1472 CHAPTER 44. TRACE SPACES

Proof: That W/Z is a vector space is left to the reader. Why is ||·|| a norm? Supposeα ̸= 0. Then

||α [x]|| = ||[αx]|| ≡ inf{||αx+ z|| : z ∈ Z}= inf{||αx+αz|| : z ∈ Z}= |α| inf{||x+ z|| : z ∈ Z}= |α| ||[x]|| .

Now let ||[x]|| ≥ ||x+ z1||− ε and let ||[y]|| ≥ ||y+ z2||− ε where zi ∈ Z. Then

||[x]+ [y]|| ≡ ||[x+ y]|| ≤ ||x+ y+ z1 + z2||≤ ||x+ z1||+ ||y+ z2|| ≤ ||[x]||+ ||[y]||+2ε.

Since ε is arbitrary, this shows the triangle inequality. Clearly, ||[x]|| ≥ 0. It remains toshow that the only way ||[x]|| = 0 is for x ∈ Z. Suppose then that ||[x]|| = 0. This meansthere exist zn ∈ Z such that ||x+ zn|| → 0. Therefore, −x is a limit of a sequence of pointsof Z and since Z is closed, this requires −x ∈ Z. Hence x ∈ Z also because Z is a subspace.This shows ||·|| is a norm on W/Z. It remains to verify that W/Z is a Banach space.

Suppose {[xn]} is a Cauchy sequence in W/Z and suppose ||[xn]− [xn+1]|| < 12n+1 . Let

x′1 = x1. If x′n has been chosen let x′n+1 = xn+1 + zn+1 where zn+1 ∈ Z be such that

∣∣∣∣x′n+1− x′n∣∣∣∣ ≤ ||[xn+1− xn]||+

12(n+1)

= ||[xn+1]− [xn]||+1

2(n+1) <12n .

It follows {x′n} is a Cauchy sequence in W and so it must converge to some x ∈W. Now

||[x]− [xn]||= ||[x− xn]||=∣∣∣∣[x− x′n

]∣∣∣∣≤ ∣∣∣∣x− x′n∣∣∣∣

which converges to 0. Now if {[xn]} is just a Cauchy sequence, there exists a subsequencesatisfying

∣∣∣∣[xnk

]−[xnk+1

]∣∣∣∣ < 12k+1 and so from the first part, the subsequence converges

to some [x] ∈W/Z and so the original Cauchy sequence also converges. therefore, W/Z isa Banach space as claimed.

Definition 44.1.7 Define T (A0,A1, p,θ) = T, to consist of{a ∈ A0 +A1 : a = lim

t→0+f (t) for some f ∈W (A0,A1, p,θ)

},

the limit taking place in A0 +A1. Let γ f be defined for f ∈W by γ f ≡ limt→0+ f (t) . ThusT = γ (W ) . As above Z ≡ { f ∈W : γ f = 0}= ker(γ) .

Lemma 44.1.8 T is a Banach space with norm given by

||a||T ≡ inf{|| f ||W : f (0) = a} . (44.1.5)

1472 CHAPTER 44. TRACE SPACESProof: That W/Z is a vector space is left to the reader. Why is ||-|| a norm? Supposea #0. Then|| [||||[orx] || = inf {||ox+z|| :z © Z}inf {||@x+ a@z||:z€Z}|ox| inf {||x-+z|| :z €Z} = Jae || [I].Now let ||[x]|| > ||x-+z1|| —€ and let ||[y]]| > ||y + zo|| — € where z; € Z. Then[+ y]|] < |e +yt+z1+z)]|e+ zal] + |ly+zal] < |||] + IID] |] + 2e-[Ibe] + DIIASince € is arbitrary, this shows the triangle inequality. Clearly, ||[x]|| > 0. It remains toshow that the only way ||[x]|| = 0 is for x € Z. Suppose then that ||[x]|| = 0. This meansthere exist z, € Z such that ||x+z,|| + 0. Therefore, —x is a limit of a sequence of pointsof Z and since Z is closed, this requires —x € Z. Hence x € Z also because Z is a subspace.This shows ||-|| is a norm on W/Z. It remains to verify that W /Z is a Banach space.Suppose {[x;]} is a Cauchy sequence in W/Z and suppose ||[Xn] — [Xn41]|| < aT Letx, =x. If x, has been chosen let x), , =Xn41+Zn41 where Z,41 € Z be such that1[x41 — Xn || < IIlen+1 — nll + Soy1 1= IIlen+1] — Pall + Say < aeIt follows {x/,} is a Cauchy sequence in W and so it must converge to some x € W. NowI<} — [xn] = [fe — nll = |] 2-2] | S [fenwhich converges to 0. Now if {[x,]} is just a Cauchy sequence, there exists a subsequencesatisfying || [xn, | — [Xn al || < HT and so from the first part, the subsequence convergesto some [x] € W/Z and so the original Cauchy sequence also converges. therefore, W/Z isa Banach space as claimed.Definition 44.1.7 Define T (Ao,A1, p, 9) = T, to consist of{4 E€AQ+A):a= lim f(t) for some F EW (Ao.Arsp.8)},10+the limit taking place in Ay + A\. Let yf be defined for f € W by yf = lim;-40+ f (t) . ThusT=y(W).As above Z={f ©W: yf =0} =ker(y).Lemma 44.1.8 T is a Banach space with norm given by\lallr = inf {|| fllw : £0) =a}. (44.1.5)