1240 CHAPTER 35. WEAK DERIVATIVES

= C∫

Sn−1

∫ r

0

|∇u(x+ tw)|tn−1 tn−1dtdσ

= C∫

U0

|∇u(x+ z)||z|n−1 dz

≤ C(∫

U0

|∇u(x+ z)|p dz)1/p(∫

U|z|p

′−np′)1/p′

= C(∫

U|∇u(z)|p dz

)1/p(∫Sn−1

∫ r

p′−np′ρ

n−1dρdσ

)(p−1)/p

= C(∫

U|∇u(z)|p dz

)1/p(∫

Sn−1

∫ r

0

1

ρn−1p−1

dρdσ

)(p−1)/p

= C(

p−1p−n

)(p−1)/p(∫U|∇u(z)|p dz

)1/p

r1− np

= C(

p−1p−n

)(p−1)/p(∫U|∇u(z)|p dz

)1/p

|x−y|1−np

Similarly,∫−

V|u(y)−u(z)|dz≤C

(p−1p−n

)(p−1)/p(∫V|∇u(z)|p dz

)1/p

|x−y|1−np

Therefore,

|u(x)−u(y)| ≤C(

p−1p−n

)(p−1)/p(∫B(x,2|x−y|)

|∇u(z)|p dz)1/p

|x−y|1−np

because B(x,2 |x−y|)⊇V ∪U. This proves the lemma.The following corollary is also interesting

Corollary 35.4.2 Suppose u ∈C1 (Rn) . Then

|u(y)−u(x)−∇u(x) · (y−x)|

≤C(

1m(B(x,2 |x−y|))

∫B(x,2|x−y|)

|∇u(z)−∇u(x) |pdz)1/p

| x− y|. (35.4.2)

Proof: This follows easily from letting g(y) ≡ u(y)− u(x)−∇u(x) ·(y−x) . Theng ∈C1 (Rn), g(x) = 0, and ∇g(z) = ∇u(z)−∇u(x) . From Lemma 35.4.1,

|u(y)−u(x)−∇u(x) · (y−x)|= |g(y)|= |g(y)−g(x)|

≤ C(∫

B(x,2|x−y|)|∇u(z)−∇u(x) |pdz

)1/p

|x−y|1−np

= C(

1m(B(x,2 |x−y|))

∫B(x,2|x−y|)

|∇u(z)−∇u(x) |pdz)1/p

| x− y|.

1240Similarly,IACHAPTER 35.c/ [ |\Vu(x+tw)| "-latdegn-l gn|\Vu(x+z)|n—-1dzUo |z|C (/. Vu (x-+2)|"z) "” (/, i") veCCc(Le(js—1y-¢{TnyyWEAK DERIVATIVES\/p roy, (p-1)/pu \!'az) (/ [ pe" p""apdc)srl JO1/p rq (p—1)/pu ("dz | [ — dpdosrl JO pr!1)/p 1/p on[vue "az rPn(- «(E1)" (pon)(=(p—1)/p 1/p ;fluo) ~u(7)|dz<c (7 *) (/ IVu(n|" dz) Ix—y|!-?VTherefore,p-1 (p-1)/p 1/p inwexy-uonisc(2—) (Cf iwutaiPac) x-ylp-n B(x.2x-y\)because B (x,2|x—y|) > VUU. This proves the lemma.The following corollary is also interestingCorollary 35.4.2 Suppose u € C! (R"). Then|u(y) — u(x) — Vu (x) -(y—x)|1 . > 1/pVu(z)—V — yl. 42<€ (seRIRC Trvox-vy| (2) — Wu (x)| i) Ix— yl O42)Proof: This follows easily from letting g(y) = u(y) — u(x)geC'(R"),gIA— Vu(x)-(y—x). Then(x) =0, and Vg (z) = Vu(z) — Vu (x). From Lemma 35.4.1,| uCcu(x) — Vu (x) -(y—x)||=|s(y)—8(x)|(y)-lg (y)(rears 5 eocr1/pIVu(z) ~ u(x) [Pas |x— yl.m/( eaKe Dy Iowa. y\)