1824 CHAPTER 58. ELLIPTIC FUNCTIONS

and (w1w2

)=

(e fg h

)(w′1w′2

).

Therefore, (w′1 w′1w′2 w′2

)=

(a bc d

)(e fg h

)(w′1 w′1w′2 w′2

).

However, since w′1/w′2 is not real, it is routine to verify that

det(

w′1 w′1w′2 w′2

)̸= 0.

Therefore, (1 00 1

)=

(a bc d

)(e fg h

)and so det

(a bc d

)det(

e fg h

)= 1. But the two matrices have all integer entries and

so both determinants must equal either 1 or −1.Next suppose (

w′1w′2

)=

(a bc d

)(w1w2

)(58.1.5)

where(

a bc d

)is unimodular. I need to verify that {w′1,w′2} is a basis. If w ∈M, there

exist integers, m,n such that

w = mw1 +nw2 =(

m n)( w1

w2

)From 58.1.5

±(

d −b−c a

)(w′1w′2

)=

(w1w2

)and so

w =±(

m n)( d −b−c a

)(w′1w′2

)which is an integer linear combination of {w′1,w′2} . It only remains to verify that w′1/w′2 isnot real.

Claim: Let w1 and w2 be nonzero complex numbers. Then w2/w1 is not real if andonly if

w1w2−w1w2 = det(

w1 w1w2 w2

)̸= 0

Proof of the claim: Let λ = w2/w1. Then

w1w2−w1w2 = λw1w1−w1λw1 =(

λ −λ

)|w1|2

1824 CHAPTER 58. ELLIPTIC FUNCTIONSwi \_(e f wiWw g h wy )°wi wh _(ab e f wi whwy wy] \e d gh Wh Wh JHowever, since w’, /w’ is not real, it is routine to verify thatPopdet ( "I Ht) 0./W2 W)Cor )e(oa)Gs #)and so det ( : b ) det ( ; f ) = |. But the two matrices have all integer entries andandTherefore,anTherefore,d hso both determinants must equal either 1 or —1.Next suppose/Ww, _ a b WiC=C a) Ce) aiswhere ( : ’ ) is unimodular. I need to verify that {w/,w/} is a basis. If w € M, thereexist integers, m,n such thatw=mvw, +nw2 = ( mn )( )From 58.1.5and so ;_ d —b Wyw=+(m ny (4. Pym)which is an integer linear combination of {w},w5}. It only remains to verify that w/w’ isnot real.Claim: Let w; and w2 be nonzero complex numbers. Then w2/w is not real if andonly if— __ Wr WyW1W2 — WW? = det _ 01W2 1W2 ( m4Proof of the claim: Let A = w2/w,. Thenw1W7 —W1W2 = Aww, — Wi Aw) = (2 — A) lw?