2176 CHAPTER 63. THE QUADRATIC VARIATION OF A MARTINGALE

in the inequality, 63.8.48 and conclude∣∣∣∣E (eiλX(b))

eλ22 b−E

(eiλX(a)e

λ22 a)∣∣∣∣

≤ O(1)((b−a)−

(E(

X (b)2)−E

(X (a)2

)))= 0.

Therefore,

E(

eiλX(b))= E

(eiλX(a)

)e−

λ22 (b−a)

This proves the lemma because p was arbitrary.Now from this lemma, it is not hard to establish Levy’s theorem.

Theorem 63.8.5 Let {X (t)} be a real continuous martingale adapted to the filtration

Ft for t ∈ [0,a] some interval such that for all t ∈ [0,a] ,E(

X (t)2)< ∞. Suppose also

that{

X (t)2− t}

is a martingale. Then for s < t,X (t)− X (s) is normally distributedwith mean 0 and variance t − s. Also if 0 ≤ t0 < t1 < · · · < tm ≤ b, then the increments{

X (t j)−X(t j−1

)}are independent.

Proof: Let the t j be as described above and consider the interval [tm−1, tm] in place of[a,b] in Lemma 63.8.4. Also let λ k for k = 1,2, · · · ,m be given. For t ∈ [tm−1, tm] , andλ m ̸= 0,

Zλ m (t) =1

λ m

m−1

∑j=1

λ j(X (t j)−X

(t j−1

))+(X (t)−X (tm−1))

Then it is clear that{

Zλ m (t)}

is a martingale on [tm−1, tm] . What is possibly less clear is that{Zλ m (t)

2− t}

is also a martingale. Note that Zλ m (t) = X (t)+Y where Y is measurable inFtm−1 . Therefore, for s < t,s ∈ [tm−1, tm] ,

E(

Zλ m (t)2− t|Fs

)= E

(X (t)2 +2X (t)Y +Y 2− t|Fs

)

= X (s)2− s+2E (X (t)Y |Fs)+Y 2

= X (s)2− s+2Y X (s)+Y 2 = Zλ m (s)2− s

and so Lemma 63.8.4 can be applied to conclude

E(

eiλZλm (tm))= E

(eiλZλm (tm−1)

)e−

λ22 (tm−tm−1).

Now letting λ = λ m,

E(

ei∑mj=1 λ j(X(t j)−X(t j−1))

)= E

(ei∑

m−1j=1 λ j(X(t j)−X(t j−1))

)e−

λ2m2 (tm−tm−1).

2176 CHAPTER 63. THE QUADRATIC VARIATION OF A MARTINGALEin the inequality, 63.8.48 and concludec (eX) orb _E (« iAX(a) *)|< O(1) ((b—a)~ (E(X(b)”) -E(x(@)))) =0.Therefore,E (2x0) _E (2x0) od (b-a)This proves the lemma because p was arbitrary.Now from this lemma, it is not hard to establish Levy’s theorem.Theorem 63.8.5 Let {X (t)} be a real continuous martingale adapted to the filtrationF, for t € [0,a] some interval such that for all t € [0,a],E (x ()°) <0, Suppose alsothat {x (t) — 1} is a martingale. Then for s < t,X (t) —X(s) is normally distributedwith mean 0 and variance t — s. Also if 0 < to < t) < +++ <tn <b, then the increments{X (t;) —X (tj-1) } are independent.Proof: Let the t; be as described above and consider the interval [tm—1,tm] in place of[a,b] in Lemma 63.8.4. Also let A, for k = 1,2,---,m be given. For t € [tn—1,tn], andAm #0,Zy, (0) = Lace x (tj-1)) + (X(t) —X (tm-1))Then it is clear that {Zi,, (t) is a martingale on |t,—1,tm]. What is possibly less clear is that{Zi, (t)? — rf is also a martingale. Note that Z,, (t) =X (t) + Y¥ where Y is measurable inF,,_,. Therefore, for s <t,s € [tm—1,tn] ,E (Zi, (r)?— |F,) =E (x (1)? 42x (t)¥ +¥?2 — 1\F,_)= X(s)?—s+2E (X (t)Y|Fy) +Y¥?= X(s)°—s+2YX(s)+¥?=Z,, (s)’—sand so Lemma 63.8.4 can be applied to conclude. : 42E (Ca ™)) -<E (c%m (m-) ee (tm—tm-1)Now letting A = Am,E (eRe) =E(e LAX )-*-1))) 0 BE tm tm—1)