1531

Theorem 47.0.19 Let (Ω,Σ) be a measure space and let G∈ Σ̂×B(X) where X is a Suslinspace. Then

projΩ (G) ∈ Σ̂.

Proof: By the previous lemma, G ∈ Σ0×B(X) where Σ0 is countably generated. If(Ω,Σ0) were separable, we could then apply Lemma 47.0.17 and be done. Unfortunately,we don’t know Σ0 separates the points of Ω. Therefore, we define an equivalence class onthe points of Ω as follows. We say ω ∽ ω1 if and only if XA (ω) =XA (ω1) for all A∈ Σ0.Now the nice thing to notice about this equivalence relation is that if ω ∈ A ∈ Σ0, and ifω ∽ ω1, then 1 = XA (ω) = XA (ω1) implying ω1 ∈ A also. Therefore, every set of Σ0is the union of equivalence classes. It follows that for A ∈ Σ0, and π the map given byπω ≡ [ω] where [ω] is the equivalence class determined by ω,

π (A)∩π (Ω\A) = /0.

Suppose now that Hn ∈ Σ0×B(X). If ([ω] ,x) ∈ ∩∞n=1π× idX (Hn) , then for each n,

([w] ,x) = (πwn,x)

for some (ωn,x) ∈ Hn. But this implies ω ∽ ωn and so from the above observation thatthe sets of Σ0 are unions of equivalence classes, it follows that (ω,x) ∈ Hn. Therefore,(ω,x) ∈ ∩∞

n=1Hn and so ([ω] ,x) = π× idX (ω,x) where (ω,x) ∈ ∩∞n=1Hn . This shows that

π× idX (∩∞n=1Hn)⊇ ∩∞

n=1π× idX (Hn) .

In fact these two sets are equal because the other inclusion is obvious. We will denote byΩ1 the set of equivalence classes and Σ1 will be the subsets, S1, of Ω1 such that S1 ={[ω] : ω ∈ S ∈ Σ0} . Then (Ω1,Σ1) is clearly a measure space which is separable. Let

F ≡{

H ∈ Σ0×B(X) : π× idX (H) ,π× idX(HC) ∈ Σ1×B(X)

}.

We see that the measurable rectangles, A×B where A ∈ Σ0 and B ∈ B(X) are in F , thatfrom the above observation on countable intersections, F is closed with respect to count-able unions and closed with respect to complements. Therefore, F is a σ algebra and soF = Σ0×B(X) . By Lemma 47.0.14 (Ω1,Σ1) is isomorphic to (E,B(E)) where E is asubspace of {0,1}N . Denoting the isomorphism by h, it follows as in Lemma 47.0.17 thath× idX maps Σ1×B(X) to B(E)×B(X) . Therefore, we see f ≡ h◦π is a mapping fromΩ to E which has the property that f × idX maps Σ0×B(X) to B(E)×B(X) . Now fromthe proof of Lemma 47.0.17 starting with the claim, we see that G ∈ Σ̂0. However, if µ is a

finite measure on Σ̂, then(

Σ̂

= Σµ and so Σ̂0 ⊆(̂

Σ̂

)⊆ Σ̂. This proves the theorem.

1531Theorem 47.0.19 Let (Q,2) be a measure space and let G € =xB (X) where X is a Suslinspace. Then .Projo (G) EX.Proof: By the previous lemma, G € Xp x B(X) where Xp is countably generated. If(Q,2o) were separable, we could then apply Lemma 47.0.17 and be done. Unfortunately,we don’t know Xp separates the points of Q. Therefore, we define an equivalence class onthe points of Q as follows. We say @ ~ @ if and only if 24 (@) = %4 (@1) forall A € Xo.Now the nice thing to notice about this equivalence relation is that if @ € A € Xo, and if@~ @,, then 1 = 24(@) = 2%4(@1) implying @, € A also. Therefore, every set of Xpis the union of equivalence classes. It follows that for A € Xo, and 7 the map given by1 = [@| where [a] is the equivalence class determined by @,m™(A)N#(Q\A) =9.Suppose now that H, € Xo x B(X). If ([@],x) € N?_, a x idy (Hn), then for each n,([w] x) = (Wn, x)for some (@,,x) € H,. But this implies @ ~ @, and so from the above observation thatthe sets of Xp are unions of equivalence classes, it follows that (@,x) € H,. Therefore,(@,x) € M_, Hn and so ([@],x) = 7 x idy (@,x) where (@,x) € N_,H, . This shows that7 xX idy (M7) An) D NH X idx (An).In fact these two sets are equal because the other inclusion is obvious. We will denote byQ, the set of equivalence classes and ; will be the subsets, $;, of ©, such that S$) ={[@] : @ € S € Xo}. Then (Q), 21) is clearly a measure space which is separable. LetF ={H € Xo x B(X): 1x idy (H) a x idy (H©) EL) x B(X) }.We see that the measurable rectangles, A x B where A € Xp and B € B(X) are in F, thatfrom the above observation on countable intersections, ¥ is closed with respect to count-able unions and closed with respect to complements. Therefore, .¥ is a o algebra and soF =X x B(X). By Lemma 47.0.14 (Q1,21) is isomorphic to (E,B(E)) where E is asubspace of {0,1}. Denoting the isomorphism by h, it follows as in Lemma 47.0.17 thathx idy maps L; x B(X) to B(E) x B(X). Therefore, we see f =ho7 is a mapping fromQ to E which has the property that f x idy maps Xp x B(X) to B(E) x B(X). Now fromAthe proof of Lemma 47.0.17 starting with the claim, we see that G € Xp. However, if UW is afinite measure on y, then (5) =X, and so Eo Cc (5) C E. This proves the theorem.Ll