1952 CHAPTER 60. CONDITIONAL, MARTINGALES

60.2.2 The Submartingale Convergence Theorem

Theorem 60.2.7 (submartingale convergence theorem) Let

{(Xi,Si)}∞

i=1

be a submartingale with K ≡ supE (|Xn|) < ∞. Then there exists a random variable, X ,such that E (|X |)≤ K and

limn→∞

Xn (ω) = X (ω) a.e.

Proof: Let a,b ∈ Q and let a < b. Let Un[a,b] (ω) be the number of upcrossings of

{Xi (ω)}ni=1. Then let

U[a,b] (ω)≡ limn→∞

Un[a,b] (ω) = number of upcrossings of {Xi} .

By the upcrossing lemma,

E(

Un[a,b]

)≤ E (|Xn|)+ |a|

b−a≤ K + |a|

b−a

and so by the monotone convergence theorem,

E(U[a,b]

)≤ K + |a|

b−a< ∞

which shows U[a,b] (ω) is finite a.e., for all ω /∈ S[a,b] where P(S[a,b]

)= 0. Define

S≡ ∪{

S[a,b] : a,b ∈Q, a < b}.

Then P(S) = 0 and if ω /∈ S, {Xk}∞

k=1 has only finitely many upcrossings of every intervalhaving rational endpoints. For such ω it cannot be the case that

lim supk→∞

Xk (ω)> lim infk→∞

Xk (ω)

because then you could pick rational a,b such that [a,b] is between the limsup and theliminf and there would be infinitely many upcrossings of [a,b]. Thus, for ω /∈ S,

lim supk→∞

Xk (ω) = lim infk→∞

Xk (ω)

= limk→∞

Xk (ω)≡ X∞ (ω) .

Letting X∞ (ω) ≡ 0 for ω ∈ S, Fatou’s lemma implies∫Ω

|X∞|dP =∫

lim infn→∞|Xn|dP≤ lim inf

n→∞

∫Ω

|Xn|dP≤ K

1952 CHAPTER 60. CONDITIONAL, MARTINGALES60.2.2. The Submartingale Convergence TheoremTheorem 60.2.7 (submartingale convergence theorem) Let{ (X; ’ Si) yin 1be a submartingale with K = sup E (|X,|) < 0%. Then there exists a random variable, X,such that E (|X|) < K andlim X, (@) = X (@) ae.n—scoProof: Let a,b € Q and let a < b. Let Ui) (@) be the number of upcrossings of{X;(@) }/_,. Then letUap} (@) = tim Uj,,»| (@) = number of upcrossings of {X;}-.By the upcrossing lemma,E(\X,|)+la| ~ K+|alnE (Uy) < b-a— baand so by the monotone convergence theorem,K+l|a|E (Ua) < >=, <which shows Uj,,] (@) is finite a.e., for all @ ¢ Sjqyj where P (Sj, 4) = 0. DefineS=U {Sta,b] :a,beEQa< b}.Then P(S) = 0 and if @ ¢ S, {X;};_, has only finitely many upcrossings of every intervalhaving rational endpoints. For such @ it cannot be the case thatlim sup X;,(@) > lim inf X;,(@)k- 00 k—yo0because then you could pick rational a,b such that [a,b] is between the limsup and theliminf and there would be infinitely many upcrossings of [a,b]. Thus, for @ ¢ S,lim sup X,(@) = lim inf X;(@)k—-00 k-y00= limX;,(@) =X..(@).k-00Letting X..(@) = 0 for @ € S, Fatou’s lemma implies[i ixelap= [im inf |X,|dP <lim int | IX,|dP<K WQ Q n—yoo n> JO