52.2. BRANCHES OF THE LOGARITHM 1653

continuous and so(f−1)′ ( f (z)) = lim

f (z1)→ f (z)

f−1 ( f (z1))− f−1 ( f (z))f (z1)− f (z)

= limz1→z

z1− zf (z1)− f (z)

=1

f ′ (z).

This proves the theorem.One does not have to look very far to find that this sort of thing does not hold for

functions mapping R to R. Take for example, the function f (x) = x2. Then f (R) is neithera point nor a region. In fact f (R) fails to be open.

Corollary 52.1.2 Suppose in the situation of Theorem 52.1.1 m > 1 for the local represen-tation of f given in this theorem. Then there exists δ > 0 such that if w ∈ B( f (z0) ,δ ) =f (V ) for V an open set containing z0, then f−1 (w) consists of m distinct points in V. ( f ism to one on V )

Proof: Let w ∈ B( f (z0) ,δ ) . Then w = f (ẑ) where ẑ ∈V. Thus f (ẑ) = f (z0)+φ (ẑ)m .

Consider the m distinct numbers,{

e2kπi

m φ (ẑ)}m

k=1. Then each of these numbers is in B(0,δ )

and so since φ maps V one to one onto B(0,δ ) , there are m distinct numbers in V , {zk}mk=1

such that φ (zk) = e2kπi

m φ (ẑ). Then

f (zk) = f (z0)+φ (zk)m = f (z0)+

(e

2kπim φ (ẑ)

)m

= f (z0)+ e2kπiφ (ẑ)m = f (z0)+φ (ẑ)m = f (ẑ) = w

This proves the corollary.

52.2 Branches Of The LogarithmThe argument used in to prove the next theorem was used in the proof of the open mappingtheorem. It is a very important result and deserves to be stated as a theorem.

Theorem 52.2.1 Let Ω be a simply connected region and suppose f : Ω→ C is analyticand nonzero on Ω. Then there exists an analytic function, g such that eg(z) = f (z) for allz ∈Ω.

Proof: The function, f ′/ f is analytic on Ω and so by Corollary 51.7.23 there is aprimitive for f ′/ f , denoted as g1. Then

(e−g1 f

)′=− f ′

fe−g1 f + e−g1 f ′ = 0

and so since Ω is connected, it follows e−g1 f equals a constant, ea+ib. Therefore, f (z) =eg1(z)+a+ib. Define g(z)≡ g1 (z)+a+ ib.

The function, g in the above theorem is called a branch of the logarithm of f and iswritten as log( f (z)).

52.2. BRANCHES OF THE LOGARITHM 1653continuous and so—1\/ _ :(F) F@) = fanart) f(z) —Z—Z olI Fa)-fe FoThis proves the theorem.One does not have to look very far to find that this sort of thing does not hold forfunctions mapping R to R. Take for example, the function f (x) =x”. Then f (IR) is neithera point nor a region. In fact f (IR) fails to be open.Corollary 52.1.2 Suppose in the situation of Theorem 52.1.1 m > | for the local represen-tation of f given in this theorem. Then there exists 6 > 0 such that if w € B(f (zo),6) =f (V) for V an open set containing zo, then f—' (w) consists of m distinct points in V. (f ism to one on V )Proof: Let w € B(f (zo) ,6). Then w= f (2) where Z€ V. Thus f (Z) = f (zo) + 6 (Z)”mConsider the m distinct numbers, {erm m Q(Z je . Then each of these numbers is in B (0, 5)9 (2)and so since ¢ maps V one to one onto B(0, 5), there are m distinct numbers in V, {z,} 1such that @ (z,) =e om (Zz). ThenP(e) = fle) +(e)" =F leo) +(e" o@)"= f(z) +e" ("=F (20) +0)" =F =wThis proves the corollary.52.2. Branches Of The LogarithmThe argument used in to prove the next theorem was used in the proof of the open mappingtheorem. It is a very important result and deserves to be stated as a theorem.Theorem 52.2.1 Let Q be a simply connected region and suppose f : Q— C is analyticand nonzero on Q. Then there exists an analytic function, g such that es) = f (z) for allzEQ.Proof: The function, f’/f is analytic on Q and so by Corollary 51.7.23 there is aprimitive for f’/f, denoted as g,. Then(es! f)’ _ fenpreny =0and so since © is connected, it follows e~§! f equals a constant, e‘tib | Therefore, f(Zi=es1(2)+4+ Define g(z) = 91 (z) +a+ib.The function, g in the above theorem is called a branch of the logarithm of f and iswritten as log (f (z)).