1326 CHAPTER 38. SOBOLEV SPACES BASED ON L2

Lemma 38.6.6 Suppose Γ is a Cm,1 manifold and (Γ,Wi,Ui,Γi,hi,gi) are as described inDefinition 38.6.1. Then for t ∈ [m,m+ s), it follows that if u ∈Ht (Γ) , then u ∈Ht (Γk) andthe restriction map is continuous. Also an equivalent norm for Ht (Γk) is given by

|||u|||t ≡ ||h∗ku||Ht (Uk)

.

Proof: Let u ∈ Ht (Γ) and let (Γk,W ′i ,U′i ,Γ′i,h′i,g′i) be the sets and functions which

define what is meant by Γk being a Cm,1 manifold as described in Definition 38.6.1. Alsolet (Γ,Wi,Ui,Γi,hi,gi) be pertain to Γ in the same way and let

{φ j

}be a C∞ partition of

unity for the{

Wj}

. Since the {W ′i } are locally finite, only finitely many can intersect Γk,say {W ′1, · · · ,W ′s} . Also only finitely many of the Wi can intersect Γk, say

{W1, · · · ,Wq

}.

Then letting {ψ ′i} be a C∞ partition of unity subordinate to the {W ′i } .

∑i=1

∣∣∣∣h′∗i (uψ′i)∣∣∣∣

Ht(U ′i )=

s

∑i=1

∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣h′∗i

(q

∑j=1

φ juψ′i

)∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣Ht(U ′i )

≤s

∑i=1

q

∑j=1

∣∣∣∣∣∣h′∗i φ juψ′i

∣∣∣∣∣∣Ht(U ′i )

=q

∑j=1

s

∑i=1

∣∣∣∣∣∣h′∗i φ juψ′i

∣∣∣∣∣∣Ht(U ′i )

=q

∑j=1

s

∑i=1

∣∣∣∣∣∣(g j ◦h′i)∗h∗jφ juψ

′i

∣∣∣∣∣∣Ht(U ′i )

.

By Lemma 38.3.3 on page 1312, there exists a single constant, C such that the above isdominated by C ∑

qj=1 ∑

si=1

∣∣∣∣∣∣h∗jφ juψ ′i

∣∣∣∣∣∣Ht(U j)

. Now by Corollary 38.3.5 on Page 1314, this

is no larger than

Cq

∑j=1

s

∑i=1

Cψ ′i

∣∣∣∣∣∣h∗jφ ju∣∣∣∣∣∣

Ht(U j)≤C

q

∑j=1

s

∑i=1

∣∣∣∣∣∣h∗jφ ju∣∣∣∣∣∣

Ht(U j)≤C

q

∑j=1

∣∣∣∣∣∣h∗jφ ju∣∣∣∣∣∣

Ht(U j)< ∞.

This shows that u restricted to Γk is in Ht (Γk). It also shows that the restriction map ofHt (Γ) to Ht (Γk) is continuous.

Now consider the norm |||·|||t . For u ∈ Ht (Γk) , let (Γk,W ′i ,U′i ,Γ′i,h′i,g′i) be sets and

functions which define an atlas for Γk. Since the {W ′i } are locally finite, only finitely manycan have nonempty intersection with Γk, say {W1, · · · ,Ws} . Thus i ≤ s for some finite s.The problem is to compare |||·|||t with ||·||Ht (Γk)

. As above, let {ψ ′i} denote a C∞ partition

of unity subordinate to the{

W ′j}

. Then

|||u|||t ≡ ||h∗ku||Ht (Uk)

=

∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣h∗k s

∑j=1

ψ′ju

∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣Ht (Uk)

≤s

∑j=1

∣∣∣∣∣∣h∗k (ψ′ju)∣∣∣∣∣∣

Ht (Uk)

=s

∑j=1

∣∣∣∣∣∣(g′j ◦hk)∗h′∗j

(ψ′ju)∣∣∣∣∣∣

Ht (Uk)≤C

s

∑j=1

∣∣∣∣∣∣h′∗j (ψ′ju)∣∣∣∣∣∣

Ht(

U ′j) .

1326 CHAPTER 38. SOBOLEV SPACES BASED ON L?Lemma 38.6.6 Suppose T is a C™! manifold and (C,W;,Ui,T;,hi,g;) are as described inDefinition 38.6.1. Then for t € |m,m+), it follows that if u € H' (1), then u € H' (T,) andthe restriction map is continuous. Also an equivalent norm for H' (T,) is given byIleel Te = Ullmceel gece) -Proof: Let u € H' (I) and let (;,W/,U/,;,hi,g/) be the sets and functions which1? 1? idefine what is meant by I; being a C’”! manifold as described in Definition 38.6.1. Alsolet (, W;,U;,;,hj,g;) be pertain to Tin the same way and let {o;} be a C® partition ofunity for the {Wj}. Since the {W/} are locally finite, only finitely many can intersect I',,say {Wy,--- ,W/}. Also only finitely many of the W; can intersect Ty, say {Wi,--- Wa}.Then letting {y;} be a C® partition of unity subordinate to the {W/}.qh}* (x ow)J=q 8swySsY |ImF (ev) ln) =Dw(U))h;*@ ju;1(U})Ht(U!)||(@iont) "joBy Lemma 38.3.3 on page 1312, there exists a single constant, C such that the above isdominated by Cys) ye | hid ju; (u;). Now by Corollary 38.3.5 on Page 1314, thisis no larger thanqoscy ycj=li=l<0,H'(Uj)hijo ju| ; <CHI(U;) ~no jul]q Ssh‘¢ | <CJTJ H'(U;) ddThis shows that wu restricted to T, is in H’ (I). It also shows that the restriction map ofH' (I) to H' (T,) is continuous.Now consider the norm ||]-|||,. For uw € H‘ (I), let (Ty,W/,U/,1,hi,g/) be sets andfunctions which define an atlas for I. Since the {W/} are locally finite, only finitely manycan have nonempty intersection with T;, say {Wi,---,Ws}. Thus i < s for some finite s.The problem is to compare |||-|||, with ||-||,7(r,) - AS above, let {y;} denote a C® partitionof unity subordinate to the {w rh. Theni(vin)|WF (vi) aqui’Ssleh, = Wheel eco) = me vie <b HU)H'(U,)AT (Ux)(gobi) "hy (vn)