204 CHAPTER 7. VECTOR SPACES AND FIELDS

Example 7.3.24 The polynomial x2 + 1 is irreducible in R [x] , polynomials having realcoefficients. To see this is the case, suppose ψ (x) divides x2 + 1. Then

x2 + 1 = ψ (x) q (x)

If the degree of ψ (x) is less than 2, then it must be either a constant or of the form ax+ b.In the latter case, −b/a must be a zero of the right side, hence of the left but x2 + 1 has noreal zeros. Therefore, the degree of ψ (x) must be two and q (x) must be a constant. Thusthe only polynomial which divides x2 + 1 are constants and multiples of x2 + 1. Therefore,this shows x2 +1 is irreducible. Find the inverse of

[x2 + x+ 1

]in the space of equivalence

classes, R/(x2 + 1

).

You can solve this with partial fractions.

1

(x2 + 1) (x2 + x+ 1)= − x

x2 + 1+

x+ 1

x2 + x+ 1

and so1 = (−x)

(x2 + x+ 1

)+ (x+ 1)

(x2 + 1

)which implies

1 ∼ (−x)(x2 + x+ 1

)and so the inverse is [−x] .

The following proposition is interesting. It was essentially proved above but to emphasizeit, here it is again.

Proposition 7.3.25 Suppose p (x) ∈ F [x] is irreducible and has degree n. Then everyelement of G = F [x] / (p (x)) is of the form [0] or [r (x)] where the degree of r (x) is lessthan n.

Proof: This follows right away from the Euclidean algorithm for polynomials. If k (x)has degree larger than n− 1, then

k (x) = q (x) p (x) + r (x)

where r (x) is either equal to 0 or has degree less than n. Hence

[k (x)] = [r (x)] . ■

Example 7.3.26 In the situation of the above example, find [ax+ b]−1

assuming a2+ b2 ̸=0. Note this includes all cases of interest thanks to the above proposition.

You can do it with partial fractions as above.

1

(x2 + 1) (ax+ b)=

b− ax

(a2 + b2) (x2 + 1)+

a2

(a2 + b2) (ax+ b)

and so

1 =1

a2 + b2(b− ax) (ax+ b) +

a2

(a2 + b2)

(x2 + 1

)Thus

1

a2 + b2(b− ax) (ax+ b) ∼ 1

and so

[ax+ b]−1

=[(b− ax)]

a2 + b2=b− a [x]

a2 + b2

You might find it interesting to recall that (ai+ b)−1

= b−aia2+b2 .

204 CHAPTER 7. VECTOR SPACES AND FIELDSExample 7.3.24 The polynomial x? +1 is irreducible in R[x], polynomials having realcoefficients. To see this is the case, suppose w(x) divides x? +1. Thena? +1=(x)q(z)If the degree of (a) is less than 2, then it must be either a constant or of the form ax + b.In the latter case, —b/a must be a zero of the right side, hence of the left but x2 +1 has noreal zeros. Therefore, the degree of w(x) must be two and q(x) must be a constant. Thusthe only polynomial which divides x? +1 are constants and multiples of x? +1. Therefore,this shows x? +1 is irreducible. Find the inverse of [2 +at+ 1] in the space of equivalenceclasses, R/ (x? +1).You can solve this with partial fractions.1 x a+(a? +1) (@? +241) Pel! eter]and so1 = (—a) (2? +241) + (a@+1) (a? +1)which implies1 ~ (=a) (2? +241)and so the inverse is [—2] .The following proposition is interesting. It was essentially proved above but to emphasizeit, here it is again.Proposition 7.3.25 Suppose p(x) € F [a] is irreducible and has degree n. Then everyelement of G = F [a] /(p(a)) is of the form [0] or [r (x)] where the degree of r(a) is lessthan n.Proof: This follows right away from the Euclidean algorithm for polynomials. If k ()has degree larger than n — 1, thenk (a) = (@)p (2) +1 (x)where r (x) is either equal to 0 or has degree less than n. Hence[k (x)] = [r(2)].Example 7.3.26 In the situation of the above example, find jax + bt assuming a? +b?0. Note this includes all cases of interest thanks to the above proposition.You can do it with partial fractions as above.1 b-—ax a?(a2? +1)(av+b) (a? +0?) (a? +1) + (a? + b?) (ax + b)and so1=—+ 6 — ae) (av +b) + — (0? +1)= 2PaP ax) (ax (a2 +B) xThus 1and sofax +0)! _ [((b—aa)] b—a[z]az + b2 ~ @2+ 82You might find it interesting to recall that (ai + 6)~' = aa