1556 CHAPTER 48. MULTIFUNCTIONS AND THEIR MEASURABILITY

Proof: The space X is separable and so by the Riesz representation theorem and thePettis theorem, it suffices to verify that for y ∈ X ,

ω →∫ T

0

∫ t

0f(s,y(s)+x0 (ω) ,ω)ds ·σ (t)dµ (t)

is measurable whenever σ ∈ L∞ ([0,T ] ,µ) and µ is a finite Radon measure. By productmeasurability, there are simple functions sn (t,x,ω) converging to f(t,x,ω) pointwise andwe can have |sn (t,x,ω)| ≤ |f(t,x,ω)| where

sn (t,x,ω) =mn

∑i=1

ciXEni(t,x,ω) ,En

i ∈B ([0,T ]×Rn)×F .

Therefore, for fixed ω,(t,x)→ sn (t,x+x0 (ω) ,ω) is Borel measurable and so

t→ sn (t,y(t)+x0 (ω) ,ω)

is also Borel measurable so the above integral with f replaced with sn surely makes sense.Then for y ∈ X , you would have from dominated convergence theorem and assumed esti-mate 48.2.4, ∫ T

0

∫ t

0sn (s,y(s)+x0 (ω) ,ω)ds ·σ (t)dµ (t)

→∫ T

0

∫ t

0f(s,y(s)+x0 (ω) ,ω)ds ·σ (t)dµ (t)

and so the issue devolves to whether

ω →∫ T

0

∫ t

0sn (s,y(s)+x0 (ω) ,ω)ds ·σ (t)dµ (t) (48.2.5)

is F measurable. Let P be the rectangles B×F where B is Borel in [0,T ]×Rn and F ∈F .Let G ≡{

E ∈ σ (P) : ω →∫ T

0

∫ t

0XE (s,y(s)+x0 (ω) ,ω)ds ·σ (t)dµ (t) is F measurable

}the above condition holding for all σdµ . Obviously G ⊇P . Indeed,

ω →XB (s,y(s)+x0 (ω))XF (ω) = XB×F (s,y(s)+x0 (ω) ,ω)

is measurable because B is Borel and composition of Borel functions with a measurablefunction is measurable. It is also clear that G is closed with respect to countable disjointunions and complements. This follows from the monotone convergence theorem in thecase of disjoint unions and from the observation that

XE (s,y(s)+x0 (ω) ,ω)+XEC (s,y(s)+x0 (ω) ,ω) = 1

in the case of complements. Hence, by Dynkin’s lemma, G = σ (P) = B ([0,T ]×Rn)×F . On consideration of components of sn, it follows that 48.2.5 is indeed measurable andthis establishes the needed result.

1556 CHAPTER 48. MULTIFUNCTIONS AND THEIR MEASURABILITYProof: The space X is separable and so by the Riesz representation theorem and thePettis theorem, it suffices to verify that for y € X,o+ [ ['t(s.9(s)+x0(0).0)as-0 duis measurable whenever o € L*([0,7],) and p is a finite Radon measure. By productmeasurability, there are simple functions s, (t,x, @) converging to f (t,x, @) pointwise andwe can have |s, (t,x, @)| < |f (t,x, @)| wheremnSn (t,x,@) = )° ci Ren (t,x, ) ,E? € B([0,T] xR") x F.i=1Therefore, for fixed @, (t,x) + 8, (t,x -+x9(@),@) is Borel measurable and sot > Sn (y(t) + x0 (@), @)is also Borel measurable so the above integral with f replaced with s,, surely makes sense.Then for y € X, you would have from dominated convergence theorem and assumed esti-mate 48.2.4,[ [ s:6.966) +x0(0) e)ds-o (au> [ [t6.96)+20(@),0)ds-o (anoand so the issue devolves to whetherns [[s (s,y(s) + x0 (@),@)ds-o (t) du (t) (48.2.5)is ¥ measurable. Let Y be the rectangles B x F where B is Borel in [0,7] x R” and F € ¥.Let Y =T ot{E €0(F):a >| [ Xz (s,y(s) +X9(@),@)ds-o(t)du(t) is F measurable}0 JOthe above condition holding for all od. Obviously Y D FY. Indeed,© — 2p (s,y (8) +X0(@)) Zr (@) = Zaxe (S,y(s) +X0(@),@)is measurable because B is Borel and composition of Borel functions with a measurablefunction is measurable. It is also clear that Y is closed with respect to countable disjointunions and complements. This follows from the monotone convergence theorem in thecase of disjoint unions and from the observation thatXE (s,y (5) +X0(@),@) + Lec (5, y(s) +X0(@),@) = 1in the case of complements. Hence, by Dynkin’s lemma, Y = o (Y) = &((0,T] x R") x#. On consideration of components of s,, it follows that 48.2.5 is indeed measurable andthis establishes the needed result.