∫Ω

gqdµ)1/q. Proposition 9.3.2,∫Ω

fA

gB

dµ ≤∫

f p

Ap pdµ +

∫Ω

gq

Bqqdµ

=1p

∫Ω

f pdµ

Ap +1q

∫Ω

gqdµ

Bq =1p+

1q= 1

Therefore,∫

Ωf gdµ ≤ AB = (

∫Ω

f pdµ)1/p (∫

Ωgqdµ)1/q ■

This makes it easy to prove the Minkowski inequality for the sum of two functions.

Theorem 9.3.4 Let f ,g be two measurable functions with values in F. Then(∫Ω

| f +g|p dµ

)1/p

≤(∫

| f |p dµ

)1/p

+

(∫Ω

|g|p dµ

)1/p

(9.6)

Proof: First of all,

| f +g|p = | f +g|p−1 | f +g| ≤ | f +g|p−1 (| f |+ |g|)

Recall that p−1 = p/q. Then, using Theorem 9.3.3,∫Ω

| f +g|p dµ ≤∫

| f +g|p/q | f |dµ +∫

| f +g|p/q |g|dµ

≤(∫

| f +g|p dµ

)1/q(∫| f |p dµ

)1/p

+

(∫Ω

| f +g|p dµ

)1/q(∫Ω

|g|p dµ

)1/p

=

(∫Ω

| f +g|p dµ

)1/q((∫

| f |p dµ

)1/p

+

(∫Ω

|g|p dµ

)1/p)

If∫

Ω| f +g|p dµ = 0, then 9.6 is obvious. If

∫Ω| f +g|p dµ = ∞, then

∞≤∫

2p−1 (| f |p + |g|p)dµ

226 CHAPTER 9. BASIC FUNCTION SPACESTheorem 9.3.3 Lez Ff, g be measurable and nonnegative functions. ThenJ fedus ( [ pray) ( [ du)Proof: If either (Jo fPdu)'/? or (Jogtdu)'4 is 0, then there is nothing to show be-cause if (Jof?du)'/? =0, then fo f?du =0 and you could let A, = {@: f?(@) >1/n}.Theno= [ frau > | sau > (1/n) H (An)and so 1l (A,) =0. Therefore, {@ : f (@) #0} =U*_,A, and each of these sets in the unionhas measure zero. It follows that {@ : f (@) #0} has measure zero. Therefore, fo fgdu =0 and so indeed, there is nothing left to show. The situation is the same if (o g7dU) '/4 9,Thus assume both of the factors on the right in the inequality are nonzero. Then let A =(Jo f?du)'” B= (fo ¢tdu)'/7. Proposition 9.3.2,‘P qQQAB AP p Q Big1 Pd 1 Id 1 1_ 1 Jof Hl Jos M_it_yp AP q Ba P 4qTherefore, Jo fgdu <AB = (Jo f?dp)'!” (Jagtdu)'/4 iThis makes it easy to prove the Minkowski inequality for the sum of two functions.Theorem 9.3.4 Ler S,g be two measurable functions with values in F. Then1/p 1/p 1/p( / Ir +al"as) < ( | du) +( | eau) (9.6)Q QO QProof: First of all,Ift+el?=|f+sl 'ift+al<lf+sl? | (fl +lel)Recall that p— 1 = p/q. Then, using Theorem 9.3.3,[irralaus [pret itiau+ f it+slielau(vm) (foe) "a vse) (Loe)(Lara) (fran) +( Lira)"If folf +g|? du =0, then 9.6 is obvious. If fo |f +g|?du =o, thenIAcos [2 "(is\+(el")au