1514 CHAPTER 46. SOBOLEV SPACES ON MANIFOLDS

But also, there exists a subsequence, still denoted by j such that for each i{h∗i (u jψ i)(x)

}∞

j=1

is a Cauchy sequence for a.e. x. Since hi is given to be Lipschitz, it maps sets of measure0 to sets of n dimensional Hausdorff measure zero. Therefore,{

u jψ i (y)}∞

j=1

is a Cauchy sequence for µ a.e. y ∈Wi ∩Γ where µ denotes the n dimensional Hausdorffmeasure. It follows that for µ a.e. y,

{u j (y)

}∞

j=1 is a Cauchy sequence and so it convergesto a function denoted as u(y).

u j (y)→ u(y) µ a.e.

Therefore, wi (x)= h∗i (uψ i)(x) a.e. and this shows h∗i (uψ i)∈W s,p (Ui) . Thus u∈W s,p (Γ)showing completeness. It is clear ||·||s,p,Γ is a norm. Thus L is an isometry of W s,p (Γ) anda closed subspace of ∏

li=1 W s,p (Ui). By Corollary 45.4.2, W s,p (Ui) is reflexive which im-

plies the product is reflexive. Closed subspaces of reflexive spaces are reflexive by Lemma21.2.7 on Page 655 and so W s,p (Γ) is also reflexive. This proves the lemma.

I now show that any two such norms are equivalent.Suppose

{W ′j ,φ j,Γ j,Vj,g j,G j

}r

j=1and {Wi,ψ i,Γi,Ui,hi,Hi}l

i=1 both satisfy the con-

ditions described above. Let ||·||1s,p,Γ denote the norm defined by

||u||1s,p,Γ ≡r

∑j=1

∣∣∣∣∣∣g∗j (uφ j

)∣∣∣∣∣∣s,p,V j

≤r

∑j=1

∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣g∗j(

l

∑i=1

uφ jψ i

)∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣s,p,V j

≤∑j,i

∣∣∣∣∣∣g∗j (uφ jψ i

)∣∣∣∣∣∣s,p,V j

= ∑j,i

∣∣∣∣∣∣g∗j (uφ jψ i

)∣∣∣∣∣∣s,p,g−1

j

(Wi∩W ′j

) (46.1.2)

Now define a new norm ||u||1,gs,p,Γ by the formula 46.1.2. This norm is determined by{W ′j ∩Wi,ψ iφ j,Γ j ∩Γi,Vj,gi, j,Gi, j

}where gi, j = g j. Thus the identity map

id :(

W s,p (Γ) , ||·||1,gs,p,Γ

)→(

W s,p (Γ) , ||·||1s,p,Γ)

is continuous. It follows the two norms, ||·||1,gs,p,Γ and ||·||1s,p,Γ , are equivalent by the open

mapping theorem. In a similar way, the norms, ||·||2,hs,p,Γ and ||·||2s,p,Γ are equivalent where

||u||2s,p,Γ ≡l

∑j=1||h∗i (uψ i)||s,p,Ui

1514 CHAPTER 46. SOBOLEV SPACES ON MANIFOLDSBut also, there exists a subsequence, still denoted by 7 such that for each i©{h; (ujW;) (x) }is a Cauchy sequence for a.e. x. Since h; is given to be Lipschitz, it maps sets of measure0 to sets of n dimensional Hausdorff measure zero. Therefore,{ujW; (Y) fyis a Cauchy sequence for Lt a.e. y € W;MT where pu denotes the n dimensional Hausdorffmeasure. It follows that for y a.e. y, {u ily) hia is a Cauchy sequence and so it convergesto a function denoted as u(y).uj(y) u(y) Wace.Therefore, w; (x) = hj (uy;) (x) a.e. and this shows h* (uy;) € W*? (U;) . Thus u € W*? (L)showing completeness. It is clear ||-||, , > is anorm. Thus L is an isometry of W*? (IP) anda closed subspace of []/_, W*” (U;). By Corollary 45.4.2, W*? (U;) is reflexive which im-plies the product is reflexive. Closed subspaces of reflexive spaces are reflexive by Lemma21.2.7 on Page 655 and so W*? (T) is also reflexive. This proves the lemma.I now show that any two such norms are equivalent.Suppose {WhO 0).Vi.eiGzf and {Wi,W;,0;,Ui,bi, Hi}, both satisfy the con-ditions described above. Let ||-| I. pr denote the norm defined byrel = |e; (uo)gj (201) <D|[e; (19 ;vi)i=l spV; i= Ele (vim)Now define a new norm ||u| |; ne by the formula 46.1.2. This norm is determined byS,p,Vj;<)jalnv,(46.1.2)s.p.g;'(WinW)){winw,, Vio LT. Vj.8iGi}where g; ; = g;. Thus the identity mapid: (WP (ED |bilekr) > (We)1Isp )l are equivalent by the openspT?. Iis continuous. It follows the two norms, or and ||-||mapping theorem. In a similar way, the norms, ||-| ne and ale pr are equivalent whereI2 _—sor = Wb HWM p.0;j=l