1544 CHAPTER 48. MULTIFUNCTIONS AND THEIR MEASURABILITY

basic open set in the topology of X . Thus let O = ∏∞i=1 Oi where each Oi is a proper open

subset of R only for i ∈ { j1, · · · , jm} . Then,

Γ−n (O) = ∪k≥n∩m

r=1{

ω :⟨z jr ,uk (ω)

⟩∈ O jr

},

which is a measurable set since uk is measurable.Then, it follows that ω → Γn (ω) is strongly measurable because it has compact values

in X , thanks to Tychonoff’s theorem. Thus Γ−n (H) = {ω : H ∩Γn (ω) ̸= /0} is measurablewhenever H is a closed set. Now, let Γ(ω) be defined as ∩nΓn (ω) and then for H closed,

Γ− (H) = ∩nΓ

−n (H)

and each set in the intersection is measurable, so this shows that ω→ Γ(ω) is also measur-able. Therefore, it has a measurable selection g(ω). It follows from the definition of Γ(ω)that there exists a subsequence n(ω) such that

g(ω) = limn(ω)→∞

h(un(ω) (ω)

)in X .

In terms of components, we have

gi (ω) = limn(ω)→∞

⟨zi,un(ω) (ω)

⟩.

Furthermore, there is a further subsequence, still denoted with n(ω), such that un(ω) (ω)→u(ω) weakly. This means that for each i,

gi (ω) = limn(ω)→∞

⟨zi,un(ω) (ω)

⟩= ⟨zi,u(ω)⟩ .

Thus, for each zi in a dense set, ω → ⟨zi,u(ω)⟩ is measurable. Since the zi are dense,this implies ω → ⟨z,u(ω)⟩ is measurable for every z ∈ U ′ and so by the Pettis theorem,ω → u(ω) is measurable.

There is an easy version of this which follows from the same arguments.

Corollary 48.2.3 Let K (ω) be a compact subset of a separable metric space X and sup-pose

{u j (ω)

}∞

j=1 ⊆ K (ω) with each ω → u j (ω) measurable into X. Then there existsu(ω) ∈ K (ω) such that ω→ u(ω) is measurable into X and a subsequence n(ω) depend-ing on ω such that limn(ω)→∞ un(ω) (ω) = u(ω).

Proof: DefineΓn (ω) = ∪k≥nuk (ω),

This is a nonempty compact subset of K (ω)⊆ X . I claim that ω→ Γn (ω) is a measurablemultifunction into X . It is necessary to show that Γ−n (O) defined as {ω : Γn (ω)∩O ̸= /0} ismeasurable whenever O is open in X . For ω ∈ Γ−n (O) it means that some uk (ω)∈O,k≥ n.Thus Γ−n (O) = ∪k≥nu−1

k (O) and this is measurable by the assumption that each uk is.Since Γ−n (ω) is compact, it is also strongly measurable by Proposition 48.1.4, meaningthat Γ− (H) is measurable whenever H is closed. Now, let Γ(ω) be defined as

Γ(ω)≡ ∩nΓn (ω)

1544 CHAPTER 48. MULTIFUNCTIONS AND THEIR MEASURABILITYbasic open set in the topology of X. Thus let O = J], O; where each O; is a proper opensubset of R only for i € {j1,--- , jm}. Then,Ty (O) = Upon Wy {@ : (zj,,uxe(@)) € Oj,},which is a measurable set since uz is measurable.Then, it follows that @ > T,, (@) is strongly measurable because it has compact valuesin X, thanks to Tychonoff’s theorem. Thus [, (H) = {@: HOT, (@) 4 0} is measurablewhenever H is a closed set. Now, let '(@) be defined as N,IT, (@) and then for H closed,I (H)=Onl, (A)and each set in the intersection is measurable, so this shows that @ + I'(@) is also measur-able. Therefore, it has a measurable selection g(@). It follows from the definition of (@)that there exists a subsequence n (@) such thatgz (@) = lm h (un(o) (@)) in X.n(@)—0In terms of components, we haveg:() =| Tim (zit) (@))-Furthermore, there is a further subsequence, still denoted with n(@), such that up(¢) (@) >u(@) weakly. This means that for each i,i(o) = Timm (Zisteniw (0)) = (zine (@)).Thus, for each z; in a dense set, @ — (z;,u(@)) is measurable. Since the z; are dense,this implies @ — (z,u(@)) is measurable for every z € U’ and so by the Pettis theorem,@ — u(@) is measurable. §JThere is an easy version of this which follows from the same arguments.Corollary 48.2.3 Let K (@) be a compact subset of a separable metric space X and sup-pose {uj (@)} 5, C K(@) with each @ — uj(@) measurable into X. Then there existsu(@) € K(@) such that ® + u(@) is measurable into X and a subsequence n(@) depend-ing on @ such that limy(@) 0. Un(@) (@) = u(@).Proof: DefineT, (@) = Ure nulx (@),This is a nonempty compact subset of K (@) C X. I claim that @ + T,, (@) is a measurablemultifunction into X. It is necessary to show that I, (O) defined as {@ :T;, (@) NO FO} ismeasurable whenever O is open in X. For @ €T, (O) it means that some uz (@) € O,k >n.Thus I; (O) = Usenu;,'(O) and this is measurable by the assumption that each uj is.Since [, (@) is compact, it is also strongly measurable by Proposition 48.1.4, meaningthat I~ (H) is measurable whenever H is closed. Now, let '(@) be defined asT'(@) =NT,(@)