2084 CHAPTER 62. STOCHASTIC PROCESSES

Thus A ∈Fτ and so Fσ ⊆Fτ .Consider the following approximation of τ in which tn

k = k2−n.

τn ≡∞

∑k=1

X[τ∈(tnk ,t

nk+1]]

tnk+1

Thus τn ↓ τ . Consider for U an open set, X (τn)−1 (U)∩ [τn < t] . Say t ∈ (tn

k , tnk+1]. Then

from the above definition of τn,

[τn < t] = [τ ≤ tnk ] ∈Ftn

k⊆Ft

It follows that

X (τn)−1 (U)∩ [τn < t] = ∪k

j=1

∈Ftnj

X(tn

j)−1

(U)∩∈Ftnj[

τn = tnj]

and so this set is in Ftnk⊆Ft . The reason[

τn = tnj]∈Ftn

j

is that it equals[τ ∈ (tn

j−1, tnj ]]∈Ftn

jby assumption that τ is a stopping time.

By right continuity of X , it follows that

X (τ)−1 (U)∩ [τ < t] = ∪∞m=1∩n≥m X (τn)

−1 (U)∩ [τn < t] ∈Ft

It follows that for every m,

X (τ)−1 (U)∩ [τ ≤ t] = ∩∞n=mX (τ)−1 (U)∩

[τ < t +

1n

]∈Ft+ 1

m

Since the filtration is normal, it follows that

X (τ)−1 (U)∩ [τ ≤ t] ∈Ft+ = Ft .

Now consider an increasing family of stopping times, τ (t) (ω→ τ (t)(ω)). It turns outthis is a submartingale.

Example 62.7.9 Let {τ (t)} be an increasing family of stopping times. Then τ (t) is adap-ted to the σ algebras Fτ(t) and {τ (t)} is a submartingale adapted to these σ algebras.

First I need to show that a stopping time, τ is Fτ measurable. Consider [τ ≤ s] . Isthis in Fτ ? Is [τ ≤ s]∩ [τ ≤ r] ∈Fr for each r? This is obviously so if s ≤ r because theintersection reduces to [τ ≤ s] ∈Fs ⊆Fr. On the other hand, if s > r then the intersectionreduces to [τ ≤ r] ∈Fr and so it is clear that τ is Fτ measurable. It remains to verify it isa submartingale.

Let s < t and let A ∈Fτ(s)∫A

E(τ (t) |Fτ(s)

)dP≡

∫A

τ (t)dP≥∫

Aτ (s)dP

2084 CHAPTER 62. STOCHASTIC PROCESSESThus A € ¥, and so Yo C Fz.Consider the following approximation of tT in which t? = k2~”.t= YP ercpap, fe=1Thus Tt, | t. Consider for U an open set, X (t,)~'(U)A[t, <t]. Say t € (t2,t¢,,]. Thenfrom the above definition of T,,(tn <t)=[t< fF CF,It follows thatcFn FnX (tn) | (U)A[t <t] =UK_|X (7) (U)N[t =|and so this set is in Fin C F,. The reasonJOBy right continuity of X, it follows thatis that it equals k E(t" "] € Fy by assumption that T is a stopping time.X(t) | U)A[t <t] =UR) OnemX (tr) | (WU) A[tn <1] € F,It follows that for every m,1mX(t) (WU) Ale <=, X (1)! (UU) fe<r4 2] € F,,Since the filtration is normal, it follows thatX(t) |U)A[t<teFA,=%. |Now consider an increasing family of stopping times, t (t) (@ — T(t) (@)). It turns outthis is a submartingale.Example 62.7.9 Let {t (t)} be an increasing family of stopping times. Then 7 (t) is adap-ted to the o algebras F,,) and {1 (t)} is a submartingale adapted to these o algebras.First I need to show that a stopping time, tT is 7, measurable. Consider [t < 5]. Isthis in F,? Is [t <s]M[t <r] € F, for each r? This is obviously so if s < r because theintersection reduces to [tT < s] € ¥, C F¥,. On the other hand, if s > r then the intersectionreduces to [t <r] € F, and so it is clear that t is , measurable. It remains to verify it isa submartingale.Let s <tand let A € F7(,)[ECO lFa)aP= [ eaP> f csyar