330 CHAPTER 13. NORMS

Actually, this is nothing new. It turns out that ||·||2 is nothing more than the operatornorm for A taken with respect to the usual Euclidean norm,

|x| =

(n∑

k=1

|xk|2)1/2

.

Proposition 13.0.13 The following holds.

||A||2 = sup {|Ax| : |x| = 1} ≡ ||A|| .

Proof: Note that A∗A is Hermitian and so by Corollary 12.3.4,

||A||2 = max{(A∗Ax,x)

1/2: |x| = 1

}= max

{(Ax,Ax)

1/2: |x| = 1

}= max {|Ax| : |x| = 1} = ||A|| . ■

Here is another proof of this proposition. Recall there are unitary matrices of the right

size U, V such that A = U

(σ 0

0 0

)V ∗ where the matrix on the inside is as described

in the section on the singular value decomposition. Then since unitary matrices preservenorms,

||A|| = sup|x|≤1

∣∣∣∣∣U(σ 0

0 0

)V ∗x

∣∣∣∣∣ = sup|V ∗x|≤1

∣∣∣∣∣U(σ 0

0 0

)V ∗x

∣∣∣∣∣= sup

|y|≤1

∣∣∣∣∣U(σ 0

0 0

)y

∣∣∣∣∣ = sup|y|≤1

∣∣∣∣∣(σ 0

0 0

)y

∣∣∣∣∣ = σ1 ≡ ||A||2

This completes the alternate proof.From now on, ||A||2 will mean either the operator norm of A taken with respect to the

usual Euclidean norm or the largest singular value of A, whichever is most convenient.An interesting application of the notion of equivalent norms on Rn is the process of

giving a norm on a finite Cartesian product of normed linear spaces.

Definition 13.0.14 Let Xi, i = 1, · · · , n be normed linear spaces with norms, ||·||i . For

x ≡ (x1, · · · , xn) ∈n∏

i=1

Xi

define θ :∏n

i=1Xi → Rn by

θ (x) ≡ (||x1||1 , · · · , ||xn||n)

Then if ||·|| is any norm on Rn, define a norm on∏n

i=1Xi, also denoted by ||·|| by

||x|| ≡ ||θx|| .

The following theorem follows immediately from Corollary 13.0.8.

Theorem 13.0.15 Let Xi and ||·||i be given in the above definition and consider the normson∏n

i=1Xi described there in terms of norms on Rn. Then any two of these norms on∏ni=1Xi obtained in this way are equivalent.

330 CHAPTER 13. NORMSActually, this is nothing new. It turns out that ||-||, is nothing more than the operatornorm for A taken with respect to the usual Euclidean norm,n 1/2x| = (do?) ,k=1Proposition 13.0.13 The following holds.|| Ally = sup {|Ax] : |x] = 1} = |[Al].Proof: Note that A*A is Hermitian and so by Corollary 12.3.4,|All = max {(A* Ax, x)'/? : |x| = i} = max { (Ax,Ax)"/? |x| = i}= max {|Ax|:|x|=1}=||A||.Here is another proof of this proposition. Recall there are unitary matrices of the righta 0size U,V such that A = U 0 0 V* where the matrix on the inside is as describedin the section on the singular value decomposition. Then since unitary matrices preservenorms,u( 7 ° \yx u( 7 © \v*x0 0 0 0||A|| = sup = sup|x|<1 |V*x|<1a 0 a 0= sup |U y| = sup yl =o, =||AIyi<1 (; ,) Iyi<1 (; ,) r= ll4lhThis completes the alternate proof.From now on, ||A||, will mean either the operator norm of A taken with respect to theusual Euclidean norm or the largest singular value of A, whichever is most convenient.An interesting application of the notion of equivalent norms on R” is the process ofgiving a norm on a finite Cartesian product of normed linear spaces.Definition 13.0.14 Let X;,i=1,--- ,n be normed linear spaces with norms, ||-||,;. FornX = (X1,°-+ Ln) e][xi=1define 0 : []_, X; > R” byA(x) = (leallr ss [2n|ln)Then if ||-|| is any norm on R", define a norm on [[;_, Xi, also denoted by ||-|| by||| = ||@x!|.The following theorem follows immediately from Corollary 13.0.8.Theorem 13.0.15 Let X; and ||-||; be given in the above definition and consider the normson |][;_, X; described there in terms of norms on R". Then any two of these norms onIE, X; obtained in this way are equivalent.