1250 CHAPTER 35. WEAK DERIVATIVES

on the Lebesgue measurable subsets of Ω. By Lemma 35.6.8 µ≪mn and so by the RadonNikodym theorem, there exists a nonnegative function, J (x) in L1

loc (Rn) such that wheneverE is Lebesgue measurable,

µ (E) = mn (h(E ∩Ω)) =∫

E∩Ω

J (x)dmn. (35.6.22)

Extend J to equal zero off Ω.

Lemma 35.6.11 The function, J (x) equals |detDh(x)| a.e.

Proof: Define

Q≡ {x ∈Ω : x is not a point of density of Ω}∪N∪

{x ∈Ω : x is not a Lebesgue point of J}.

Then Q is a set of measure zero and if x /∈ Q, then by 35.6.17, and 35.6.16,

|detDh(x)|

= limr→0

mn (h(B(x,r)))mn (B(x,r))

= limr→0

mn (h(B(x,r)))mn (h(B(x,r)∩Ω))

mn (h(B(x,r)∩Ω))

mn (B(x,r))

= limr→0

1mn (B(x,r))

∫B(x,r)∩Ω

J (y)dmn

= limr→0

1mn (B(x,r))

∫B(x,r)

J (y)dmn = J (x) .

the last equality because J was extended to be zero off Ω. This proves the lemma.Here is the change of variables formula for Lipschitz mappings. It is a special case of

the area formula.

Theorem 35.6.12 Let Ω be a Lebesgue measurable set, let f ≥ 0 be Lebesgue measurable.Then for h a Lipschitz mapping defined on Rn which is one to one on Ω,∫

h(Ω)f (y)dmn =

∫Ω

f (h(x)) |detDh(x)|dmn. (35.6.23)

Proof: Let F be a Borel set. It follows that h−1 (F) is a Lebesgue measurable set.Therefore, by 35.6.22,

mn(h(h−1 (F)∩Ω

))(35.6.24)

=∫

h(Ω)XF (y)dmn =

∫Ω

Xh−1(F) (x)J (x)dmn

=∫

XF (h(x))J (x)dmn.

1250 CHAPTER 35. WEAK DERIVATIVESon the Lebesgue measurable subsets of Q. By Lemma 35.6.8 < m, and so by the RadonNikodym theorem, there exists a nonnegative function, J (x) in L},,. (IR”) such that wheneverE is Lebesgue measurable,M(B) = ma (h(ENQ)) =f I(x)dmn. (35.6.22)Extend J to equal zero off Q.Lemma 35.6.11 The function, J (x) equals |det Dh (x)| a.e.Proof: DefineQ = {x €Q:x is not a point of density of Q} UNU{x € QO: x is not a Lebesgue point of J}.Then Q is a set of measure zero and if x ¢ Q, then by 35.6.17, and 35.6.16,|det Dh (x)|gg Mine (7)730 my (B(x,r))nm (h(B(x,r))) m7 (h (B(x, 7) 1 Q))730 mM, (h(B(x,r)NQ)) my (B(x,1r))1= lim ———— | J(y)dmy140 My (B(x,r)) JB(x,)n@ (y) dm1_ tim ecm Iran! dim, = J (x).the last equality because J was extended to be zero off Q. This proves the lemma.Here is the change of variables formula for Lipschitz mappings. It is a special case ofthe area formula.Theorem 35.6.12 Let Q be a Lebesgue measurable set, let f > 0 be Lebesgue measurable.Then for h a Lipschitz mapping defined on IR" which is one to one on Q,I fly)dm, = | f (h(x)) |det Dh (x)| drm. (35.6.23)h(Q) QProof: Let F be a Borel set. It follows that h~!(F) is a Lebesgue measurable set.Therefore, by 35.6.22,my (h(h~! (F)NQ)) (35.6.24)i oy FOAM = [ By-r(py (I (x) dim,- [ez (h(x)) J (x)dmp.