328 CHAPTER 13. REPRESENTATION THEOREMS

Proof: Without loss of generality, assume µ (Ω) = ∞. By Proposition 7.11.1, either µ

is a finite measure or µ (Ω) =∞. These are the only two cases. Then let {Ωn} be a sequenceof disjoint elements of S having the property that 1 < µ(Ωn) < ∞, ∪∞

n=1Ωn = Ω. Definer(x) = ∑

∞n=1

1n2 XΩn(x) µ(Ωn)

−1, µ̃(E) =∫

E rdµ . Thus∫

Ωrdµ = µ̃(Ω) = ∑

∞n=1

1n2 < ∞ so

µ̃ is a finite measure. The above lemma gives the existence part of the conclusion of thetheorem. Uniqueness is done as before. ■

13.4 The Dual Space of L∞ (Ω)

What about the dual space of L∞ (Ω)? This will involve the following Lemma. Also recallthe notion of total variation defined in Definition 13.2.2.

Lemma 13.4.1 Let (Ω,F ) be a measure space. Denote by BV (Ω) the space of finitelyadditive complex measures ν such that |ν |(Ω)<∞. Then defining ∥ν∥≡ |ν |(Ω) , it followsthat BV (Ω) is a Banach space.

Proof: It is obvious that BV (Ω) is a vector space with the obvious conventions involv-ing scalar multiplication. Why is ∥·∥ a norm? All the axioms are obvious except for thetriangle inequality. However, this is not too hard either.

∥µ +ν∥ ≡ |µ +ν |(Ω) = supπ(Ω)

{∑

A∈π(Ω)

|µ (A)+ν (A)|}

≤ supπ(Ω)

{∑

A∈π(Ω)

|µ (A)|}+ sup

π(Ω)

{∑

A∈π(Ω)

|ν (A)|}

≡ |µ|(Ω)+ |ν |(Ω) = ∥ν∥+∥µ∥ .

Suppose now that {νn} is a Cauchy sequence. For each E ∈F ,

|νn (E)−νm (E)| ≤ ∥νn−νm∥

and so the sequence of complex numbers νn (E) converges. That to which it converges iscalled ν (E) . Then it is obvious that ν (E) is finitely additive. Why is |ν | finite? Since ∥·∥is a norm, it follows that there exists a constant C such that for all n, |νn|(Ω)<C. Let π (Ω)be any partition. Then

∑A∈π(Ω)

|ν (A)|= limn→∞

∑A∈π(Ω)

|νn (A)| ≤C.

Hence ν ∈ BV (Ω). Let ε > 0 be given and let N be such that if n,m > N, then ∥νn−νm∥<ε/2. Pick any such n. Then choose π (Ω) such that

|ν−νn|(Ω)− ε/2 < ∑A∈π(Ω)

|ν (A)−νn (A)|

= limm→∞

∑A∈π(Ω)

|νm (A)−νn (A)|< lim infm→∞|νn−νm|(Ω)≤ ε/2

It follows that limn→∞ ∥ν−νn∥= 0. ■

328 CHAPTER 13. REPRESENTATION THEOREMSProof: Without loss of generality, assume pt (Q) = ce. By Proposition 7.11.1, eitheris a finite measure or [LM (Q.) =o. These are the only two cases. Then let {Q,,} be a sequenceof disjoint elements of .¥ having the property that 1 < (Qn) < 0, UR_, Qy = Q. Definer(x) =D & Zo, (x) (Qn), A(E) = Jp rd. Thus fo rd = fl(Q) =F, <0 s0Ll is a finite measure. The above lemma gives the existence part of the conclusion of thetheorem. Uniqueness is done as before. Hi13.4 The Dual Space of L® (Q)What about the dual space of L® (Q)? This will involve the following Lemma. Also recallthe notion of total variation defined in Definition 13.2.2.Lemma 13.4.1 Let (Q,.7) be a measure space. Denote by BV (Q) the space of finitelyadditive complex measures Vv such that |v| (Q) < °°. Then defining ||v|| =|v| (Q), it followsthat BV (Q) is a Banach space.Proof: It is obvious that BV (Q) is a vector space with the obvious conventions involv-ing scalar multiplication. Why is ||-|| a norm? All the axioms are obvious except for thetriangle inequality. However, this is not too hard either.|e + v| 1-1) = wp | » mayevahm(Q) | Aen(Q)< wp | XY wa} au | » via}m(Q) \ Aex(Q) W(Q) \Aex(Q)= |H|(Q)+|v|(Q) =lv| + Ile.Suppose now that {v,} is a Cauchy sequence. For each E € ¥,IVn (E) — Vm (E)| < ||Vn — Vnand so the sequence of complex numbers v, (E) converges. That to which it converges iscalled v (E) . Then it is obvious that v (E) is finitely additive. Why is |v| finite? Since |]-||is anorm, it follows that there exists a constant C such that for all 1, |Vv,| (Q) <C. Let 2 (Q)be any partition. ThenY WviA)|=lim YP |v, (A) <c.AeEn(Q) Aen(Q)Hence v € BV (Q). Let € > 0 be given and let N be such that if n,m > N, then ||Vn — Vin|| <€/2. Pick any such n. Then choose 2 (Q) such thatlv —Vvn|(Q)—e/2< YI |v(A)— vn (A)|AEm(Q)=lim YO |¥m(A)—vn(A)| <lim inf |V_ —Vm|(Q) < €/2mm sen(Q) meeeIt follows that limy—;.. || V — V,|| = 0.