1028 CHAPTER 29. THE AREA FORMULA

+∫

Ai

∫ gi(x1,··· ,xp−1)

−∞

Dp (ψ i f (x1, · · · ,xp−1,xp))wpdxpdx1 · · ·dxp−1

Doing the integrals using the observation that gi, j (x1, · · · ,xp−1) does not depend on xp, thisreduces further to∫

Ai

(ψ i f )(x1, · · · ,xp−1,xp)Ni (x1, · · · ,xp−1,gi (x1, · · · ,xp−1)) ·wdmp−1 (29.7.33)

where Ni (x1, · · · ,xp−1,gi (x1, · · · ,xp−1)) is given by

(−gi,1 (x1, · · · ,xp−1) ,−gi,2 (x1, · · · ,xp−1) , · · · ,−gi,p−1 (x1, · · · ,xp−1) ,1) . (29.7.34)

At this point I need a technical lemma which will allow the use of the area formula. Thepart of the boundary of U which is contained in Qi is the image of the map, hi (x1, · · · ,xp−1)given by (x1, · · · ,xp−1,gi (x1, · · · ,xp−1)) for (x1, · · · ,xp−1) ∈ Ai. I need a formula for

det(Dhi (x1, · · · ,xp−1)

∗Dhi (x1, · · · ,xp−1))1/2

.

To avoid interupting the argument, I will state the lemma here and prove it later.

Lemma 29.7.9

det(Dhi (x1, · · · ,xp−1)

∗Dhi (x1, · · · ,xp−1))1/2

=

√√√√1+p−1

∑j−1

gi, j (x1, · · · ,xp−1)2 ≡ J∗i (x1, · · · ,xp−1) .

Fory = (x1, · · · ,xp−1,gi (x1, · · · ,xp−1)) ∈ ∂U ∩Qi

and n defined by

ni (y) =1

J∗i (x1, · · · ,xp−1)Ni (y)

it follows from the description of J∗i (x1, · · · ,xp−1) given in the above lemma, that ni is aunit vector. All components of ni are continuous functions of limits of continuous func-tions. Therefore, ni is Borel measurable and so it is H p−1 measurable. Now 29.7.33reduces to ∫

Ai

(ψ i f )(x1, · · · ,xp−1,gi (x1, · · · ,xp−1))×

ni (x1, · · · ,xp−1,gi (x1, · · · ,xp−1)) ·wJ∗i (x1, · · · ,xp−1)dmp−1.

By the area formula this equals∫h(Ai)

ψ i f (y)ni (y) ·wdH p−1.

1028 CHAPTER 29. THE AREA FORMULA8i(X1 0 Xp-1)+[/ Dp (Wif (15° Xp-1,Xp)) Wpdxpdxy ++ dxp—1Doing the integrals using the observation that gj; (x1,--- ,X»—1) does not depend on xp, thisreduces further to| (Wf) (%15°°* -Xp—1.Xp) Ni (155+ Xp—158i (X1,°°* -Xp—1)) -wdmp_1 (29.7.33)where Nj (x1,°-+ ,Xp—1,8i (%1,-+: ,Xp—1)) is given by(—8i,1 (%15°+* Xp—1) 81,2 (X15 °° Xp) °° ~Bip—1 (X15°+* Xp-1), 1). (29.7.34)At this point I need a technical lemma which will allow the use of the area formula. Thepart of the boundary of U which is contained in Q; is the image of the map, h; (x1,--- Xp-1)given by (x1,-+ ,Xp—1,8i (X1,°+* ,Xp—1)) for (x1,-++ ,xp—1) € Aj. I need a formula forx 1/2det (Dhj (x1,-++ .Xp—1) Dh (x1,-++ ,Xp—1)) / .To avoid interupting the argument, I will state the lemma here and prove it later.Lemma 29.7.9det (Dh; (x1,°+* .Xp—1)* Dhy (x1,-+- Xp-1))?p-!= ,{I+ Ds tts Apa Soi xp).jaForY = (1577+ Xp-1,8i (%1,°++ -Xp-1)) € PUN;and n defined by ;nj(y) = Taluka) aN)it follows from the description of J,;(x1,--- ,Xp—1) given in the above lemma, that nj; is aunit vector. All components of n; are continuous functions of limits of continuous func-tions. Therefore, n; is Borel measurable and so it is #?~! measurable. Now 29.7.33reduces to| (Wf) (X1,°°* -Xp—1,8i (X1,°+* .Xp-1)) Xnj (x1,0°° >Xp—158i (x1,°°° Xp-1)) Ws (x1,°° ,Xp-1)dmp_1.By the area formula this equals[vit y)mi(y) war,Jn(A;)