11.4. POSITIVE MATRICES 295

ort Imy ̸= x0 for all t ∈ R.

Assume the first holds. Then varying t ∈R, there exists a value of t such that x0+t Rey>0but it is not the case that x0 + t Rey >> 0. Then A(x0 + t Rey) >> 0 by Lemma 11.4.2.But this implies λ 0 (x0 + t Rey)>> 0 which is a contradiction. Hence there exist real num-bers, α1 and α2 such that Rey = α1x0 and Imy = α2x0 showing that y = (α1 + iα2)x0.This proves 3.

It is possible to obtain a simple corollary to the above theorem.

Corollary 11.4.5 If A > 0 and Am >> 0 for some m ∈ N, then all the conclusions of theabove theorem hold.

Proof: There exists µ0 > 0 such that Amy0 = µ0y0 for y0 >> 0 by Theorem 11.4.4and

µ0 = sup{µ : Amx≥ µx for some x ∈ K} .

Let λm0 = µ0. Then

(A−λ 0I)(

Am−1 +λ 0Am−2 + · · ·+λm−10 I

)y0 = (Am−λ

m0 I)y0 = 0

and so letting x0 ≡(

Am−1 +λ 0Am−2 + · · ·+λm−10 I

)y0, it follows x0 >> 0 and Ax0 =

λ 0x0.Suppose now that Ax = µx for x ̸= 0 and µ ̸= λ 0. Suppose |µ| ≥ λ 0. Multiplying

both sides by A, it follows Amx= µmx and |µm|= |µ|m ≥ λm0 = µ0 and so from Theorem

11.4.4, since |µm| ≥ µ0, and µm is an eigenvalue of Am, it follows that µm = µ0. But byTheorem 11.4.4 again, this implies x= cy0 for some scalar, c and hence Ay0 = µy0. Sincey0 >> 0, it follows µ ≥ 0 and so µ = λ 0, a contradiction. Therefore, |µ|< λ 0.

Finally, if Ax = λ 0x, then Amx = λm0 x and so x = cy0 for some scalar, c. Conse-

quently,(Am−1 +λ 0Am−2 + · · ·+λ

m−10 I

)x = c

(Am−1 +λ 0Am−2 + · · ·+λ

m−10 I

)y0

= cx0.

Hencemλ

m−10 x= cx0

which shows the dimension of the eigenspace for λ 0 is one. ■The following corollary is an extremely interesting convergence result involving the

powers of positive matrices.

Corollary 11.4.6 Let A > 0 and Am >> 0 for some m∈N. Then for λ 0 given in 11.5, thereexists a rank one matrix P such that limm→∞

∣∣∣∣∣∣( Aλ 0

)m−P∣∣∣∣∣∣= 0.

Proof: Considering AT , and the fact that A and AT have the same eigenvalues, Corollary11.4.5 implies the existence of a vector, v >> 0 such that

ATv = λ 0v.

11.4. POSITIVE MATRICES 295ortImy # x for allt ER.Assume the first holds. Then varying ¢ € R, there exists a value of t such that ap +tRey > 0but it is not the case that ap +tRey >> 0. Then A (ap +tRey) >> 0 by Lemma 11.4.2.But this implies Ao (ao +¢Rey) >> 0 which is a contradiction. Hence there exist real num-bers, @ and @ such that Rey = a9 and Imy = (2% showing that y = (@| +iQ2) xo.This proves 3.It is possible to obtain a simple corollary to the above theorem.Corollary 11.4.5 [fA > 0 and A” >> 0 for some m €N, then all the conclusions of theabove theorem hold.Proof: There exists [19 > 0 such that A” yo = Up Yo for yo >> 0 by Theorem 11.4.4andHo = sup{u: A” a > ux for some x € K}.Let AG) = Ho. Then(A—Apl) (am + AoA™ 242-4 Ag 11) Yo =(A"—Agl) yo = 0and so letting a = (an + AA"? +... +g '1) Yo, it follows ao >> 0 and Aap =Axo.Suppose now that Av = pax for 40 and u ¥ Ao. Suppose |u| > Ao. Multiplyingboth sides by A, it follows A” av = wax and |u| = |u|" > Ao = Uo and so from Theorem11.4.4, since |u| > Mo, and uw” is an eigenvalue of A”, it follows that uw” = Up. But byTheorem 11.4.4 again, this implies « = cyg for some scalar, c and hence Ayp = UY. SinceYo >> 0, it follows u > 0 and so U = Ao, a contradiction. Therefore, |u| < Ao.Finally, if Aw = Agaw, then Aa” = AO@ and so & = cyp for some scalar, c. Conse-quently,(am $AgA™ 7? 4. +g" '1) ax c (am + AgA™ > 4.5. +i '1) YoCLO.Hence-1may ££ =cxowhich shows the dimension of the eigenspace for Ao is one. HiThe following corollary is an extremely interesting convergence result involving thepowers of positive matrices.Corollary 11.4.6 Let A >0 and A" >> 0 for some m € N. Then for Ao given in 11.5, there(5) -F||=0Xo = 0.Proof: Considering A’, and the fact that A and A” have the same eigenvalues, Corollary11.4.5 implies the existence of a vector, v >> 0 such thatexists a rank one matrix P such that lim.Al v=Aov.