48.7. LIMIT CONDITIONS FOR NEMYTSKII OPERATORS 1585

which then satisfies F (t) ̸= /0. Now F (t) is closed and convex in V ′.Claim: t→ F (t) has a measurable selection off a set of measure zero.Proof of claim: Letting B(0,C (t)) contain A(u(t) , t) , we can assume t → C (t) is

measurable by using the estimates and the measurability of u. For p∈N, let Sp be given by{t : C (t)< p}. If it is shown that F has a measurable selection on Sp, then it follows that ithas a measurable selection. Thus in what follows, assume that t ∈ Sp.

Define

G(t)≡{

w : ⟨w,u(t)− y(t)⟩< α (t)+1n

, t /∈ Σ

}∩B(0, p)

Thus, it was shown above that this G(t) ̸= /0. For U open,

G− (U)≡{

t ∈ Sp : for some w ∈U ∩B(0, p) ,⟨w,u(t)− y(t)⟩< α (t)+1n

}(*)

Let{

w j}

be a dense subset of U ∩B(0, p). This is possible because V ′ is separable. Theexpression in ∗ equals

∪∞k=1

{t ∈ Sp : ⟨wk,u(t)− y(t)⟩< α (t)+

1n

}which is measurable. Thus G is a measurable multifunction.

Since t → G(t) is measurable, there is a sequence {wn (t)} of measurable functionssuch that ∪∞

n=1wn (t) equals

G(t) ={

w : ⟨w,u(t)− y(t)⟩ ≤ α (t)+1n

, t /∈ Σ

}∩B(0, p)

As shown above, there exists wt in A(u(t) , t) as well as G(t) . Thus there is a sequenceof wr (t) converging to wt . Since t → A(u(t) , t) is a measurable multifunction, it has acountable subset of measurable functions {zm (t)} which is dense in A(u(t) , t). Let

Uk (t)≡ ∪mB(

zm (t) ,1k

)⊆ A(u(t) , t)+B

(0,

2k

)Now define A1k = {t : w1 (t) ∈Uk (t)} . Then let A2k = {t /∈ A1k : w2 (t) ∈Uk (t)} and

A3k ={

t /∈ ∪2i=1Aik : w3 (t) ∈Uk (t)

}and so forth. Any t ∈ Sp must be contained in one

of these Ark for some r since if not so, there would not be a sequence wr (t) convergingto wt ∈ A(u(t) , t). These Arp partition Sp and each is measurable since the {zk (t)} aremeasurable. Let

ŵk (t)≡∞

∑r=1

XArk (t)wr (t)

Thus ŵk (t) is in Uk (t) for all t ∈ Sp and equals exactly one of the wm (t) ∈ G(t).Also, by construction, the ŵk (·) are bounded in L∞ (Sp;V ′). Therefore, there is a subse-

quence of these, still called ŵk which converges weakly to a function w in L2 (Sp;V ′) .

Thus w is a weak limit point of co(∪∞

j=kŵ j

)for each k. Therefore, in the open ball

48.7. LIMIT CONDITIONS FOR NEMYTSKII OPERATORS 1585which then satisfies F (t) 4@. Now F (t) is closed and convex in V’.Claim: t — F (t) has a measurable selection off a set of measure zero.Proof of claim: Letting B(0,C(t)) contain A(u(t),t), we can assume t — C(f) ismeasurable by using the estimates and the measurability of u. For p € N, let S, be given by{t: C(t) < p}. If it is shown that F has a measurable selection on S,,, then it follows that ithas a measurable selection. Thus in what follows, assume that ¢ € Sp.DefineG(t)= {w: (wu(t)—y(t)) << a@(t)+ a t¢ x} NB(0,p)Thus, it was shown above that this G(t) 4 0. For U open,G U)= {1 € S,: for some w € UMB(0,p), (w,u(t)—y(t)) < a(t) + 7} (*)Let {w,;} be a dense subset of UMB(0,p). This is possible because V’ is separable. Theexpression in * equalsnUre {1 € Sp: (we u(t) —y(t)) < a()+2}which is measurable. Thus G is a measurable multifunction.Since t + G(t) is measurable, there is a sequence {w, (t)} of measurable functionssuch that U*_,w, (t) equals(t)= {w: (w,u(t)—y(t)) < a()+ir¢ eb nBO7)QAs shown above, there exists w; in A (u(t) ,t) as well as G(t). Thus there is a sequenceof w,(t) converging to w;. Since t + A(u(t),t) is a measurable multifunction, it has acountable subset of measurable functions {z,, (t)} which is dense in A (u(t) ,t). LetUe () = Unb (« 7) CA(u(e).)+B(0.;Now define Aj, = {ft : wy (t) € Ug (t)}. Then let Ao, = {t € Ajg : wo (t) € Uz (t)} andAzp = {t ¢ U2 Aix :w3(t) € Ux (t)} and so forth. Any ¢ € S, must be contained in oneof these A,, for some r since if not so, there would not be a sequence w, (ft) convergingto w; € A(u(t),t). These A,, partition S, and each is measurable since the {z, (t)} aremeasurable. Letiy (1) = Y Pin (1) w(t)Thus W; (t) is in U; (t) for all t € S,, and equals exactly one of the w,, (t) € G(r).Also, by construction, the , (-) are bounded in L®” (S,;V’). Therefore, there is a subse-quence of these, still called ¥% which converges weakly to a function w in L? (Sp;V').Thus w is a weak limit point of co Gau i) for each k. Therefore, in the open ball