1252 CHAPTER 35. WEAK DERIVATIVES
Proof: It suffices to assume m = 1 because if this is shown, it may be applied to thecomponents of h to get the desired result. Suppose
|h(x)−h(y)| ≤ K |x−y|. (35.6.26)
Defineh(x)≡ inf{h(w)+K |x−w| : w ∈Ω}. (35.6.27)
If x ∈Ω, then for all w ∈Ω,
h(w)+K |x−w| ≥ h(x)
by 35.6.26. This shows h(x) ≤ h(x). But also you could take w = x in 35.6.27 whichyields h(x)≤ h(x). Therefore h(x) = h(x) if x ∈Ω.
Now suppose x,y ∈ Rn and consider∣∣h(x)−h(y)
∣∣. Without loss of generality assumeh(x)≥ h(y) . (If not, repeat the following argument with x and y interchanged.) Pick w∈Ω
such thath(w)+K |y−w|− ε < h(y).
Then ∣∣h(x)−h(y)∣∣= h(x)−h(y)≤ h(w)+K |x−w|−
[h(w)+K |y−w|− ε]≤ K |x−y|+ ε.
Since ε is arbitrary, ∣∣h(x)−h(y)∣∣≤ K |x−y|
and this proves the theorem.This yields a simple corollary to Theorem 35.6.12.
Corollary 35.6.14 Let h : Ω→ Rn be Lipschitz continuous and one to one where Ω is aLebesgue measurable set. Then if f ≥ 0 is Lebesgue measurable,∫
h(Ω)f (y)dmn =
∫Ω
f (h(x))∣∣detDh(x)
∣∣dmn. (35.6.28)
where h denotes a Lipschitz extension of h.