62.2. KOLMOGOROV ČENTSOV CONTINUITY THEOREM 2055

Therefore,

P([||Y (t)−X (t)||> 0])

= P(∪∞

k=1

[||Y (t)−X (t)||> 1

k

])≤

∑k=1

P([||Y (t)−X (t)||> 1

k

])= 0.

A few observations are interesting. In the proof, the following inequality was obtained.∣∣∣∣X (d′)(ω)−X (d)(ω)∣∣∣∣ ≤ 2

T γ (1−2−γ)

(T 2−(n+1)

≤ 2T γ (1−2−γ)

(∣∣d−d′∣∣)γ

which was so for any d′,d ∈ D with |d′−d| < T 2−(M(ω)+1). Thus the Holder continuousversion of X will satisfy

||Y (t)(ω)−Y (s)(ω)|| ≤ 2T γ (1−2−γ)

(|t− s|)γ

provided |t− s|< T 2−(M(ω)+1). Does this translate into an inequality of the form

||Y (t)(ω)−Y (s)(ω)|| ≤ 2T γ (1−2−γ)

(|t− s|)γ

for any pair of points t,s ∈ [0,T ]? It seems it does not for any γ < 1 although it does yield

||Y (t)(ω)−Y (s)(ω)|| ≤C (|t− s|)γ

where C depends on the number of intervals having length less than T 2−(M(ω)+1) whichit takes to cover [0,T ] . First note that if γ > 1, then the Holder continuity will imply t →Y (t)(ω) is a constant. Therefore, the only case of interest is γ < 1. Let s, t be any pair ofpoints and let s = x0 < · · ·< xn = t where |xi− xi−1|< T 2−(M(ω)+1). Then

||Y (t)(ω)−Y (s)(ω)|| ≤n

∑i=1||Y (xi)(ω)−Y (xi−1)(ω)||

≤ 2T γ (1−2−γ)

n

∑i=1

(|xi− xi−1|)γ (62.2.9)

How does this compare to (n

∑i=1|xi− xi−1|

= |t− s|γ ?

This last expression is smaller than the right side of 62.2.9 for any γ < 1. Thus for γ < 1,the constant in the conclusion of the theorem depends on both T and ω /∈ N.

In the case where α ≥ 1, here is another proof of this theorem. It is based on the one inthe book by Stroock [121].

62.2. KOLMOGOROV CENTSOV CONTINUITY THEOREM 2055Therefore,X (t)|| > 0))ros. ire -xll>4])< Ye({ir@-xill>;])=0. 4A few observations are interesting. In the proof, the following inequality was obtained.I|X (d') (@) —X (d)(@)|| < vara (romn)!< — 7= TY(1-2-7)which was so for any d’,d € D with |d’ —d| < T2-()+)), Thus the Holder continuousversion of X will satisfy(|d—a'|)"2_ _ — 6|)VI|¥ (¢) (@) —¥ (s)(@)|| < TY 2-7) (|t—s|)provided |t — s| < T2~\“(@)+), Does this translate into an inequality of the formIX O()-Y | < FHSfor any pair of points t,s € [0,7]? It seems it does not for any y < 1 although it does yieldIY (1) (@) -¥ (s) (@)|| SC (ts)where C depends on the number of intervals having length less than T2~™(®)+") whichit takes to cover [0,7]. First note that if y > 1, then the Holder continuity will imply t >Y (t)(@) is a constant. Therefore, the only case of interest is y < 1. Let s,t be any pair ofpoints and let s = x9 < +--+ <X, =t where |x; — x;-1| < T2-“(®)+1)_ ThenIY («) (@) — onli s PI xi) Y (x11) (@)||n< = ral —_ 7 yd lx; — x31 (62.2.9)n YY |x — x11 =|t—s|"?i=]This last expression is smaller than the right side of 62.2.9 for any y < 1. Thus for y < 1,the constant in the conclusion of the theorem depends on both T and @ ¢ N.In the case where a > 1, here is another proof of this theorem. It is based on the one inthe book by Stroock [121].How does this compare to