59.19. CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTIONS, PROKHOROV THEOREM 1927

=∫[|x j|≥ 2

u ]1dµn (x)

= µn

([x :∣∣x j∣∣≥ 2

u

]).

If ε > 0 is given, there exists r > 0 such that if u≤ r,

1u

∫ u

−u(1−ψ (te j))dt < ε/p

for all j = 1, · · · , p and so, by the dominated convergence theorem, the same is true withφ µn

in place of ψ provided n is large enough, say n≥ N (u). Thus, from 59.19.46, if u≤ r,and n≥ N (u),

µn

([x :∣∣x j∣∣≥ 2

u

])< ε/p

for all j ∈ {1, · · · , p}. It follows that for u≤ r and n≥ N (u) ,

µn

([x : ||x||

∞≥ 2

u

])< ε.

because [x : ||x||

∞≥ 2

u

]⊆ ∪p

j=1

[x :∣∣x j∣∣≥ 2

u

]This proves the lemma because there are only finitely many measures, µn for n < N (u) andthe compact set can be enlarged finitely many times to obtain a single compact set, Kε suchthat for all n,µn ([x /∈ Kε ])< ε.

As before, there are simple modifications of Lemmas 59.18.3 and 59.18.4. The first ofthese is as follows.

Lemma 59.19.3 If φ µn(t)→ φ µ (t) for all t, then whenever ψ ∈S, the Schwartz class,

µn (ψ)≡∫Rp

ψ (y)dµn (y)→∫Rp

ψ (y)dµ (y)≡ µ (ψ)

as n→ ∞.

Proof: By definition,

φ µ (y)≡∫Rp

eiy·xdµ (x) .

Also remember the inverse Fourier transform. Letting ψ ∈S, the Schwartz class,

F−1 (µ)(ψ) ≡ µ(F−1

ψ)≡∫Rp

F−1ψdµ

=1

(2π)p/2

∫Rp

∫Rp

eiy·xψ (x)dxdµ (y)

=1

(2π)p/2

∫Rp

ψ (x)∫Rp

eiy·xdµ (y)dx

=1

(2π)p/2

∫Rp

ψ (x)φ µ (x)dx

59.19. CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTIONS, PROKHOROV THEOREM 1927ld xIces Bal)nied)If € > 0 is given, there exists r > 0 such that if u < 7,~ [d= wte))at <e/puUJ—ufor all 7 = 1,--- ,p and so, by the dominated convergence theorem, the same is true withPu, in place of w provided n is large enough, say n > N(u). Thus, from 59.19.46, if u <r,andn>N(u),tn (|x: fu >=]) <erpfor all j € {1,--- , p}. It follows that foru <randn>N(u),2Hn x: |[x|foo 2 7 <€E.2 2x: I|x||.. = | CUE, x: |x| > |This proves the lemma because there are only finitely many measures, 1, forn < N (u) andthe compact set can be enlarged finitely many times to obtain a single compact set, Kg suchthat for all n,u,, ([k ¢ Ke])<€. IAs before, there are simple modifications of Lemmas 59.18.3 and 59.18.4. The first ofthese is as follows.becauseLemma 59.19.3 If, (t) + , (t) for all t, then whenever y € ©, the Schwartz class,Hy (W) = v(y)dut, (9) > | W(y)du(y) =u(w)R? Reasn—- ©,Proof: By definition,ou(y)= | e*du (x).RPAlso remember the inverse Fourier transform. Letting y € G, the Schwartz class,F\(u)(y) = wl ty)= [ Ftyau1= yxy x) dxd(2m)?/? aa ton ben? “ u(y )1= Spe hw /. eva (y) dvsa |, vs)( Re1(mp xX), (x) dx