1242 CHAPTER 35. WEAK DERIVATIVES

as ε → 0. By 35.5.4, there exists a subsequence ε → 0 such that for |z| < k and for eachi = 1,2, · · · ,n

(uψk)ε,i (z)→ (uψk),i (z) = u,i (z) a.e.

(uψk)ε (z)→ uψk (z) = u(z) a.e. (35.5.5)

Denoting the exceptional set by Ek, let

x,y /∈ ∪∞

k=1Ek ≡ E

and let k be so large thatB(0,k)⊇ B(x,2|x−y|).

Then by 35.4.1 and for x,y /∈ E,

|(uψk)ε (x)− (uψk)ε (y)|

≤C(∫

B(x,2|y−x|)|∇(uψk)ε |pdz

)1/p

|x−y|(1−n/p)

where C depends only on n. Similarly, by 35.4.2,∣∣(uψk)ε (x)− (uψk)ε (y)−∇(uψk)ε(x) · (y−x)

∣∣≤C(

1m(B(x,2 |x−y|))

∫B(x,2|x−y|)

|∇(uψk)ε(z)−∇(uψk)ε

(x) |pdz)1/p

| x− y|.

Now by 35.5.5 and 35.5.3 passing to the limit as ε → 0 yields

|u(x)−u(y)| ≤C(∫

B(x,2|y−x|)|∇u|pdz

)1/p

|x−y|(1−n/p) (35.5.6)

and|u(y)−u(x)−∇u(x) · (y−x)|

≤C(

1m(B(x,2 |x−y|))

∫B(x,2|x−y|)

|∇u(z)−∇u(x) |pdz)1/p

| x− y|. (35.5.7)

Redefining u on the set of mesure zero, E yields 35.5.6 for all x,y. This proves the theorem.

Corollary 35.5.2 Let u,u,i ∈ Lploc (R

n) for i = 1, · · · ,n and p > n. Then the representativeof u described in Theorem 35.5.1 is differentiable a.e.

Proof: From Theorem 35.5.1

|u(y)−u(x)−∇u(x) · (y−x)|

≤C(

1m(B(x,2 |x−y|))

∫B(x,2|x−y|)

|∇u(z)−∇u(x) |pdz)1/p

| x− y|. (35.5.8)

1242 CHAPTER 35. WEAK DERIVATIVESas € + 0. By 35.5.4, there exists a subsequence € — 0 such that for |z| < & and for eachi=1,2,---,n(uyy)ea (a) + (ug). (@) = Hs (2) ac.(uW,)e (z) > uW;, (Zz) =u(z) ae. (35.5.5)Denoting the exceptional set by Ex, letx,y ¢ Up Ex =Eand let k be so large thatThen by 35.4.1 and for x,y ¢ E,(uw; Je (X) — (Uy )e (Y)|1/p ;<c(f.Ivuwp)eltae) xy"B(x,2|y—x|)where C depends only on n. Similarly, by 35.4.2,|(uVa)e (x) — (UW )e (¥) — V (UWede (x) -(¥-¥)| S1 1/pc (<a Ty) Ipaan gy ede 2) — Vv (8) Pas) ix yl.Now by 35.5.5 and 35.5.3 passing to the limit as € > 0 yields. 1/plu (x) —u(y)| <c(| vu) Ix—y|(-n/P) (35.5.6)B(x.2iy—)andu(y) —w(x) — Vu(x) -(y—x)|1<C (m(B(x,2|x—y|))Redefining u on the set of mesure zero, FE yields 35.5.6 for all x, y. This proves the theorem.1/p| Yu(x) ~Vu(x)|Pds) Ix— yl. 5.5.7)B(x.2)x-y))Corollary 35.5.2 Let u,u,; € L? .(R") fori=1,--+,n and p >n. Then the representativelocof u described in Theorem 35.5.1 is differentiable a.e.Proof: From Theorem 35.5.1\u(y) — u(x) — Vu (x) -(y —x)|1<C> \/p< (cpm amcyy Iban ap WH) YH) as) Ix— yl. 35.5.8)