1592 CHAPTER 48. MULTIFUNCTIONS AND THEIR MEASURABILITY

such that for a.e.(t,ω)

α (t,ω) ≡ lim infk→∞⟨znk (t,ω) ,unk (t,ω)− y(t,ω)⟩

= lim infk→∞⟨znk (t,ω) ,u(t,ω)− y(t,ω)⟩ ≥ ⟨wt,ω ,u(t,ω)− y(t,ω)⟩.

Then on the exceptional set, let α (t,ω)≡ ∞, and consider the set

F (t,ω)≡ {w ∈ A(u(t,ω) , t,ω) : ⟨w,u(t,ω)− y(t,ω)⟩ ≤ α (t,ω)} ,

which then satisfies F (t,ω) ̸= /0. Now F (t,ω) is closed and convex in V ′.Claim : (t,x)→ F (t,ω) has a measurable selection off a set of measure zero.Proof of claim: Letting B(0,C (t,ω)) contain A(u(t,ω) , t,ω) , we can assume

(t,ω)→C (t,ω)

is P measurable by using the estimates and the measurability of u. For γ ∈ N, let Sγ ≡{(t,ω) : C (t,ω)< γ} . If it is shown that F has a measurable selection on Sγ , then it followsthat it has a measurable selection. Thus in what follows, assume that (t,ω) ∈ Sγ .

Define

G(t,ω)≡{

w : ⟨w,u(t,ω)− y(t,ω)⟩< α (t,ω)+1n

, (t,ω) /∈ Σ

}∩B(0,γ)

Thus, it was shown above that this G(t,ω) ̸= /0 at least for large enough γ . For U open,

G− (U)≡{

(t,ω) ∈ Sγ : for some w ∈U ∩B(0,γ) ,⟨w,u(t,ω)− y(t,ω)⟩< α (t,ω)+ 1

n

}(*)

Let{

w j}

be a dense subset of U ∩B(0,γ). This is possible because V ′ is separable. Theexpression in ∗ equals

∪∞k=1

{(t,ω) ∈ Sγ : ⟨wk,u(t,ω)− y(t,ω)⟩< α (t,ω)+

1n

}which is measurable. Thus G is a measurable multifunction.

Since (t,ω)→ G(t,ω) is measurable, there is a sequence {wn (t,ω)} of measurablefunctions such that ∪∞

n=1wn (t,ω) equals

G(t,ω) =

{w : ⟨w,u(t,ω)− y(t,ω)⟩ ≤ α (t,ω)+

1n

, t /∈ Σ

}∩B(0,γ)

As shown above, there exists wt,ω in A(u(t,ω) , t,ω) as well as G(t,ω) . Thus there isa sequence of wr (t,ω) converging to wt,ω . Of course r will need to depend on t,ω . Since(t,ω)→ A(u(t,ω) , t,ω) is a measurable multifunction, it has a countable subset of Pmeasurable functions {zk (t,ω)} which is dense in A(u(t,ω) , t,ω). Let

Uk (t,ω)≡ ∪mB(

zm (t,ω) ,1k

)⊆ A(u(t,ω) , t,ω)+B

(0,

2k

)

1592 CHAPTER 48. MULTIFUNCTIONS AND THEIR MEASURABILITYsuch that for a.e.(t,@)(0) = Tim inf (2 (1,0) st (f,0) y(t, 0))= lim inf (Zn, (t,@) ,u(t,@) —y(t,@)) 2 (Wro,U(t,@) —y(t,@)).Then on the exceptional set, let a (t, @) = °°, and consider the setF (t,@) = {w €A(u(t,@),t,@) : (w,u(t,@) —y(t,@)) < a(t,@)},which then satisfies F (t,@) #0. Now F (t, @) is closed and convex in V’.Claim : (t,x) — F (t,@) has a measurable selection off a set of measure zero.Proof of claim: Letting B(0,C (t,@)) contain A (u(t, @) ,t, @), we can assume(t,@) + C(t,@)is # measurable by using the estimates and the measurability of u. For y € N, let Sy ={(t,@) :C(t,@) < y}. Ifit is shown that F has a measurable selection on Sy, then it followsthat it has a measurable selection. Thus in what follows, assume that (t,@) € Sy.Define1G(1,0) = {wi (mu(ro)—y(,0)) <a(0,0)+ 2, (0) ¢ ELBO7Thus, it was shown above that this G(t, @) 4 @ at least for large enough y. For U open,cust (t,@) € S,: for some w € UNB(0,Y), \(w,u(t,@) —y(t,@)) <a@(t,@) +4 (*)Let {w i} be a dense subset of UMB(0,7). This is possible because V’ is separable. Theexpression in * equalsUrey {(0) € Sy: (we,u(t,@) —y(t,@)) < a(t.o)+ 7}which is measurable. Thus G is a measurable multifunction.Since (t,@) — G(t,@) is measurable, there is a sequence {w, (t,@)} of measurablefunctions such that U*_, wy (t,@) equalsG(t,@) = {w: (w,u(t,@)—y(t,@)) < a(to)+—0¢ rhnBO7As shown above, there exists w;@ in A (u(t, @) ,t,@) as well as G(t,@). Thus there isa sequence of w, (ft, @) converging to w;,. Of course r will need to depend on ft, @. Since(t,@) + A(u(t,@),t,@) is a measurable multifunction, it has a countable subset of Ymeasurable functions {zz (t, @)} which is dense in A (u(t, @) ,t,@). LetUg (t, ©) = UmB (<n (t,@), z) CA(u(t,@),t,@)+B (0.7)