1018 CHAPTER 29. THE AREA FORMULA

29.5 The Area FormulaAt this point, I will begin assuming h is Lipschitz continuous to avoid the fuss with whethersets are appropriately measurable and to ensure that the measure considered below is ab-solutely continuous without any heroics. Let h be Lipschitz continuous on G, an openset containing A, the set where h is differentiable. Suppose also that h is one to one onA. Then H n (h(G\A)) = 0 because mn (G\A) = 0 by Rademacher’s theorem. HenceLemma 29.1.2 applies.

Lemma 29.5.1 Let h be Lipschitz. Let h be one to one and differentiable on A withmn (G\A) = 0. If N ⊆ G has measure zero, then h(N) has H n measure zero and ifE is Lebesgue measurable subset of G, then h(E) is H n measurable subset of Rm. Ifν (E)≡H n (h(E)) , then ν ≪ mn.

Proof: Lemma 29.1.2 implies h(N) = 0 if mn (N) = 0.Also from this lemma, h(E) isH n measurable if E is. Is ν a measure? Suppose {Ei} are disjoint Lebesgue measurablesubsets of G. Then for A the set where Dh exists as above,

ν (∪iEi) ≡ H n (h(∪iEi))≤H n (h(∪iEi∩A)∪h(G\A))

≤ ∑i

H n (h(Ei∩A))+H n (h(G\A)) = ∑i

H n (h(Ei∩A)) = ∑i

ν (Ei)

Thus ν ≪ mn.It follows from the Radon Nikodym theorem for Radon measures, that

ν (E)≡H n (h(E)) =∫

EDmnνdmn

but Dmnν ≡ limr→0H n(h(B(x,r)))

mn(x,r) = limr→0H n(h(B(x,r))∩A)

mn(x,r) = J∗ (x) for a.e. x from Theorem29.4.3. Also, ν is finite on closed balls so it is regular thanks to Corollary 11.6.8. Thisshows from the Radon Nikodym theorem, Theorem 31.3.5 that∫

Xh(E)dH n =∫

EDmnνdmn =

∫XE (x)J∗dmn

Note also that, since AC has measure zero,∫h(A)

Xh(E)dH n =∫

AXE (x)J∗dmn

Now let F be a Borel set in Rm. Recall this implies F is H n measurable. Then∫h(A)

XF (y)dH n =∫

XF∩h(A) (y)dH n = H n (h(h−1 (F)∩A))

= ν(h−1 (F)

)=∫

XA∩h−1(F) (x)J∗ (x)dmn

=∫

AXF (h(x))J∗ (x)dmn. (29.5.22)

1018 CHAPTER 29. THE AREA FORMULA29.5 The Area FormulaAt this point, I will begin assuming h is Lipschitz continuous to avoid the fuss with whethersets are appropriately measurable and to ensure that the measure considered below is ab-solutely continuous without any heroics. Let h be Lipschitz continuous on G, an openset containing A, the set where h is differentiable. Suppose also that h is one to one onA. Then #" (h(G\A)) = 0 because m,(G\A) = 0 by Rademacher’s theorem. HenceLemma 29.1.2 applies.Lemma 29.5.1 Let h be Lipschitz. Let h be one to one and differentiable on A withmy, (G\A) =0. If N C G has measure zero, then h(N) has #¢" measure zero and ifE is Lebesgue measurable subset of G, then h(E) is 2" measurable subset of R'". IfV(E)= 4" (h(E)), thenv <mp.Proof: Lemma 29.1.2 implies h(N) = 0 if m, (N) = 0.Also from this lemma, h(£) is4" measurable if E is. Is v a measure? Suppose {£;} are disjoint Lebesgue measurablesubsets of G. Then for A the set where Dh exists as above,Vv (UiE;) FO" (h(UjEi)) S70" (h(UjE;NA) Uh(G \A))< Leh (E;MA)) +." (h(G\A)) = Leth (E;NA)) = ¥v (Ej)iThusv<m,. iIt follows from the Radon Nikodym theorem for Radon measures, thatV(E) = #" (h( )) = [Dn,vamybut Dn, V = lim,—0 aes = lim,—s9 ota A = J, (x) for a.e. x from Theorem29.4.3. Also, v is finite on closed balls so it is regular thanks to Corollary 11.6.8. Thisshows from the Radon Nikodym theorem, Theorem 31.3.5 that/ By (pd HO = | Dn, VdMn = / Rr (x) JdmyENote also that, since AC has measure zero,J Fede" = | Bie (x) Jd,h(A) ANow let F be a Borel set in R”. Recall this implies F is #7” measurable. Theniy MDH = | Promay (9) de" = 26" (h (WF) A)= v(t! (P)) = [ Pigomicey (8) Js (8) drm- | 2p (n(x) Je (X) dtp. (29.5.2)