1276 CHAPTER 37. BASIC THEORY OF SOBOLEV SPACES

the Ascoli Arzela theorem, there exists a subsequence of this, still denoted by fk such that∑|α|≤m ||Dα ( fl− fk)||∞ < δ where δ satisfies

0 < δ < min(

ε

2,(

ε

8

)(ε

8M

)β/(λ−β )). (37.1.14)

Therefore, sup|α|=m ρβ (Dα ( fk− fl))≥ ε−δ for all k ̸= l. It follows that there exist pairs

of points and a multi index, α with |α|= m, {xkl ,ykl ,α} such that

ε−δ

2<|(Dα fk−Dα fl)(xkl)− ((Dα fk−Dα fl)(ykl))|

|xkl−ykl |β≤ 2M |xkl−ykl |λ−β (37.1.15)

and so considering the ends of the above inequality,(ε−δ

4M

)1/(λ−β )

< |xkl−ykl | .

Now also, since ∑|α|≤m ||Dα ( fl− fk)||∞ < δ , it follows from the first inequality in 37.1.15that

ε−δ

2<

2δ(ε−δ

4M

)β/(λ−β ).

Since δ < ε/2, this impliesε

4<

2δ(ε

8M

)β/(λ−β )

and so (ε

8

)(ε

8M

)β/(λ−β )< δ

contrary to 37.1.14. This proves the lemma.

Corollary 37.1.7 Let p > n,U and rU be as in Theorem 37.1.3 and let m be a nonnegativeinteger. Then rU : W m+1,p (Rn)→Cm,λ

(U)

is continuous as a map into Cm,λ(U)

for allλ ∈ [0,1− n

p ] and rU is compact if λ < 1− np .

Proof: Suppose uk→ 0 in W m+1,p (Rn) . Then from 37.1.13, if λ ≤ 1− np and |α|= m

ρλ (Dα uk)≤C ||Dα uk||1,p diam(U)1− n

p−λ .

Therefore, ρλ (Dα uk)→ 0. From Theorem 37.1.3 it follows that for |α| ≤ m,

||Dα uk||∞→ 0

and so ||uk||m,λ → 0. This proves the claim about continuity. The claim about compactnessfor λ < 1− n

p follows from Lemma 37.1.6 and this.

(Bounded in W m,p (Rn)rU→ Bounded in Cm,1− n

p(U) id→ Compact in Cm,λ

(U).)

It is just as important to consider the case where p < n. To do this case the followinglemma due to Gagliardo [53] will be of interest. See also [1].

1276 CHAPTER 37. BASIC THEORY OF SOBOLEV SPACESthe Ascoli Arzela theorem, there exists a subsequence of this, still denoted by f; such thatLhal<m||D% (fi — fe) loo < 6 where 6 satisfies€ /€ € \B/(A-B)0<S<mi 5 (=) (—) , 37.1.14<o<min (5 3 8M ( )Therefore, Sup) g)—m Pg (D% (fk — fi)) = € — 6 for all k #1. It follows that there exist pairsof points and a multi index, a@ with |a| =m, {xx, yx, %} such thate—6 c |(D* fk — D® fi) (Xu) — ((D* fk — D® fi) (Yur) |B < 2M |xq—yuil*P (7.1.15)2 xxi — Yuuand so considering the ends of the above inequality,e—8\!/A-B)( 4M ) < |xu — Yul.Now also, since Yjg\<m ||D% (fi — fx)that< 6, it follows from the first inequality in 37.1.15Ileoe—6 262 * (gyre4MSince 6 < €/2, this implies26E— <14 (6)?! B)B/(A-B)(G)(gw) <8contrary to 37.1.14. This proves the lemma.and soCorollary 37.1.7 Let p >n,U and ry be as in Theorem 37.1.3 and let m be a nonnegativeinteger. Then ry : W"*!? (R") > C™4 (U) is continuous as a map into cms (U) for allA € |0,1—4] and ry is compact ifA <1—<.Proof: Suppose u, — 0 in W”*!? (R”). Then from 37.1.13, if A < 1— 3 and |a@| =mPy (D% ux) <C||D%u4||;,, diam (U)' >”Therefore, p, (D%u,) + 0. From Theorem 37.1.3 it follows that for |a@| < m,||D° UK| |.. + 0and so ||ux||;.,, —> 0. This proves the claim about continuity. The claim about compactnessforA <1— p follows from Lemma 37.1.6 and this.(Bounded in W™? (IR) “4 Bounded in 0"? (U) “§ Compact in C”™ (VU) .)It is just as important to consider the case where p <n. To do this case the followinglemma due to Gagliardo [53] will be of interest. See also [1].