6 CHAPTER 1. SOME PREREQUISITE TOPICS

Proposition 1.3.4 Let z,w be complex numbers. Then the triangle inequality holds.

|z+w| ≤ |z|+ |w| , ||z|− |w|| ≤ |z−w| .

Proof: Let z = x+ iy and w = u+ iv. First note that

zw = (x+ iy)(u− iv) = xu+ yv+ i(yu− xv)

and so |xu+ yv| ≤ |zw|= |z| |w| .

|z+w|2 = (x+u+ i(y+ v))(x+u− i(y+ v))

= (x+u)2 +(y+ v)2 = x2 +u2 +2xu+2yv+ y2 + v2

≤ |z|2 + |w|2 +2 |z| |w|= (|z|+ |w|)2 ,

so this shows the first version of the triangle inequality. To get the second,

z = z−w+w, w = w− z+ z

and so by the first form of the inequality

|z| ≤ |z−w|+ |w| , |w| ≤ |z−w|+ |z|

and so both |z| − |w| and |w| − |z| are no larger than |z−w| and this proves the secondversion because ||z|− |w|| is one of |z|− |w| or |w|− |z|. ■

With this definition, it is important to note the following. Be sure to verify this. It is nottoo hard but you need to do it.

Remark 1.3.5 : Let z = a+ ib and w = c+ id. Then |z−w|=√(a− c)2 +(b−d)2. Thus

the distance between the point in the plane determined by the ordered pair (a,b) and theordered pair (c,d) equals |z−w| where z and w are as just described.

For example, consider the distance between (2,5) and (1,8) . From the distance formula

this distance equals√(2−1)2 +(5−8)2 =

√10. On the other hand, letting z = 2+ i5 and

w = 1+ i8, z−w = 1− i3 and so (z−w)(z−w) = (1− i3)(1+ i3) = 10 so |z−w|=√

10,the same thing obtained with the distance formula.

1.4 Polar Form Of Complex NumbersComplex numbers, are often written in the so called polar form which is described next.Suppose z = x+ iy is a complex number. Then

x+ iy =√

x2 + y2

(x√

x2 + y2+ i

y√x2 + y2

).

Now note that (x√

x2 + y2

)2

+

(y√

x2 + y2

)2

= 1

6 CHAPTER 1. SOME PREREQUISITE TOPICSProposition 1.3.4 Let z,w be complex numbers. Then the triangle inequality holds.Ik+wl S|el+lwl, Ile] — [wi] <|e—-w]-Proof: Let z= x-+iy and w = u-+ iv. First note thatzw = (x+iy) (u—iv) =xu+yv+i(yu—xv)and so |xu + yv| < |zw| = |z||w].le tw)? = (xtuti(yty)) (@tu-ily+y))=(xtu)+(yt+v? =e +0 +2xu+2yv+y?+V?2 2 2Sel + fw) +2 [e\ fw] = (z| + I)",so this shows the first version of the triangle inequality. To get the second,Z=Z-wtw,w=w-Z+2Zand so by the first form of the inequalityIz] < |z—w|+|w], [wl < le—w] + Igand so both |z|—|w| and |w| —|z| are no larger than |z—w]| and this proves the secondversion because ||z| — |w|| is one of |z| — |w| or |w| —|z|.With this definition, it is important to note the following. Be sure to verify this. It is nottoo hard but you need to do it.Remark 1.3.5 ; Let z= a+ ib and w=c+id. Then |z—w| = (a —c)? +(b—d)*. Thusthe distance between the point in the plane determined by the ordered pair (a,b) and theordered pair (c,d) equals |z—w| where z and w are as just described.For example, consider the distance between (2,5) and (1,8). From the distance formulathis distance equals Ve — 1)’ +(5—8)* = V0. On the other hand, letting z = 2+ i5 andw=14+i8,z—w=1-i3 and so (z—w) (zw) = (1-13) (1 +13) = 10 so |z—w| = V10,the same thing obtained with the distance formula.1.4 Polar Form Of Complex NumbersComplex numbers, are often written in the so called polar form which is described next.Suppose z = x +iy is a complex number. ThenXxtiv VEE + » )Vere VeryNow note that(Giis) °C) -