18.6. THE MATRIX EXPONENTIAL, DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS ∗ 451

By analogy with the situation in calculus, consider the infinite sum

∑k=0

Aktk

k!≡ lim

n→∞

n

∑k=0

Aktk

k!

where here A is a p× p matrix having real or complex entries. Then letting m< n, it followsfrom the above lemma that∥∥∥∥∥ n

∑k=0

Aktk

k!−

m

∑k=0

Aktk

k!

∥∥∥∥∥∞

=

∥∥∥∥∥ n

∑k=m+1

Aktk

k!

∥∥∥∥∥∞

≤n

∑k=m+1

|t|k

k!

∥∥∥Ak∥∥∥

≤∞

∑k=m

|t|k

k!

∥∥∥Ak∥∥∥

≤∞

∑k=m

|t|k pk ∥A∥k∞

k!

Now the series ∑∞k=0

|t|k pk∥A∥k∞k! converges and in fact equals exp(|t| p∥A∥

∞). It follows from

calculus that

limm→∞

∑k=m

|t|k pk ∥A∥k∞

k!= 0.

It follows that the i jth entry of the partial sum ∑nk=0

Aktk

k! is a Cauchy sequence and henceby completeness of C or R it converges. Therefore, the above limit exists. This is stated asthe essential part of the following theorem.

Theorem 18.6.4 Let t ∈ [a,b]⊆ R where b−a < ∞. Then for each t ∈ [a,b] ,

limn→∞

n

∑k=0

Aktk

k!≡

∑k=0

Aktk

k!≡Φ(t) , A0 ≡ I,

exists. Furthermore, there exists a single constant C such that for tk ∈ [a,b] , the infinitesum

∑k=0

Aktkk

k!

converges and in fact ∥∥∥∥∥ ∞

∑k=0

Aktkk

k!

∥∥∥∥∥∞

≤C

Proof: The convergence for ∑∞k=0

Aktk

k! was just established.Consider the estimate. From the above lemma,∥∥∥∥∥ n

∑k=0

Aktkk

k!

∥∥∥∥∥∞

≤n

∑k=0

pk (|a|+ |b|)k ∥A∥k∞

k!

≤∞

∑k=0

pk (|a|+ |b|)k ∥A∥k∞

k!

= exp(p(|a|+ |b|)∥A∥∞)

It follows that the i jth entry of ∑nk=0

Aktkk

k! has magnitude no larger than the right side of theabove inequality. Also, a repeat of the above argument after Lemma 18.6.3 shows that the

18.6. THE MATRIX EXPONENTIAL, DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS * 451By analogy with the situation in calculus, consider the infinite sumoo Aktk n Aktkim ) —! oo !k! neo I=) Kk!where here A is a p X p matrix having real or complex entries. Then letting m <n, it followsfrom the above lemma thatn Aktk m Aktk n Aktk n tkm kl ~ L a | = Lk a r lA‘.k=0 “* k=0 If, k=m+1 ™* |[. 0 k=myl | k ita< EM al <i tea»kk kNow the series 29 Wp le converges and in fact equals exp (|t| p ||All...). It follows fromcalculus that keyl Pelle. Palle _It follows that the ij’” entry of the partial sum Yee ott is a Cauchy sequence and henceby completeness of C or R it converges. Therefore, the ‘above limit exists. This is stated asthe essential part of the following theorem.Theorem 18.6.4 Lett € [a,b] CR where b—a < ©. Then for each t € [a,b],n av = po AMEk=0exists. Furthermore, there exists a single constant C such that for ty € [a,b], the infinitesum co Akyhokfoo Kk!converges and in factyakk!k=0<Ccokk . .Proof: The convergence for D¢_9 “;- was just established.Consider the estimate. From the above lemma,n Altye (al oly Alle.k!k=0co7 (Ja| + ley Alle.lAxp (p Gals DplalkakIt follows that the ij’” entry of Yeo at has magnitude no larger than the right side of theabove inequality. Also, a repeat of the above argument after Lemma 18.6.3 shows that the