2092 CHAPTER 62. STOCHASTIC PROCESSES

By the Borel Cantelli lemma, there exists a set of measure 0, Nt such that for ω /∈ Nt ,ω iscontained in only finitely many of the sets[

supr∈Q+∩[0,t]

|X (r)| ≥ 2m

]

which shows that for ω /∈ Nt ,supr∈Q+∩[0,t] |X (r)| is bounded. Now let N = ∪∞j=1N j. This

proves the second claim.Next consider the first claim. By the upcrossing estimate, Theorem 60.6.9 or Lemma

60.2.6, and letting a < b and Un[a,b] [c,d] the upcrossings of Yk from a to b on [c,d] for d ≤ t

and c≥ 0,

E(

Un[a,b] [0, t]

)≤ 1

b−aE((Yn−a)+

)=

1b−a

E((X (t)−a)+

).

Hence

P([

Un[a,b] [0, t]≥M

])≤ 1

M

(1

b−aE((X (t)−a)+

)). (62.8.27)

Suppose for some s < t,

lim supr→s+,r∈Q

X (r,ω)> b > a > lim infr→s+,r∈Q

X (r,ω) . (62.8.28)

If this is so, then in (s, t)∩Q there must be infinitely many values of r ∈ Q such thatX (r,ω) ≥ b as well as infinitely many values of r ∈ Q such that X (r,ω) ≤ a. Note thisinvolves the consideration of a limit from one side. Thus, since it is a limit from one sideonly, there are an arbitrarily large number of upcrossings between s and t. Therefore, lettingM be a large positive number, it follows that for all n sufficiently large,

Un[a,b] [0, t] (ω)≥M

which impliesω ∈

[Un[a,b] [0, t]≥M

]which from 62.8.27 is a set of measure no more than

1M

(1

b−aE((X (t)−a)+

)).

This has shown that the set of ω such that for some s ∈ [0, t) 62.8.28 holds is contained inthe set

N[a,b] ≡ ∩∞M=1∪∞

n=1

[Un[a,b] [0, t]≥M

]Now the sets, [

Un[a,b] [0, t]≥M

]

2092 CHAPTER 62. STOCHASTIC PROCESSESBy the Borel Cantelli lemma, there exists a set of measure 0, N; such that for @ ¢ N,,@ iscontained in only finitely many of the sets| sup |X (r)| > 2reQtn[0,t]which shows that for @ ¢ N;,SUp,<@+njo, |X (r)| is bounded. Now let N = U?_,Nj. Thisproves the second claim.Next consider the first claim. By the upcrossing estimate, Theorem 60.6.9 or Lemma60.2.6, and letting a < b and U/, [c,d] the upcrossings of Y¥, from a to b on [c,d] ford <tand c > 0,n I +E(Ujiyl01) < 5—E(n—a)*)1 += 5_,F ((X (¢) —a)")Hencen | 1 +P ( [Uo [0,1] > M]) <5 (52 (KW-a)")). (62.8.27)Suppose for some s < f,lim sup X(r,@)>b>a>lim inf X(r,0). (62.8.28)rs+,reEeQ rs+,reQIf this is so, then in (s,t) Q there must be infinitely many values of r € Q such thatX (r,@) > b as well as infinitely many values of r € Q such that X (7,@) < a. Note thisinvolves the consideration of a limit from one side. Thus, since it is a limit from one sideonly, there are an arbitrarily large number of upcrossings between s and t. Therefore, lettingM be a large positive number, it follows that for all n sufficiently large,Ul.» (0,t](@) >Mwhich impliesME [U0 [0,t] > M|which from 62.8.27 is a set of measure no more thana (page (x-2)")).This has shown that the set of @ such that for some s € [0,t) 62.8.28 holds is contained inthe setNoob) = irr Unat [Uf 9) [0.4] 2MNow the sets,[Uf [0.4] = |