1564 CHAPTER 48. MULTIFUNCTIONS AND THEIR MEASURABILITY

a similar statement for Ĉ, it follows that B̂ε(ω)

(xε(ω)

k (ω) ,ω)= θ (ω)∗ i(ω)∗wε(ω)B

k (ω)

is within r of the closed convex bounded set B̂(x(ω) ,ω) whenever ε (ω) is small enough,similar for Ĉ. Thus

θ (ω)∗ i(ω)∗wBk (ω) ∈ B̂(x(ω) ,ω) ,

similar for Ĉ. Since this last set is convex, it follows that

θ (ω)∗ i(ω)∗∑k

tk (ω)wBk (ω) ∈ B̂(x(ω) ,ω)

similar for Ĉ.Now recall 48.3.9 and the inequality 48.3.12 which imply that for z ∈ θ (ω)−1 K (ω) ,(y(ω)−θ (ω)∗ i(ω)∗

(n

∑k=0

tk (ω)wBk (ω)+

n

∑k=0

tk (ω)wCk (ω)

),z−x(ω)

)(48.3.14)

= limε(ω)→0

(y(ω)−

(∑

nk=0 tε(ω)

k (ω)θ (ω)∗ i(ω)∗wε(ω)Bk (ω)

+∑nk=0 tε(ω)

k (ω)θ (ω)∗ i(ω)∗wε(ω)Ck (ω)

),z−xε(ω) (ω)

)

= limε(ω)→0

y(ω)−

 ∑nk=0 tε(ω)

k (ω) B̂ε(ω)

(xε(ω)

k ,ω)

+∑nk=0 tε(ω)

k (ω)Ĉε(ω)

(xε(ω)

k ,ω)  ,z−xε(ω) (ω)

Recall 48.3.11 and 48.3.13 which imply from the above conventions that the sum in theabove equals B̂ε(ω)

(xε(ω),ω

)+Ĉε(ω)

(xε(ω),ω

). Thus the above equals

limε(ω)→0

(y(ω)−

(B̂ε(ω)

(xε(ω),ω

)+Ĉε(ω)

(xε(ω),ω

)),z−xε(ω) (ω)

)≤ 0

Now wε(ω)Bk (ω) ∈ B

(θ (ω)xε(ω)

k (ω) ,ω)

and the weak uppersemicontinuity must then

imply that wBk (ω) ∈ B(θ (ω)x(ω) ,ω) , a similar statement holding for C. By convexity,

wB (ω)≡n

∑k=0

tk (ω)wBk (ω) ∈ B(θ (ω)x(ω) ,ω) ,

similar for C. Then from 48.3.14,(y(ω)−θ (ω)∗ i(ω)∗

(n

∑k=0

tk (ω)wBk (ω)+

n

∑k=0

tk (ω)wCk (ω)

),z−x(ω)

)=

(θ (ω)∗ i(ω)∗ (y(ω)− (wB (ω)+wC (ω))) ,z−x(ω)

)≤ 0

It follows that if x(ω)≡ θ (ω)x(ω) ,

⟨y(ω)− (wB (ω)+wC (ω)) ,θ (ω)z− x(ω)⟩ ≤ 0

each of x(ω),wB (ω) ,wC (ω)

are measurable and wB (ω)∈B(x(ω) ,ω) ,wC (ω)∈C (x(ω) ,ω) . Since θ (ω)z is a genericelement of K (ω) , this proves the theorem.

Obviously one could have any finite sum of operators having the same properties asB,C above and one could get a similar result.

1564 CHAPTER 48. MULTIFUNCTIONS AND THEIR MEASURABILITYa similar statement for C, it follows that Bevo) (x (@) 0) = 0(@)* i(w)* wee)? (@)is within r of the closed convex bounded set B (x (@) ,@) whenever € (@) is small enough,similar for C. Thus0 (@)*i(@)* we (@) € B(x(@),@),similar for C. Since this last set is convex, it follows that0) Ln (@ @) € B(x(@),@)similar for C.Now recall 48.3.9 and the inequality 48.3.12 which imply that for z € @(@) 'K(@),k=0 k=0[vio —0(@)*i(@)* e ty (@) we (@) + y tk (@) we )) +x) (48.3.14)€(@)0n 4£(@) key yx €(@)B= lim [vio ( Lio (@) 6(@) fe) Wy)Phot”) (0) Bew) (x{°°',@)= lim | y(@)- (o) . (0)€(@)0 + ot (@ ) Cea) (x; 0)Recall 48.3.11 and 48.3.13 which imply from the above conventions that the sum in theabove equals Bevo) (Xe(a); ) +Ce@) (Xe(a); @) . Thus the above equals_(li,, (¥(@) ~ (Beta (Xe(a), ©) +Ce(a (Xe(o):®)) 2 Xe(w) (@)) $0»Z— Xe(@) (@)Now wees (@) EB (6 (@) xe) (@) 0) and the weak uppersemicontinuity must thenimply that w? (@) € B(@(@)x(@) ,@) , a similar statement holding for C. By convexity,=Yalo @) € B(O(@)x(),@),similar for C. Then from 48.3.14,fo ~6(@)*i(@)" [Ea wf(o) + Yl) we )) +x)k=0= ore @)" (y(@) — “ p(@) + wc (@))),z—x(@)) <0each of x(@),wp (@),wc (@)are measurable and wg (@) € B(x(@),@) , wc (@) EC (x(@) , @) . Since 6 (@) zis a genericelement of K(q@), this proves the theorem. §fObviously one could have any finite sum of operators having the same properties asB,C above and one could get a similar result.