22.1. DIVERGENCE AND CURL OF A VECTOR FIELD 401

5. ∇× (f ×g) = (∇ ·g)f− (∇ ·f)g+ (g·∇)f− (f ·∇)g

Proof: These are all easy to establish if you use the repeated index summation conven-tion and the reduction identities.

∇ · (∇×f) = ∂i (∇×f)i = ∂i(ε i jk∂ j fk

)= ε i jk∂i (∂ j fk)

= ε jik∂ j (∂i fk) =−ε i jk∂ j (∂i fk) =−ε i jk∂i (∂ j fk)

= −∇ · (∇×f) .

This establishes the first formula. The second formula is done similarly. Now consider thethird.

(∇× (∇×f))i = ε i jk∂ j (∇×f)k = ε i jk∂ j (εkrs∂r fs)

=

=ε i jk︷︸︸︷εki j εkrs∂ j (∂r fs) = (δ irδ js−δ isδ jr)∂ j (∂r fs)

= ∂ j (∂i f j)−∂ j (∂ j fi) = ∂i (∂ j f j)−∂ j (∂ j fi)

=(

∇(∇ ·f)−∇2f)

i

This establishes the third identity.Consider the fourth identity.

∇ · (f ×g) = ∂i (f ×g)i = ∂iε i jk f jgk

= ε i jk (∂i f j)gk + ε i jk f j (∂igk)

=(εki j∂i f j

)gk−

(ε jik∂igk

)fk

= ∇×f ·g−∇×g ·f.

This proves the fourth identity.Consider the fifth.

(∇× (f ×g))i = ε i jk∂ j (f ×g)k = ε i jk∂ jεkrs frgs

= εki jεkrs∂ j ( frgs) = (δ irδ js−δ isδ jr)∂ j ( frgs)

= ∂ j ( fig j)−∂ j ( f jgi)

= (∂ jg j) fi +g j∂ j fi− (∂ j f j)gi− f j (∂ jgi)

= ((∇ ·g)f +(g ·∇)(f)− (∇ ·f)g− (f ·∇)(g))i

and this establishes the fifth identity. ■

22.1.2 Vector PotentialsOne of the above identities says ∇ ·(∇×f) = 0. Suppose now ∇ ·g= 0. Does it follow thatthere exists f such that g = ∇×f ? It turns out that this is usually the case and when suchan f exists, it is called a vector potential. Here is one way to do it, assuming everythingis defined so the following formulas make sense.

f (x,y,z)=(∫ z

0g2 (x,y, t) dt,−

∫ z

0g1 (x,y, t) dt +

∫ x

0g3 (t,y,0) dt,0

)T

. (22.1)

22.1. DIVERGENCE AND CURL OF A VECTOR FIELD 4015. Vx(fxg)=(V-g)f-(V-f)gt+(a-V) f-(f-VY)gProof: These are all easy to establish if you use the repeated index summation conven-tion and the reduction identities.O(V x f); = 9; (€:jn0j fe) = €ije% (Oj fe)E jikOj (Oife) = —€: jn; (Ait) = —Eijn0: (Oj fx)-V-(Vxf).V-(Vx f)This establishes the first formula. The second formula is done similarly. Now consider thethird.(Vx (Vx f)); = €ijeOi (VX fy = €:ijnO;j (ExrsOrfs)= Far €ys0) (0;fs) = (646 js _ 6555 jr) 0j (0,fs)= 0; (0:fj) — Oj (Oj fi) = 0 (O;fj) — 2; (Afi)= (vv. f)-VvFf)UThis establishes the third identity.Consider the fourth identity.Vif xg) = AF Xg); = %iK Sige= ijk (fj) B+ Eijc fj (Oise)(xij Afi) Sk — (€jikASK) fe= Vxf-g—-Vxg-f.This proves the fourth identity.Consider the fifth.(Vx(fF xg); = Eiji (FX G)p = EijeOjEkrs fr8sEni jEkrsOj (fr8s) = (did js _ dis jr) 0; (f,8s)0; (fig) — 0; F8i)(0)8;) fit 80 fi — (OiF;) 81 — Fj (Aj81)= ((V-g)ft+@a-V)(f)-V-f)g—-(Ff-V)(9));and this establishes the fifth identity.22.1.2 Vector PotentialsOne of the above identities says V-(V x f) =0. Suppose now V-g = 0. Does it follow thatthere exists f such that g = V x f ? It turns out that this is usually the case and when suchan f exists, it is called a vector potential. Here is one way to do it, assuming everythingis defined so the following formulas make sense.Z Z x TFluna)=(f 82 (x, y,t) ar, | 81 (X,y,1) a+ | 83 (t,y,0) a0) ; (22.1)